• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2017 |OT1| From Russia with Love

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
Since McCain confirms that he submitted the intel to the FBI, it can't be true that the intel was generated internally to teach Trump some critical thinking skills, since McCain submitted it from an external source, the allegedly credible former M16 member.

Regardless of whether the report turns out to be true or not, I believe this NBC story is false or a misconstruance of some other document.

I thought it was confirmed that the FBI already had parts of the intel prior to McCain giving them the June version of the memos?

Relevant passage from the NBC article

Multiple officials say that the summary was included in the material prepared for the briefers, but the senior official told NBC News that the briefing was oral and no actual documents were left with the Trump team in New York. During the briefing, the president-elect was not briefed on the contents of the summary .

"Intel and law enforcement officials agree that none of the investigations have found any conclusive or direct link between Trump and the Russian government period," the senior official said.

According to the senior official, the two-page summary about the unsubstantiated material made available to the briefers was to provide context, should they need it, to draw the distinction for Trump between analyzed intelligence and unvetted "disinformation."

The briefers also had available to them unvetted "disinformation" about the Clinton Foundation, although that was not orally shared with Trump

That makes it sound like they had it on hand to show the distinction between analyzed intelligence and unvetted information.
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
I thought it was confirmed that the FBI already had parts of the intel prior to McCain giving them the June version of the memos?

That's what CNN's reporting said last night. The FBI already had up to August when McCain went to them with what he had.

CNN has also learned that on December 9, Senator John McCain gave a full copy of the memos -- dated from June through December, 2016 -- to FBI Director James Comey. McCain became aware of the memos from a former British diplomat who had been posted in Moscow. But the FBI had already been given a set of the memos compiled up to August 2016, when the former MI6 agent presented them to an FBI official in Rome, according to national security officials.

Basically he delivered to them September to December, which they didn't already have, in addition to a few that they already did.

Relevant passage from the NBC article



That makes it sound like they had it on hand to show the distinction between analyzed intelligence and unvetted information.

Right now only NBC seems to be saying that, and it's come from what looks to be their Moscow correspondent. Unless another news organization confirms it might be good to take with a grain of salt since right now everyone's confirming CNN's version.

Also:

@CJH_News
The BBC's Paul Wood, a respected foreign correspondent, says he has another source claiming multiple #Trump tapes exist. This story has legs

So there might be something to the BuzzFeed leaks, especially if this guy really has a source that isn't the one McCain and the others have.
 
Megyn Kelly reported two months ago that Trump got debate questions ahead of time.

C16Pg8mXAAc46VI.jpg
 

sc0la

Unconfirmed Member
Megyn Kelly reported two months ago that Trump got debate questions ahead of time.

C16Pg8mXAAc46VI.jpg
His question wasn't hypothetical "can you imagine what would happen if trump got the questions"* his answer "the biggest story in the history of stories"* was completely made up however.

(*Both paraphrasing)
 
Obama was not informed about these documents until December.

Is that confirmed? I wouldn't admit to knowing about it either if I was Obama and I made that mistake.

Obama was extremely confident that Clinton would win and as a Democrat trying to play fair, didn't want to seem like he was influencing the election on his own by revealing such information (he could have forced the IRS to reveal orange shit's tax returns).

The report only scratches the surface, orange turd has done far worse than what we can imagine.

Not wanting to seem partisan is one thing (Comey says hello though). Refusing to inform the public of a pertinent national security threat about a candidate before a presidential election is another.

I mean seriously, if this situation (taken as true) doesn't justify presidential intervention then what would? Does the candidate actually need to commit treason or kill somebody before the President can talk about it? Surely we can agree that a line exists and that this crosses it. This isn't personal details like a child out of wedlock or a drinking problem or some other kind of secret personal problem. This is direct collusion with a foreign power.
 
The BBC's Paul Wood says there is multiple tapes. Ben Judah says the US intelligence community says there are multiple tapes in multiple places. Thing is, how many of these tapes are held by russians that don't want their puppet president impeached so he can lift sanctions for them
 

Mike M

Nick N
Is it multiple tapes *in* multiple places, or multiple tapes *of* multiple places? I took the comment to mean that he was recorded in more than one location on more than one occasion.
 
Can Republicans reject this idiot and demand Trump push someone like Nikki Haley or something ?

Seriously you have the White House. Fucking use it to prop up republicans with a future for god's sake
 
The BBC's Paul Wood says there is multiple tapes. Ben Judah says the US intelligence community says there are multiple tapes in multiple places. Thing is, how many of these tapes are held by russians that don't want their puppet president impeached so he can lift sanctions for them

Probably a bunch of bad ideas...nevermind.
 
