• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

North American Nintendo Switch Lineup

Scrawnton

Member
A lot of people in this thread must not have seen how good Snipperclips is. The true sleeper hit launch title. I'll take than over anything I had on the other two modern systems at launch.
 

El Topo

Member
Which context?

I feel Nintendo is dropping the ball here by launching before they have more games ready. That's all I'm saying. It would be completely different if they waited until Mario Kart 8 and ARMS were ready, for instance. Not game changers, but those are very solid releases that would mean at least a handful of excellent launch titles.

Someone suggested that the PS4 lineup was just as bad or worse. I'm saying that it wasn't. That's all.

I mostly agree with you. I don't think you can apply the same standards to a console launching mid-gen though. I'd expect more from a mid-gen launch. Consoles don't launch in a vacuum.
 

Metroidvania

People called Romanes they go the house?
I really don't understand the 'But the PS4 launched with no games' argument.

If we're in a vacuum of simply comparing launch titles, then sure, it's relevant.

But in the greater scope of the market, and trying to get people to buy the new Nintendo console, you can't do analysis in a vacuum and expect the consumer to take it seriously. Yes, PS4 had a relatively low 1st part situation at launch. However, it also had a helluva lot of next-gen hype, and enough decent-to-good 3rd party support (arguably) to appeal to the mass consumer.

Outside of Zelda, who is the Switch targeting with its launch window titles?

Maybe VC stuff, but we've heard literally nothing about that....and given that Ninty's online infrastructure isn't going to be done until this fall....

Better than the 19 month wait for Kart on Wii U...

Waiting 2+ months for a port of an old game with the new feature being a battle mode?

When having it right away would definitely provide a decently-sized bigger punch to the system launch?

I mean, sure it's better, but it's still not good.
 
Waiting 2+ months for a port of an old game with the new feature being a battle mode?

When having it right away would definitely provide a decently-sized bigger punch to the system launch?

I mean, sure it's better, but it's still not good.

This is what I don't get it. I'm pretty sure if Mario Kart 8 Deluxe was a launch title along side
Zelda/Super Bomberman R/Arms/Snipperclips/1-2 Switch and supposedly Disgaea 5 (which I don't know if that's confirmed yet), it wouldn't be THAT bad.

[EDIT] It makes no sense how a 2 year port can't be a Day 1 game. Skyrim I get considering how much has to be downgraded for it to run smoothly etc, but like Mario Kart? c'mon man.
 

Riddler

Member
I'm fine I guess with the "Launch Window" approach but I do wish the had 1 more big title at launch day.

Zelda, Snipperclips(it really looks adorablely cute), Bomberman day one
 

Griss

Member
I thought the PS4 launch day was fantastic. I was playing those games for months.

AC: Black Flag was a GOTY contender (came 4th for me).
Resogun was the indie game of the year and free with PS+, which basically justified the cost of the service for a year from day 1.
Battlefield 4 was fantastic, as the new console allowed for 64 player online at the same time, something I hadn't experienced before.
Fifa 14 was a very good game, and the leap in visual fidelity was certainly noticeable and worthwhile.
Flower was a port, but a port of a great little game.
Killzone Shadow Fall was a graphical showcase with great multiplayer (and a shockingly poor single play campaign, sure.)

That's 6 games I enjoyed, right there on launch day. I got hundreds and hundreds of hours out of those games. And many of them justified the purchase of new tech with new, better visuals and features (like the aforementioned 64 player mode).

Switch has Zelda, which I can play on Wii U. Therefore it has nothing exclusive of interest for me. Also, it doesn't have that 'Wow! New graphical standard!' sensation to carry mediocre games like most new consoles do. How anyone can compare the two launches is beyond me.
 

18-Volt

Member
Didn't dev kits go out to third party devs very late/only to a small handful of devs? The reason Sony and Microsoft get such strong 3rd party support is because they literally design their consoles with input from their devs. They bend over backwards to appease the devs for the promise of their support. Nintendo has a looooong history of not giving a damn about 3rd party devs (or actively screwing them over). This has squat to do with devs not liking image. Nintendo never courts devs. Sony and Microsoft do.

I don't think sony "courts" with devs, they're very similar to Nintendo in that regards. Sony ahd the exact same thing happening to Switch with Vita. Sony did all they could but third party refused to make games for the system. Why? Handhelds are toys. This is the opinion of most of the western third parties. Sony tried to change their minds by making a badass FPS for the system but it failed to change the minds.

