• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Nintendo @ E3 - No Direct, Just Zelda Treehouse Stream

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aikidoka

Member
Nintendo looks like they are trying to make their releases fail. Bailing out on the largest gaming industry event makes me think they are not capable of supporting their system and so isn't worth buying. Hopefully they can turn this situation around by the end of the year.
 
Cmon man, Zelda games have barely evolved since OoT. Majora's Mask is the only truly unique 3D Zelda since.

To be fair, Dark Souls is even more guilty of this. At least Zelda changes up something big each game (time loops, sailing, twilight, motion+, etc), while Dark Souls II and III really only tweaks certain mechanics and even often reuses equipment, enemies, and even the exact same boss twice. Not that this is a bad thing, mind, but calling the kettle black, you know?
 
Come to the Nintendo E3 for some special events! We have several stuff like a 20-min demo of Zelda, Zelda info, Zelda artwork, and maaaaaybe some vague NX info.

We'll make your admissions worth it.
 
So no Pokemon Sun & Moon trailer either? That's weird.

Better show it soon then.
That's why the "they have nothing to show" narrative isn't that convincing. The new pokemon game is coming out this year world wide yet they're not showing that either. Considering how big of a deal a mainline pokemon game is why not show it? Just seems like there's more to these decisions then "there's nothing to show".
 

Muzy72

Banned
Woo, called it!

Are people really shocked? After they said NX wouldn't be at E3 and that Zelda was the only playable game, it was freaking obvious that there wouldn't be a Digital Event this year. They simply do not have the content to justify doing one. Literally the only games coming worldwide to their systems this year are Pokémon Sun/Moon, Paper Mario: Color Splash, Metroid Prime: Federation Force, and Mario & Sonic at the Rio 2016 Olympic Games. Outside of Pokémon that list is trash, and this is coming from someone who plans on getting both Paper Mario and Metroid. And you're kidding yourself if you think they were gonna announce any more Wii U games.

I much prefer them only showing Zelda (which is going to be amazing!) than waste my time on a Digital Event with the kind of lineup they have. Plus, I can almost guarantee that The Pokémon Company will do at least something Pokémon Sun/Moon related at E3 since Masuda is attending. Dude isn't flying out to LA for nothing.

And honestly, just new Zelda and Pokémon info is much better than last year's Digital Event.
 
To be fair, Dark Souls is even more guilty of this. At least Zelda changes up something big each game (time loops, sailing, twilight, motion+, etc), while each Souls games really only tweaks certain mechanics and even often reuses equipment, enemies, and even the same boss twice.
To be fair, 5 Dark Souls games have released in the past 7 years, and they're all amazing.
 

cheesekao

Member
Or you do but you don't feel E3 is as relevant as it once was and that a standalone event will be equally if not more memorable.
This meme needs to stop
twitch-e3-infographic.jpg
 
Rösti;202703441 said:
Nintendo's 76th Annual General Meeting of Shareholders is scheduled to be held on June 29, 2016. That will hopefully bring some NX information (details on how and when NX will be revealed), and its not very long after E3 2016 either.
STAHP
 

what-ok

Member
This subversive approach may benefit nintendo. Look at all the wacky threads about a system that only exists to us in our minds. Hype over words and not the actual object they describe. Silly humans.
 

HeySeuss

Member
Rösti;202706705 said:
Nintendo originally had three booths reserved at E3 2016. The press release mentions booth (in singular):


Source: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20160505005536/en/Legend-Zelda-Wii-Playable-Time-E3

The initial floor plans (these may be severely outdated by now) can be found in this thread: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1194203

I also on May 2 posted the list of booths (though only one booth is shown there). These are the booths Nintendo had listed initially:



4822 (100 ft x 200 ft, 20000 sq ft)
5244 (110 ft x 90 ft, 9900 sq ft)
5644 (Irregular, 2100.18 sq ft)

They currently have 4822, that much I know. If they also have the other booths as well I cannot at the moment check due to a 302 redirect of the floor plans (these should be up sometime this month). But it's possible Nintendo has downsized.

