LegalEagleMike
Member
sounds like the people who have been looking forward to the game the most will enjoy it.
I edited why I think that. Review on base PS4 should be mandatory for any sort of credibility. It is where I would say 90% of the audience looking to purchase games are (a total guess since we have no Pro numbers but you should get what I mean)But you'll take the 4's and 6's and cancel pre order amirite
With the amount of technical issues with the base PS4 I honestly can not take anyone who gives it a 10/10 seriously.
I really think reviews need to at the least review with the base PS4.
10/10 doesn't mean a game is perfectWith the amount of technical issues with the base PS4 I honestly can not take anyone who gives it a 10/10 seriously.
I really think reviews need to at the least review with the base PS4.
There's the ignore function dude
Who?It's enigmatic_alex44.
Haha I love how I've read this explanation to people for over 20 years. Still people don't seem to understand it.10/10 doesn't mean a game is perfect
It just means the overall package is so good the writer feels it's worth the highest praise they gave give
Must be awesome that PLS first posted about Project Trico all those years ago and now gets to review the released game
Lightning must live on!Can we please stop bringing FFXIII scores into every reviews thread like it means a damn thing?
... seriously? Either some of your try waaay too hard or have a sad state of mind.
Sad state of mind seems most likely.
Anyways, lol @ all the "edgy" reviewers giving this a 4/10 or 5/10. Wonder how highly those outlets reviewed unimaginative yearly trash/fodder like CoD and BF. I'm not one to often claim people don't "get" something, but it's fairly clear these reviewers don't "get" this game.
I wonder who will review it.
Wha? Bloodborne had a ton of technical issues and is many people's GOTG. Games can transcend tech issues.With the amount of technical issues with the base PS4 I honestly can not take anyone who gives it a 10/10 seriously.
I really think reviews need to at the least review with the base PS4.
I get that people like the game.. but there are some big faults in the game..
- Control scheme. Use the same button for a lot of actions. And leaving lots of buttons on the Dualshock unused.
- Really bad camera. The camera is a pain .. even if you speed it up via the options it will be bad. It is a pain to control.. the camera was my biggest enemy in the game.
- Toriko/Trico. He responds fine most of the time.. but sometimes he is more than annoying.. Jumping back instead of forward.. not doing what he is supposed to do, because he stood in the wrong place.
Those three things combined ruined the enjoyment I had with this game. I like the core game.. but those things tore every ounce of enjoyment out of my body. I actually just wanted the game to end. It wasn't fun to play.
I've only followed this game from a distances, but I had a passing interest in it. After reading three reviews - Jim Sterling, Wired, Kotaku - I'm going to pass. I'm not clear whether the issues they all ran into directing Trico were designed to reflect how temperamental even loving, loyal animals can be, or whether they are bugs (I'm guessing the former). But they would affect me the same way: I'd go bonkers with frustration. I just have zero interest in a game were you can find the right solution and then deal with an uncooperative AI companion, even if that's the design. Everything else looks quite appealing, and I don't mind the dated visuals.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/dec/05/the-last-guardian-review-fumito-ueda-playstationEventually, the bond between boy and beast deepens to such a degree that youll be able to direct the creature with greater specificity.
I wonder who will review it.
Yeah this is terrible logic. "My opinion on something discredits someone else's "With the amount of technical issues with the base PS4 I honestly can not take anyone who gives it a 10/10 seriously.
I really think reviews need to at the least review with the base PS4.
Amazing that folks who have been breathlessly waiting for this game seem only interested in focusing on the negative reviews as justification for being a disappointment, while ignoring the glowing reviews the game is getting. Mind numbing.
Damn that's nice for them. But I thought youtube only reviews don't count?
I see 83 on metacritic with 39 reviews so far.
I also think this is a great way to create a bond between the player and Trico. Much like it is training a real pet.
I imagine that target wishlist plus 5% red card thing still works?Man, this game is shipping and I have a base PS4.
It's going to be really hard holding out until I get a pro, are there any good deals out there now?