Do you really think Sony acted differently for their two consoles? I don't think so, Sony isn't a company that enjoys losing money. Handhelds are cursed. There was nothing they could do about Vita. DS sold more than 150 million units and barely got western support while overflooding with Japanese games. But now we're living in an age where only things that matter are FPSs, CRPGs and sandbox game. If you don't have them, you're bound to fail.

You really think this thing can run those games when it's running Zelda, a Wii U up port at 900p 30fps? I have some bad news for you...

Didn't we get Modern Warfare games on Wii? You could do wonders with downporting, as long as someone paying for it.
 

KoopaTheCasual

Junior Member
I don't think sony "courts" with devs, they're very similar to Nintendo in that regards. Sony ahd the exact same thing happening to Switch with Vita. Sony did all they could but third party refused to make games for the system. Why? Handhelds are toys. This is the opinion of most of the western third parties. Sony tried to change their minds by making a badass FPS for the system but it failed to change the minds.

Do you really think Sony acted differently for their two consoles? I don't think so, Sony isn't a company that enjoys losing money. Handhelds are cursed. There was nothing they could do about Vita. DS sold more than 150 million units and barely got western support while overflooding with Japanese games. But now we're living in an age where only things that matter are FPSs, CRPGs and sandbox game. If you don't have them, you're bound to fail.



Didn't we get Modern Warfare games on Wii? You could do wonders with downporting, as long as someone paying for it.
Factually incorrect. Here is Vita (surprisingly strong) launch lineup. Count the Day-1 third party games:

SCEA Launch Day Titles

Escape Plan (PSN Only)
Hot Shots Golf: World Invitational
Hustle Kings (PSN Only)
Little Deviants
ModNation Racers: Road Trip
Super StarDust Delta (PSN only)
UNCHARTED: Golden Abyss
wipEout 2048

Launch Window Titles

Gravity Rush
MLB 12 The Show
Reality Fighters
Unit 13

Third Party Publisher Launch Day Titles

Army Corps of Hell Square Enix, Inc.
Asphalt Injection Ubisoft, Inc.
BEN10 GALACTIC RACING D3 Publisher of America
Blazblue: Continuum Shift EXTEND Aksys Games Localization, Inc.
Dungeon Hunter Alliance Ubisoft, Inc.
Dynasty Warriors Next Tecmo Koei America Corporation
F1 2011 Codemasters
EA SPORTS FIFA Soccer Electronic Arts, Inc.
Lumines Electronic Symphony Ubisoft, Inc.
Michael Jackson The Experience Ubisoft, Inc.
Plants vs. Zombies (PSN Only) Sony Online Entertainment LLC
Rayman Origins Ubisoft, Inc.
Shinobido 2: Revenge of Zen Namco Bandai Games America Inc.
Tales of Space: Mutant Blobs (PSN Only) Drinkbox Studios
Touch My Katamari Namco Bandai Games America Inc.
Ultimate Marvel vs Capcom 3 Capcom Entertainment, Inc.
Virtua Tennis 4: World Tour Edition

Vita had STRONG 3rd party support at launch, but then that all ended, when the Vita sold like an overpriced turd, and eventually 3rd parties fled. Sony courted them just like PS4, and all its past systems, because they understand their importance. The sales of Vita just couldn't justify continued support. The premise of your argument is simply wrong.

As for the Modern Warfare port, wasn't that several years into the Wii selling crazy well, which made 3rd parties want to put in extra work to make the port function on worse hardware? That too, led to disappointing returns, so 3rd parties stopped putting in extra work.
 

Cwarrior

Member
the games & all of the console features cleary aren't ready for March, why even launch this, they should wait till November, maybe it's keep investors happy.

PS4 had no games for over 1.5 years at least, but that's no excuse for the switch having a shitty launch.
 

saskuatch

Member
the games & all of the console features cleary aren't ready for March, why even launch this, they should wait till November, maybe it's keep investors happy.

PS4 had no games for over 1.5 years at least, but that's no excuse for the switch having a shitty launch.

The ps4 had plenty of games over 1.5 years, just most of them the best versions of large multi platform games many of them system sellers for buyers looking to transition to next gen. The switch does not have the third party support in its 1st year to even come close to the ps4.
 