Seems as though they originally had planned to possibly reveal the NX, but they hit some sort of development snag that delayed the console. I'm guessing there is more to the March 2017 date than simply that they wanted more games at launch and beyond.

I think there were either manufacturing issues or they went a different direction for something and don't have time to adjust before the holidays.

Hopefully it's nothing too serious because if that's the case, I'd be a little concerned about the console being half baked.
 

Calamari41

41 > 38
I mean that's significantly different from what you said in that post I quoted but yeah, that will be true then.

Ok then: The next Zelda will release after the successor to the Wii U is out, and on that successor as well. You know what I mean. The number of years between Zelda games is greater than the number of years that their current system is their current generation system, without overlap.
 

RK128

Member
After thinking about this for a bit......I'm still confused about this choice honestly.

I mean, its NOT like they have nothing to show for themselves this year. We got two more upcoming Wii U games and this could be a great place to show why people should be interested in Color Splash (as people already hate it for not being Thousand Year Door 2.....and I'm not in the camp, but not too thrilled about it being a Sticker Star sequel either) and make a big deal about Monster Hunter, Dragon Quest, MAINLINE Pokemon and a number of SEGA titles coming out on 3DS.

But.....no, you only focus on a game that isn't even a Wii U title anymore and is a dual-system release, great move Nintendo. I mean, I feel bad for people looking forward to Zelda, because the NX launch is preventing the Wii U version from coming out this year. That is a massive game and outside of a decent series of games from early this year to maybe late summer this year, the Wii U has nothing.

I could go into detail about what they could of done to show off the NX and stuff but many of you guys did a great job with that already :).

My main point is, only showing Zelda on Wii U's when gamers cannot play this until the new system is out, is a very strange game to focus on honestly.
 
To be fair, 5 Dark Souls games have released in the past 7 years, and they're all amazing.

As I said, not a bad thing, I love both Zelda and the Soulsborne games to death, and I really wish Sony and From could just remaster Demons Souls for PS4 already.
 
Why won't someone tell Nintendo games can only announced at e3?

Why won't they play by the rules and announce shit when we demand it be announced, GDI.

Fucking doomed.
 

KingSnake

The Birthday Skeleton
You can show hardware too, by this point. If SDKs and early dev kits are out, then there's a finalized build, prototypes, and, probably, demo-retail units already in existence at Nintendo.

I think this is more on their marketing timelines getting fucked by a delay than anything else. They want the NX revealed and released within X months, if a delay at +2 to that X, then they shift everything by 2.

It is nonsensical to suppose that they have no hardware to show. They have opted to show nothing for some reason, that reason isn't "we have nothing".

Yeah, they "opted" to show nothing. Like they "opted" to delay Zelda from 2016 to 2017 despite being already ready to be shown at E3.

There's not nonsensical, they don't have an NX to show now or in June. That's the true. If it's nonsensical, address that to Nintendo, they did this great planning.
 

Anth0ny

Member
To be fair, Dark Souls is even more guilty of this. At least Zelda changes up something big each game (time loops, sailing, twilight, motion+, etc), while each Souls games really only tweaks certain mechanics and even often reuses equipment, enemies, and even the same boss twice.

That being said, if they only released Dark Souls in 2011 and nothing since, I'd be TOTALLY ok with that.

These games are just PACKED with content. I feel like I could explore that world forever. Not the same with Skyward Sword or Twilight Princess, which is why it's so annoying that it takes them so long to make a new 3D Zelda every time. With Dark Souls, I'd actually have something to play for that 5 year wait. Not the case with 3D Zelda anymore.
 

Ansatz

Member
Bailing out on the largest gaming industry event makes me think they are not capable of supporting their system and so isn't worth buying

- You ended the conference with Nintendo Land?? Really?? This fucking company
- They brought Fucking Donkey Kong to VGAs, does Nintendo have a clue??

