is this bad? someone please explain in DBZ terms
This may be OK, and the Switchs high-definition visuals may still be satisfying to a lot of gamers, who will also appreciate its dual purpose of being played in the home as a console and on the run as a portable system. But the Kyoto-based Japanese company was in such a rush to replace its failing Wii U that it couldnt wait for the updated Pascal version of the graphics technology, sources told us. This means that the Switch doesnt have as much visual horsepower as the PS4 when played on a television, and it may not be able to handle 4K graphics, either. If Nintendo had waited for Pascal, it would have had to push back the launch date of the Switch. Were not so sure if the Switch is weaker than the Xbox One, as the performance may be close.
Everyone saw Zelda Switch. The only big jumps will be in Mario's platforming.so, is it closer to the Wii U than the Xbone now?
Uhh, rather it is Maxwell or Pascal, it doesn't tell you how powerful the system is. One is just on a smaller process and is much more energy efficient than the other.
it wouldn't make sense to use maxwell on 28nm on a portable. That would just be dumb and this console is dead before arrival.
this quote doesn't make any sense
is this bad? someone please explain in DBZ terms
Bolded is ???.
Pascal is a die-shrink of Maxwell, what is this paragraph even. This is a nonsensical quote that makes zero sense.
it honestly means nothing. We have other good sources saying otherwise. Honestly we have a month to find out.
Dean Tak is solid writer, and his sources could be good, but that article was so poorly written it hurt my head.
We honestly have no idea if anything is true. Less than 4 weeks, I think we can wait.
Does this make it appropriate to post SuperMetalDave reaction GIFs or not?
Dude, also said the NX would use AMD chips.
The right way to go is assume disappointment with nintendo and hardware power.it honestly means nothing. We have other good sources saying otherwise. Honestly we have a month to find out.
Dean Tak is solid writer, and his sources could be good, but that article was so poorly written it hurt my head.
We honestly have no idea if anything is true. Less than 4 weeks, I think we can wait.
both of these are the right way to go about this.
this quote doesn't make any sense
Lmao best one yetTrunks and Goten thought they perfected the fusion but got fat Gotenks instead.
Freak, smartphones will end up catching up to the Switch in power >.>
Added another paragraph to the OP. Basically said Nintendo wanted to move from Wii U and couldn't wait on the newer chips. Speculated that it might be closer to Xbox One but not sure.
This may be OK, and the Switch’s high-definition visuals may still be satisfying to a lot of gamers, who will also appreciate its dual purpose of being played in the home as a console and on the run as a portable system. But the Kyoto-based Japanese company was in such a rush to replace its failing Wii U that it couldn’t wait for the updated Pascal version of the graphics technology, sources told us. This means that the Switch doesn’t have as much visual horsepower as the PS4 when played on a television, and it may not be able to handle 4K graphics, either. If Nintendo had waited for Pascal, it would have had to push back the launch date of the Switch. We’re not so sure if the Switch is weaker than the Xbox One, as the performance may be close.
Started reading the article, got to that, laughed.
Yeah, I'm taking this with the truck load of salt. They probably don't know what they are talking about. Probably talking about information based on dev kits.
That makes no sense.. Its not stronger to put out PS4 visuals but closer to Xbox One..??? When Xbox One and PS4 already close.. the fuck? lolAdded another paragraph to the OP. Basically said Nintendo wanted to move from Wii U and couldn't wait on the newer chips. Speculated that it might be closer to Xbox One but not sure.
I hope most of you guys are not serious.
Pascal vs Maxwell is not about the graphical power.
It's more about power comsumption. This article is.. questionable.
I thought the writing was a bit off as well... Its one thing to report on a story like this, but the article seemed overwhelmingly negative. I don't follow this guy normally, but is he normally more objective?
I don't believe anyone at this point.
Added another paragraph to the OP. Basically said Nintendo wanted to move from Wii U and couldn't wait on the newer chips. Speculated that it might be closer to Xbox One but not sure.
Were guessing that AMD will supply the main processor for the upcoming Nintendo machine.
Bamboo 竹;226614915 said:But... But It had the power of a PS4 in my dreams.
Then lol, they're talking out of their asses. No track record, etc.
Still though...One Month.
I don't believe anyone at this point.