PS4 had no games for over 1.5 years at least, but that's no excuse for the switch having a shitty launch.
I wonder what the hell everyone was playing then, because I could have sworn there were well over 100 games on the ps4 within the first year alone.
God damn, folks. Take your blinders off. We are looking at a console with literally less than 25 games announced for its entire first year, and less than ten in the launch window. That's fucking abysmal.
 
What the Breath of the Wild trailer taught me was that having Zelda can cover up a lot of mistakes. The overall lineup actually looks solid though. Shin Megami Tensei, Xenoblade and Fire Emblem all speak for themselves. No matter the capacity, whether they be spinoff, mainline, or something else entirely, when you see those names, you can expect a good outing from them. The new game from the Bravely Default developers really stands out as well. I'm in for Zelda day one, and think we'll see more of the rumored games like Smash Bros. and the Mario RPG start to show up around E3. Even if not though, I'm still more than happy with the games they showed off last night. The games, the most important part of a system, were there. And the price is right for me, just what I expected. The only thing they really have to do for me at this point is find a way, even if that means by way of a miracle, to convince me that I should pay for their online service.
 

slit

Member
the games & all of the console features cleary aren't ready for March, why even launch this, they should wait till November, maybe it's keep investors happy.

PS4 had no games for over 1.5 years at least, but that's no excuse for the switch having a shitty launch.

Clearly and what I don't understand is what the fuck else have they been doing? How do you go from having dedicated console and dedicated handheld teams transferring to one platform and still not have your shit together with releases especially since they haven't been doing much else for a while now? It's like they just gave up.
 

saskuatch

Member
The scary thing is, they announced that they delayed the system to have more games at launch.

I guess their original plan was to release it last holiday season with bomber man and 1 2 switch as the system sellers......It more so sounds like they delayed the launch so they could have A game at launch.
 

Durden77

Member
As much as I want it now, I don't see why they don't at least wait until April so they could have Mario Kart with it. They don't even have a strong multiplayer title at launch with a system that's controller can break in half.

If they really are going full force on combining their console and handheld markets though, then I just hope this gets as strong as their handhelds do. I remember the 3DS's launch being oretty awful but look at it's library now. Hell look at any of their handheld's library.
 

B.K.

Member
Do we know if I am Setsuna will be physical or digital only? I'm sure it's been answered, but I was gone all day and the thread is too big to go through.
 

jonno394

Member
Looking at what Nintendo have to offer so far, I'm not expecting much more than 2 new games at e3 - likely retros title and pikmin 4 (Mario will be their big title)

I honestly hope they announce things like Kid Icarus and Luigis Mansion 2 Remaster to just put something on the calendar even if it's just more ports.
 
And speaking of ports, I thought everyone was talking about how the Switch was going to unify their console and handheld software lineups...so where's the Pokemon and all the ports of other 3DS titles for people who skipped the 3DS?

LMAO at 1-2 Switch being a $50(!!!!) title as well. A two player 'party' game that's less versatile than a cheap pack of playing cards, and which only runs on a $300 piece of hardware with a couple hours battery life. "It's a videogame where you ignore the video part! It's a party game that plays like a free drinking game...but for fifty dollars. Totally great for parties, or even after parties!"

My guess is that many of those devs are probably about to hit the HD wall.

Yeah, that's a ridiculous price for that game.
 

rezn0r

Member
For the record, the Wikipedia list of PS4 NA titles (if we're going to assume it's semi-accurate) from Nov '13 - Nov '14 is 177 titles. People saying PS4 & XB1 had nothing to play for the first year are lying to themselves or smoking some good shit.
 

Morts

Member
I'm really surprised they didn't trot out some of the expected indie/Kickstarter stuff like Stardew Valley, Axiom Verge, Bloodstained, Yooka-Laylee, etc.

It wouldn't make much of a difference since I can get most of that on my PS4 right now, but it would've filled out their lineup.
 
Looks like Nintendo is targeting the Vita audience now. Interesting choice.

DVecL0l.gif
 
Hey Nintendo:

If Wii Sports would not have been included with every Wii, both Wii Sports and the Wii would not have been so popular.

Include 1-2-Switch with every Switch or prepare to fail. You need people to play that game in order for it to become viral, and very few people are going to buy it because...well, who would buy that?
 
I know launch lineups are tough, but Nintendo delayed the Switch so it wouldn't have droughts...it seems like they should have delayed it until the summer because those early months look mighty lean.
 