Basically, Nintendo's games no longer overlap with the general E3 audience and NX won't be any different. It's like bringing Wii Fit / Angry Birds to E3 when exposure clearly won't convert into sales in the case of these games.
 
I agree with you, but there has to be a middle ground. Zelda doesn't have to be an annual series of course, but this far apart? If you're ok with Zelda games so infrequent that they skip generations sometimes, that's fine. I think Nintendo's software output needs to be increased for business purposes... and I think that they agree with me.

Majora's Mask was a "recycled" game, and is still beloved. I think it would be smart for them to release sequels in that vein every now and then, but that's just my thought.

I agree, they need to find a way to make these games faster, I just didn't like the comparison to Souls :)
Long dev times is something Nintendo has for many of their big games actually. 3D Marios take a long time to make, too. Many of their big franchises only get one game per system. This is I think a combination of long dev times and business decisions (avoid fatigue, avoid splitting player bases for games with multi player). But I agree, it would be great if Zelda ( and some others, 3D Mario, Animal Crossing eg) could release more frequently.
 

Luckydog

Member
This meme needs to stop
...

Just because Twitch streamers watched doesnt make E3 relevent to who Nintendo is trying to reach or make the cost value prop good for them. I have no idea who they are trying to reach, but by whiffing on the last E3 before the launch of their console, I think that clearly says how valuable E3 is to them. And to the many other companies who have just been pulling out of E3.
 

Jebusman

Banned
Based on E3 being the most important marketing opportunity of the year by far.

Is it?

I mean, right now, in the year 2016, is it?

If Nintendo actually went through and pulled a Space World 2016, do you think E3 would still have been a larger opportunity to introduce NX to the world? Or would a dedicated 100% Nintendo only showing with all eyes on them potentially bring in more attention?

Who knows what the fuck Nintendo has planned, but saying they're not showing it because they "can't" show seems reductive.
 

MuchoMalo

Banned
Rösti;202703441 said:
Nintendo's 76th Annual General Meeting of Shareholders is scheduled to be held on June 29, 2016. That will hopefully bring some NX information (details on how and when NX will be revealed), and its not very long after E3 2016 either.

It'll be October. Everything's been pushed back four months. If NX gets delayed again, so will the reveal. If NX gets delayed after the reveal, there will be an information blackout for the length of the delay.
 
Which is exactly what they've done.

Again, they've refocused their entire company after the Wii U failed. Dozens of studios, thousands of employees, millions in R&D and a complete change in direction in how the company operates, but shit! they didn't have this new phase of their entire company's existence ready to show you by July 2016! Well they fucked it all up!

Even if Nintendo did not have a single game ready to show, they should have showed up. Do you know anything about partnerships with third parties? How would Nintendo build better relationship with third parties if they don´t have conference to show what games coming to their new hardware? Having a conference at E3 is also about strengthening third party relations, especially when the majority of third party games ignores Nintendo hardware.

What a reductive kind of thinking. First of all, they had problems developing the WiiU because it was an HD console. Secondly, both their handheld and their console should be more powerful than their previous iteration, which mean s larger development teams, larger budgets and larger time to develop games. They were unprepared to deal with HD in 2012, when all western developers went to the same trouble i 2006-2007. It´s not what they have to show me that is ready. It is about showing their vision of the future of their console, handheld and games. Not announcing their console prior to E3 and then showing games for said console at E3 is huge wasted opportunity. Sony and MS did the same thing. Even if Nintendo delayed the launch they should have absolutely done this. Sony did it, and we see how many delays all their games have. It´s about projecting your future vision to the consumer. But please continue to be ignorant about marketing realities, and gauging consumer interest, and of course building better relationship with third parties.
 

CronoShot

Member
Why won't someone tell Nintendo games can only announced at e3?

Why won't they play by the rules and announce shit when we demand it be announced, GDI.

Fucking doomed.
Yes, they're literally bringing one game to the biggest media event in the industry cause reasons.
 

Xenoblade

Member
I'm not sure how Nintendo could stifle hype and interest in their products any more than what they're currently doing. It's actually quite remarkable.
 