Think your missing out on something special personally.I've only followed this game from a distances, but I had a passing interest in it. After reading three reviews - Jim Sterling, Wired, Kotaku - I'm going to pass. I'm not clear whether the issues they all ran into directing Trico were designed to reflect how temperamental even loving, loyal animals can be, or whether they are bugs (I'm guessing the former). But they would affect me the same way: I'd go bonkers with frustration. I just have zero interest in a game were you can find the right solution and then deal with an uncooperative AI companion, even if that's the design. Everything else looks quite appealing, and I don't mind the dated visuals.
Amazing that folks who have been breathlessly waiting for this game seem only interested in focusing on the negative reviews as justification for being a disappointment, while ignoring the glowing reviews the game is getting. Mind numbing.
With the amount of technical issues with the base PS4 I honestly can not take anyone who gives it a 10/10 seriously.
I really think reviews need to at the least review with the base PS4.
It's exactly this kind of thing that makes me think I'll dislike this game... I can't stand bad companion AI. If Resi 4 didn't have that terrible young girl to look after it'd be an amazing game.
I don't get the whole 'ignore these aspects and it's a 10'. I know it gets alot of love here so I'm not bashing the game but I've gotta admit it's reading things like this, which really put me off buying it.
Yeah that sums me up pretty much haha
It seems (and again I only have read a few cherry picked impressions, both positive and negative) that beside technical hiccups that may or may not be patched (fps in the 20s at times being the most obvious on OG PS4), the main problem is possibly a "feature" Ueda wanted to put in the game: A somewhat "organic" relation to Trico where he will not always (and rather not, more often at the beginning) donwhat you ask himbto do and you might have to take extraneous steps to coerce him instead of just "do this, go there".
Sounds like some people embraced that relation and let it develop, while others seemed put off by it and chose to fight it?
It seems (and again I only have read a few cherry picked impressions, both positive and negative) that beside technical hiccups that may or may not be patched (fps in the 20s at times being the most obvious on OG PS4), the main problem is possibly a "feature" Ueda wanted to put in the game: A somewhat "organic" relation to Trico where he will not always (and rather not, more often at the beginning) donwhat you ask himbto do and you might have to take extraneous steps to coerce him instead of just "do this, go there".
Sounds like some people embraced that relation and let it develop, while others seemed put off by it and chose to fight it?
It seems (and again I only have read a few cherry picked impressions, both positive and negative) that beside technical hiccups that may or may not be patched (fps in the 20s at times being the most obvious on OG PS4), the main problem is possibly a "feature" Ueda wanted to put in the game: A somewhat "organic" relation to Trico where he will not always (and rather not, more often at the beginning) donwhat you ask himbto do and you might have to take extraneous steps to coerce him instead of just "do this, go there".
Sounds like some people embraced that relation and let it develop, while others seemed put off by it and chose to fight it?
Witcher 3 was a glitchy mess that led to multiple restarts but was the goty for me so I think I will manage with tlg if it hits the highs points witcher did. Have a ps4 pro so shouldn't be too effected by the frame issues.
I've only followed this game from a distances, but I had a passing interest in it. After reading three reviews - Jim Sterling, Wired, Kotaku - I'm going to pass. I'm not clear whether the issues they all ran into directing Trico were designed to reflect how temperamental even loving, loyal animals can be, or whether they are bugs (I'm guessing the former). But they would affect me the same way: I'd go bonkers with frustration. I just have zero interest in a game were you can find the right solution and then deal with an uncooperative AI companion, even if that's the design. Everything else looks quite appealing, and I don't mind the dated visuals.
This thread is exactly like the FF XV review thread. Trying so hard to make an 84 and an 82 look as bad scores.
I'm pretty much the same on 10/10 reviews. I have yet to see gaming perfection, though some have come really damn close
It seems (and again I only have read a few cherry picked impressions, both positive and negative) that beside technical hiccups that may or may not be patched (fps in the 20s at times being the most obvious on OG PS4), the main problem is possibly a "feature" Ueda wanted to put in the game: A somewhat "organic" relation to Trico where he will not always (and rather not, more often at the beginning) donwhat you ask himbto do and you might have to take extraneous steps to coerce him instead of just "do this, go there".
Sounds like some people embraced that relation and let it develop, while others seemed put off by it and chose to fight it?
I don't expect modern reviewers to understand Ueda's vision so I'm not really perturbed by certain negative reviews.
Yeah, I was referring to OpenCritic.
So Metacritic weighs review sites now? That's an interesting concept.
10/10 doesn't mean perfect.