If launch day had one strong title besides Zelda, it wouldn't look so rough.

But really, by the end of the year there are 4-5 games that I really want to play. About the same as PS4. Would it be nice to have more? Sure, but I'm not getting bent out of shape over it like I initially was.

I just really hope some of those rumors, particularly BG&E2, are true.
 

13ruce

Banned
the games & all of the console features cleary aren't ready for March, why even launch this, they should wait till November, maybe it's keep investors happy.

PS4 had no games for over 1.5 years at least, but that's no excuse for the switch having a shitty launch.

I bet your point about the investor part is true in march Nintendo's fiscal year ends i bet they want a bit of launch profit to crack the revenue up a bit or make the loss a little bit less.

I bet during holiday they will do a price cut and pack Zelda and other games in.

And yeah i regret getting ps4 at launch should have got it when bloodborne launched would have saved me a few bucks anyway i love my ps4 now got a bunch of fantastic games on it.
 

jroc74

Phone reception is more important to me than human rights
I consider the Switch as a portable console that you can plug on your TV. So it's main role is being a portable console. Therefore, I would compare it more to the PS Vita. In that case here was the launch line up for the Vita:

Release:
Escape Plan (PSN Only)
Hot Shots Golf: World Invitational
Hustle Kings (PSN Only)
Little Deviants
ModNation Racers: Road Trip
Super Stardust Delta (PSN only)
Uncharted: Golden Abyss
WipEout 2048
Army Corps of Hell
Asphalt Injection
Ben 10: Galactic Racing
BlazBlue: Continuum Shift II Extend
Dungeon Hunter Alliance
Dynasty Warriors Next
F1 2011
FIFA Soccer
Lumines Electronic Symphony
Michael Jackson: The Experience
Plants vs. Zombies (PSN Only)
Rayman Origins
Shinobido 2: Revenge of Zen
Tales from Space: Mutant Blobs Attack (PSN Only)
Touch My Katamari
Ultimate Marvel Vs. Capcom 3
Virtua Tennis 4: World Tour Edition



Launch window:

Gravity Rush
MLB 12 The Show
Reality Fighters
Unit 13
LEGO Harry Potter: Years 5-7
Disgaea 3: Absence of Detention
Ninja Gaiden Sigma Plus
Ridge Racer
Silent Hill Book of Memories
Supremacy MMA: Unrestricted



I'll let you draw your own conclusions.

Damn...

PS4 Launch Lineup: (these were all DAY 1 releases)

Angry Birds Star Wars
Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag
Battlefield 4
Blacklight: Retribution
Call of Duty: Ghosts
Contrast
DC Universe Online
DiveKick
FIFA 14* EA Sports Retail
Flower (Cross-Buy) [8] ThatGameCompany PSN
Injustice: Gods Among Us Ultimate Edition
Just Dance 2014
Killzone Shadow Fall
Knack
LEGO: Marvel Super Heroes
Madden NFL 25
NBA 2K14
NBA Live 14
Need for Speed: Rivals
Resogun
Skylanders Swap Force
Sound Shapes
Super Motherload
Trine 2: The Complete Story
Warframe

And at least 3 of those PS4 games are F2P.

Yea....the Switch launch line up looks kinda bad.
 

saskuatch

Member
I bet your point about the investor part is true in march Nintendo's fiscal year ends i bet they want a bit of launch profit to crack the revenue up a bit or make the loss a little bit less.

I bet during holiday they will do a price cut and pack Zelda and other games in.

And yeah i regret getting ps4 at launch should have got it when bloodborne launched would have saved me a few bucks anyway i love my ps4 now got a bunch of fantastic games on it.

I loved getting a ps4 at launch, it was right before the Canadian dollar tanked and everything went up lol.
 
I think the WII U launch game were better only by a tad as Zelda helps Switch a bit but that isnt exclusive to Switch.

Here is the entire Launch Day of WII U Ill note which ones I bought.