-Horizon-

Member
RIP Nintendo NX 2017 - 2016
So they went back in time and killed themselves?
Someone call up hollywood, I got a new movie idea to pitch to them

Ok then: The next Zelda will release after the successor to the Wii U is out, and on that successor as well. You know what I mean. The number of years between Zelda games is greater than the number of years that their current system is their current generation system, without overlap.
See, that wasn't so hard.

And honestly, I don't think this Zelda was delayed to 2017 for technical reasons. With it being ready to show at E3 for a whole day, I can imagine it would've been ready to ship this year. But you know, NX and all that mess.
 

georly

Member
It means that you need to overhaul your planing strategy, because missing the biggest media event in your medium is a huge waste of opportunity.

I don't think they missed it intentionally. I assume they don't want to announce the system with nothing but a nintendoland equivalent and aren't ready to show other stuff yet. So they either risk a mediocre reveal with a lot of eyes on it (wii u reveal version 2.0) or they have a solid reveal with less (but still a lot) of eyes on it.

Assuming that nx has a solid reveal later, of course. They're setting themselves up for that and they need to follow through or a lot of people will now be disappointed. It's the only thing that makes sense to your fans if you SKIP E3. If you skip E3 you must have a good reason to do so.
 

cheesekao

Member
- You ended the conference with Nintendo Land?? Really?? This fucking company
- They brought Fucking Donkey Kong to VGAs, does Nintenco have a clue??

Basically, Nintendo's games no longer overlap with the general E3 audience and NX won't be any different.
How do you plan on justifying this? Nintendo's E3 2015 show was badly received even by some hardcore Nintendo fans and that was all on Nintendo.
 

thefro

Member
So is anyone taking bets yet on when the NX is going to have the big reveal/blowout? I've got my money on September, because that would be 6 months from launch, and any later than that they risk being overshadowed by constant AAA releases from the competition.

I'd prefer August, but then that's only 2 months after E3 so then why bother with the (pretty obvious) last minute change of E3 plans? September would be pretty much perfect...

...except that it's 4 freaking months away.

There's really no reason for them to not show the system at E3 and then show it a month later in July, so July's out.

The Olympics are August 5th - 21st so they're likely going to avoid most of August.

They're going to want to reveal before/during Tokyo Game Show (starts Sept 15th) so their third party partners can announce stuff coming to NX there.

So any Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday between August 23rd and September 15th would be my guess.
 
Is it?

I mean, right now, in the year 2016, is it?

If Nintendo actually went through and pulled a Space World 2016, do you think E3 would still have been a larger opportunity to introduce NX to the world? Or would a dedicated 100% Nintendo only showing with all eyes on them potentially bring in more attention.
The week of E3 is the most important marketing opportunity of the year. All eyes are on the gaming industry this week, even including many people outside the industry.
 

atr0cious

Member
Stop being obtuse. Look up the Iron Knuckle fight from Ocarina, and then look up a random black knight fight from Dark Souls. The mechanics of the two games are at least in the same genre of gameplay.

Edit:

Iron Knuckle. You're going to tell me that this fight looks nothing like a primitive version of a 1v1 Souls fight mechanically?
How am I obtuse, when you're the one bringing up fights that barely happen in the game?
 

Finalow

Member
Janky in this case means often glitchy and suffering from technical issues or baffling mechanical design. For example, Dark Souls 3 has a poise stat that currently does literally nothing. There is a ring that raises your poise that does literally nothing. That's janky.

I'd still rather play Dark Souls 3 than any Zelda game.
in any case the meaning is ''poor/bad quality'', and this is not the case. hence what I said about the clueless buzzwords thrown around
all their games have technical issues (mostly on consoles), yes, but that's about it. often glitchy? It didn't seem more glitchy than the average game. ''baffling mechanical design'' ?? poise works with weapon arts, for once. and even if it was broken it's hardly a reason good enough to call the entire game 'janky'.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom