Yep, Mercury's Fermi Paradox is FAR more impressive, AND is 64KB...
They've really lost contact with the scene...
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
3D Mark releases new DX 12 benchmark - TimeSpy
- Thread starter ISee
- Start date
Yep, Mercury's Fermi Paradox is FAR more impressive, AND is 64KB...
They've really lost contact with the scene...
capitalCORN
Member
Benchmark software and the demo scene have very different goals. Benchmarks are designed to saturate feature sets. The demo scene revolves around developing efficient algorithms, that happen to be pretty.
s_mirage
Member
That's true, but the 3DMarks up to 2001 had really quite scene like demos included. Hell, I can't remember how many times I used to watch them. 2003's was less interesting, and since 2005 the demos have been pretty perfunctory graphics demonstrations; not an awful lot of stylistic flair or artistic direction to them. IMO, that's a shame.
Baron_Calamity
Member
What can I say?
I really need a new computer.
ThoseDeafMutes
Member
What can I say?
I really need a new computer.
Just a new video card really.
Self_Destructive
Member
That CPU test score :drool:
ipukespiders
Member
A couple of general bench mark questions:
For comparison to other systems, does 3dmark disable driver settings (like anti aliasing)?
When people post their results, shouldn't the display resolution the tests were run at be shared? Or is there something about the way the tests are done that negate the need?
For comparison to other systems, does 3dmark disable driver settings (like anti aliasing)?
When people post their results, shouldn't the display resolution the tests were run at be shared? Or is there something about the way the tests are done that negate the need?
If you don't mind me asking, how much was your NUC and external setup all told?
Vulcano's assistant
Banned
Too early to say 'good speed Firestrike'?
I thought Smokey was banned?
Slick Butter
Member
I have a 290X / i5 4690k
Default clocks:
Score: 3746
-GPU: 3879
-CPU: 3139
290X OC to 1.1GHz:
Score: 3986
-GPU: 4188
-CPU: 3134
Surprising jump for the OC I think? My CPU score seems a bit low, maybe I should OC that.
Default clocks:
Score: 3746
-GPU: 3879
-CPU: 3139
290X OC to 1.1GHz:
Score: 3986
-GPU: 4188
-CPU: 3134
Surprising jump for the OC I think? My CPU score seems a bit low, maybe I should OC that.
Baron_Calamity
Member
SonicKnights
Member
Graphics score: 5945 GTX 1070 MSI G1 Gaming
CPU score: 3784 AMD fx-8350 OCd 4.7 ghz
Combined score: 5475
That's good right? Holding out till the next wave of CPUs from both before I upgrade. Figure it will last till early next year. I do get a score of 11 of the steam VR test
CPU score: 3784 AMD fx-8350 OCd 4.7 ghz
Combined score: 5475
That's good right? Holding out till the next wave of CPUs from both before I upgrade. Figure it will last till early next year. I do get a score of 11 of the steam VR test
Infinite Xero
Member
Sapphire Fury @ 1080mhz and i7-2600k @ 4.5GHz
Seems like the latest drivers from AMD are unapproved. Maybe because they're beta?
that or are too old (like mine)
LostDonkey
Member
6700k @4.6
16gb DDR4 @ 3000
1070 G1 gaming Core+115 MHZ Mem+650 Mhz
Score: 6110
Graphics Score: 6328
CPU Score: 5111
16gb DDR4 @ 3000
1070 G1 gaming Core+115 MHZ Mem+650 Mhz
Score: 6110
Graphics Score: 6328
CPU Score: 5111
Muskieratboi
Member
Stress testing/Custom Settings is Paid DLC.
I guess Futuremark needed the extra 5 bucks?
I guess Futuremark needed the extra 5 bucks?
Possumowner
Member
Had no idea a new 3d mark was being released.Time to see what my score is
Cute Dragon Here
Member
What was the situation with Sky Diver a few years back?
DonMigs85
Member
I don't recall ever having to pay extra for the Sky Diver stress testing. I believe it was a totally free addition. But I bought the upgrade for Time Spy anyway.
Now I also can't wait for GFXBench to add their own DX12 and Vulkan tests.
Cute Dragon Here
Member
So anyone here running into problems with SystemInfo occasionally failing to run and rendering the test invalid? Or time measurement inconsistencies? Seems like I'm running into it on both my laptop and my desktop.
ThoseDeafMutes
Member
Temporarily
Whoa, what is your CPU running at? Anyway, clearly the CPU test is very well parallelized
Whoa, what is your CPU running at? Anyway, clearly the CPU test is very well parallelized
It's at 4.2GHz on air. Uncore is at stock. To go much further I'd have to be liquid cooling.
hooijdonk17
Member
RX 480's GPU score above the GTX 480 bodes well for the async future.
LostDonkey
Member
Type_Raver
Member
SCORE 2319
GPU GTX 680
CPU i7 3930K @4.6Ghz
Graphics score 2102
Graphics test 1 13.77 FPS
Graphics test 2 12.00 FPS
CPU test 5621
CPU test 18.89 FPS
Compare score link here:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13231208?
GPU GTX 680
CPU i7 3930K @4.6Ghz
Graphics score 2102
Graphics test 1 13.77 FPS
Graphics test 2 12.00 FPS
CPU test 5621
CPU test 18.89 FPS
Compare score link here:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13231208?
Dictator93
Member
Is the "demo" version updated as well? IIRC, it is just the full version with features locked-out that open up when you purchase it.
LostDonkey
Member
Sure is.
OK so I re ran the test, I had those pesky rundll processes hogging cpu time so I killed them and gave it another go.
Score 6155
Gpu score: 6221
Cpu score: 5810
Much better. I'm at a loss why those pesky processes keep on starting up.
Dictator93
Member
Thx!
Similar threads
- Locked