Assassin's Creed III
Batman: Arkham City - Armored Edition ( Pretty fun port I enjoyed it)
Ben 10: Omniverse
Call of Duty: Black Ops II ( It was COD Nuff said)
Chasing Aurora
Darksiders II
Epic Mickey 2: The Power of Two
ESPN Sports Connection
FIFA Soccer 13
Funky Barn
Game Party Champions
Just Dance 4
Little Inferno
Madden NFL 13
Mass Effect 3: Special Edition ( Good port of a meh game)
Mighty Switch Force! Hyper Drive Edition
Nano Assault Neo
NBA 2K13
New Super Mario Bros. U (Great Mario Game)
Ninja Gaiden 3: Razor's Edge (Rented it not bad)
Nintendo Land
Rabbids Land
Scribblenauts Unlimited
Sing Party
Skylanders: Giants
Sonic & All-Stars Racing Transformed (Great Kart Racer in absences of Mario Kart)
Tank! Tank! Tank!
Tekken Tag Tournament 2: Wii U Edition ( Hell Yea)
Transformers: Prime – The Game
Trine 2: Director's Cut
Warriors Orochi 3 Hyper
Wipeout 3
Your Shape: Fitness Evolved 2013
ZombiU (Meh Interesting concept but bland game)



Much better line up as it game games of vast genres.
 
Another thing, what is with all of these ridiculously high priced games that should be $20 digital titles?

Super Bomberman R is $60
Minecraft is $60
1, 2, Switch is $50
Ultra Street Fighter 2 is $40
Puyo Puyo Tetris is $40

Devs know many day 1 buyers are rich :\
 

Elfstruck

Member
the games & all of the console features cleary aren't ready for March, why even launch this, they should wait till November, maybe it's keep investors happy.

PS4 had no games for over 1.5 years at least, but that's no excuse for the switch having a shitty launch.

What the fk did I just read? It's amazing that people still have this mindset even though PS4 had plenty of games in its first year.

Regardless, I don't understand why Nintendo has to release Switch in March though. Why not wait until the Holidays and bundle it with Mario, Zelda, Splatoon 2, MK8 Deluxe? I bet it would sell a bunch.
 
PS4 launched with

What the PS4 launched with is completely irrelevant outside of list warz. Nintendo is coming from a failed console and they are trying a huge gamble and third party devs are not going to risk shit without seeing first if it's a hit. So yeah, it's going to be mostly Nintendo games for a while and I'm not sure how anyone expected otherwise. Perhaps more importantly in this comparison considering this, all of the PS4 exclusive titles it launched with sucked ass except Resogun. At least Nintendo has Zelda.
 
What the PS4 launched with is completely irrelevant outside of list warz. Nintendo is coming from a failed console and they are trying a huge gamble and third party devs are not going to risk shit without seeing first if it's a hit. So yeah, it's going to be mostly Nintendo games for a while and I'm not sure how anyone expected otherwise. Perhaps more importantly in this comparison considering this, all of the PS4 exclusive titles it launched with sucked ass except Resogun. At least Nintendo has Zelda.
The point was to show a poster who claimed the other consoles had no games similar to the switch how wrong he is.
Also, why are you focused on exclusives, which Zelda is not? The switch has very few games that you can play on it, full stop. There is no good reason to single out exclusives when discussing launch titles unless your goal is to try and make the Switch look slightly less like the absolute dumpster fire it is.

Scratch that. Dumpster fires are actually more interesting than the launch lineup of the Switch.
 

Vanillalite

Ask me about the GAF Notebook
It's not big 3rd parties I am scratching my head over.

It's where are all of the indie games? In theory even at its power level it's modern architecture should mean it easily runs a lot of the common engines.

So why not try and get more indies on board to help fill the gap?

Why not be like hey we talked to the Stardew Valley guys and helped them get it running on the Switch. You know or Darkest Dungeon, Enter the Gungan, Hyper Light Drifter ect ect...
 
The point was to show a poster who claimed the other consoles had no games similar to the switch how wrong he is.
Also, why are you focused on exclusives, which Zelda is not? The switch has very few games that you can play on it, full stop. There is no good reason to single out exclusives when discussing launch titles unless your goal is to try and make the Switch look slightly less like the absolute dumpster fire it is.

Scratch that. Dumpster fires are actually more interesting than the launch lineup of the Switch.

Because I was talking about how wary third party devs are going to be before (if they ever do) they jump on a new Nintendo console after the Wii U happened. I'm focusing on exclusives for that reason, because unless you have way wrong expectations about this console then you know that for the time being exclusives are pretty much what you're getting for a start. If it breaks well, you're going to see bigger third party support later.

It's about expectation here really. What did you expect? Every publisher ever racing to put their games on the Switch? Or quality (IMO) Nintendo games for now with more to come at E3?
 
Top Bottom