So it's okay to be vilely racist and spout fascist propaganda if you're doing it for the gainz..
Worked for Trump
So it's okay to be vilely racist and spout fascist propaganda if you're doing it for the gainz..
....so he's an asshole, then.
What's that got to do with his right to speak?
Is harassing students and inciting violence a right?....so he's an asshole, then.
What's that got to do with his right to speak?
Milo has never worn a swastika or called for genocide. He is not a Nazi.
Yeah, it's hard. Doing the right thing is hard. It always feels like a losing battle. Shortcuts are tempting. But it still needs to be done. I don't know what else to say.
So add conman to the list? How do you nazis feel about being conned by a gay foreigner?
Is harassing students and inciting violence a right?
Wait why am I a Nazi again?
Or are we just throwing that term around like a pronoun at this point.
By the way, even in a country with free speech, there's always been a standard by which we reject speech we deem to be destructive to the public at large, like crying "fire" in a crowded theater. It's not hypocritical to suppress hate speech, and there's a long standing US court record in support of this.
He sexually harassed a trans student and forced her to leave her school.Is that what's happening?
Is that what's happening?
Hmmm I'll watch this. Always got an ear open for Hitchens
Harrassing and publicly humiliating people, especially members of the LGBT community, is kind of his gimmick.Is that what's happening?
Thanks.
It is addressed towards his supporters.
Dude used to wear an iron cross.
There exists a single photo of Milo wearing an iron cross necklace, taken I believe when he was a teenager. This does not prove he is currently a Nazi. In fact, the Iron Cross with out a superimposed swastika is not automatically a hate symbol. According to the Anti-Defamation League, which tracks hate symbols:
"The use of the Iron Cross in a non-racist context has greatly proliferated in the United States, to the point that an Iron Cross in isolation (i.e., without a superimposed swastika or without other accompanying hate symbols) cannot be determined to be a hate symbol."
Even if it had some kind of fascist significance for Milo at the time, he certainly doesn't wear it anymore. I also did dumb things when I was in high school -- I'm certainly glad I'm not held to all the beliefs I had back then.
This has gone from Nazis shouldn't expect to be greeted with peaceful protests, to rounding people up like Nazis want to do? Right. Wait, alt-right. ;-) If someone outs themselves as a Nazi, they should be treated as a Nazi. Social pariahs. If they go around inciting violence with their evil message, their free speech has consequences.
Harrassing and publicly humiliating people, especially members of the LGBT community, is kind of his gimmick.
And yet people still defend the shit he spews as free speech.
So what are your thoughts about Milo? Do you support him?
Blow and I agree. The Left are the new fascists. Follow dogma or be destroyed. I've voted liberal my whole life and these new liberals scare the hell out of me.
Blow and I agree. The Left are the new fascists. Follow dogma or be destroyed. I've voted liberal my whole life and these new liberals scare the hell out of me.
I disagree strongly with most of his views.
I do support his right to speak without being subjected to violence.
Blow and I agree. The Left are the new fascists. Follow dogma or be destroyed. I've voted liberal my whole life and these new liberals scare the hell out of me.
Hate speech that insights violence isn't a right.I disagree strongly with most of his views.
I do support his right to speak without being subjected to violence.
We can all agree that Dylan Roof was scary and bad, but he represents no risk to someone being able to safely pick up a pre-order at Gamestop.
You know- I think this may be my fav post in here so far. And I think the two exists, and to me- that's the beauty of Freedom of Speech. If people want to feel free to cling to the 1st, they have to be proud that consequence can exist. But hat consequence cannot come from the government. But perhaps a knuckle sandwich.Sure you can offend, but don't cry when no one comes to your rescue because your message is so abhorrent that people hate you. Free speech has consequences.
Blow and I agree. The Left are the new fascists. Follow dogma or be destroyed. I've voted liberal my whole life and these new liberals scare the hell out of me.
Blow and I agree. The Left are the new fascists. Follow dogma or be destroyed. I've voted liberal my whole life and these new liberals scare the hell out of me.
Do you support his freedom of speech when it can result in harm towards others?
I disagree strongly with most of his views.
I do support his right to speak without being subjected to violence.
That is some pretty strong revisionist stuff you have going on there yourself. America cared but had bigger problem or so they thought. They were coming off of the great depression. Stuck between interventionism and isolationism, alot of americans at the time had no idea how it was going to turn out early on.
Hind sight of course is 20/20 and you can judge after the fact but here is the truth, despite the handling of jewish people being public news in germany, the "final solution" did not filter out to the allies until after the war had started. The first report which spoke of a plan for the mass murder of Jews was smuggled out of Poland by the Bund (a Jewish socialist political organization) and reached England in the spring of 1942. At that time the attack on Pearl Harbor had already happened and America was in the war. SO to pose the idea that Americans didn't care so they opposed getting into the war is a revisionist line of thinking. Americans didn't even know.
Direct harassment, sure. Hate speech? Wrong. Unfortunately but it's true. People have to right to speech that makes them look like a complete dickhole. That's just how it is.Harassment and hate speech isn't free speech. That's not a right.
Hate speech that insights violence isn't a right.
Harassment and hate speech isn't free speech. That's not a right.
That's just how it is.
Direct harassment, sure. Hate speech? Wrong. Unfortunately but it's true. People have to right to speech that makes them look like a complete dickhole. That's just how it is.
Bingo.maybe that's why nazis get punched
I think what you wanted to say is that Blow is a genius game developer that made one of the most thoughtful and intelligent puzzle games of the last couple of years, but that you disagree with his political opinions.
As for Blow, he's wrong. I think we all know there's a difference between free speech and hate speech.
It is a very serious allegation that gets thrown around far too easily lately. Same thing is happening to the word 'fascist'.all these nazi purity tests