Can Republicans reject this idiot and demand Trump push someone like Nikki Haley or something ?

Seriously you have the White House. Fucking use it to prop up republicans with a future for god's sake
Given what happened to the last Secretary of State who ran for president, maybe they're trying to keep it away from promising Republicans lol
 

studyguy

Member
I expect these tapes to get out, if they exist as described. It also won't make a damn bit of difference.

I'd like to look at the historical precedents set by our previous president first. What's the closest approximation I can get to a room full of hookers pissing on each other in front of a president fam? pfft...
 

studyguy

Member
I'm sure quite a lot of presidents have done crazy sex acts

Trump was just the only one dumb enough to be filmed

Oh no doubt. It's one thing to say JFK fucked on the regular, LBJ whipped his dick out for shits and giggles, but the one up they have on Trump is none of them was under threat of the act coming out on film.
 
This is just a preview of how these scandals will go though, and there's a ton of truth to "Where there's smoke, there's fire" as far as most Americans are concerned. And you can't effectively argue that attacks are politically motivated since the general viewpoint is "let them talk, just create jobs."

Trump will never let these attacks go, but everyone will get fed up with that quickly. I heard 3 tables of Trump voters at a restaurant after the Streep thing talking about how much they want him to shut the fuck up and act normal. They'll be disappointed of course, but it's wearing on people.
 

sc0la

Unconfirmed Member
I'm still surprised that people knew about some of the stuff leaked yesterday since June 2015.
I mean idk then it would be easy to hear it and say "sounds like bullshit" and not spread farther a year and a half ago.

Like pizzagate which nobody paid any attention to... wait.

edit: to be clear pizzagate is still bullshit and who knows if the tapes are. there are definitely numerous bright red flags regarding trump and Russia I could give two shits about a sex tape.
 

studyguy

Member
I'd like to dream that the scenario is GOP is huddling to figure out how to leak and jettison Trump, leave Pence in place. What will probably happen is some massive damage control, but w/e. Memes became dreams in 2016, lets keep the ball rolling to 2017.
 

mo60

Member
I mean idk then it would be easy to hear it and say "sounds like bullshit" and not spread farther a year and a half ago.

Like pizzagate which nobody paid any attention to... wait.

edit: to be clear pizzagate is still bullshit and who knows if the tapes are. there are definitely numerous bright red flags regarding trump and Russia I could give two shits about a sex tape.

I don't think the sex tape/golden shower thing will matter much in the end. It's trump connections to russia and anything else he does while in office that will sink him eventually.
 

sc0la

Unconfirmed Member
I don't think the sex tape/golden shower thing will matter much in the end. It's trump connections to russia and anything else he does while in office that will sink him eventually.
Yes. What I was trying to convey was, you didn't hear about a golden shower tape more broadly in June 2015 even though some people did because it sounds like bullshit. You are hearing about it more now because it appearing in an intel report, written oral, even as a cautionary note lends additional "credence" to spread it. The ultimate factuality didn't change, but the context has.
 
So wait, if the GOP controls the committee why are they opening up the documents for everybody to look at?

It's important to consider who runs such committees when the controlling party controls other offices. When in power, cracks in coalitions form. Is this committee staffed by Republicans who think like alt-right people or Republicans who are still in A Cold War mindset?

The former means the committee will quash the story. The latter means they're blowing it up.
 
Half-kidding. This shit will just happen again though when half the country doesn't vote and a quarter are fucking guinea pigs. Removing Trump doesn't solve the problems with the right.
It won't. When Trump goes down in flames they'll just say he wasn't a true conservative. Look at how quickly they threw Nixon and Bush under the bus.

Whereas just about every Democratic president at least has some positive legacy. Hell even our nominees - Gore and Kerry both made significant contributions to our culture and politics after losing, and Clinton already has a place in history. What has McCain done since holing himself back up in Arizona? Or Dole? Or Romney?
 
Banish Cory Booker from the party forever if he votes to confirm Rex. His questioning of him was beyond disgusting. Spent more time congratulating and sucking his dick for being such a tolerate, good man than anything else.

But no any dislike of him is "purity testing".
 

avaya

Member
Banish Cory Booker from the party forever if he votes to confirm Rex. His questioning of him was beyond disgusting. Spent more time congratulating and sucking his dick for being such a tolerate, good man than anything else.

But no any dislike of him is "purity testing".

No it isn't. Booker was horrendous here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom