• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Horizon Zero Dawn Spoiler-free Impressions (for real this time)

Gurish

Member
a419ee5a_o.png

0eb59768_o.png


Putting the rest in the spoiler thread.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=230707320&postcount=695

Is this on a regular PS4? :O
 
Ok, for those that have the game and played it, I have some questions

1)I heard that the main missions, for the most part, have humans as enemies and knowing that human AI is pretty mad or mediocre at best, it kind of disappoints me.

2)Although the big machines are a treat to fight, the smaller ones are not so smart and you can easily cheese them by killing a dozen of them just of them just by hiding in the grass and not actually fighting them, which reminds me of AC of course, but I would have wanted this to be the case for only the humans in this game, not for the machines too.

3)Did someone find any Killzone references or easter eggs anywhere :p?Just say yes or no
and spoiler tag it please
 

SomTervo

Member
At the reveal of 2015, the Thunderjaw that Aloy fought with had already been previously attacked by another group.

Is that dynamic concept still in the game?

If you watch the video Miami posted (it's not very spoilery) you'll see that other humans are currently fighting the big enemy emergently.

I mean the other humans seem completely useless in a fight against this big enemy, but I guess in theory they could do some damage before you reach the thing.
 

Pit

Member
Ok, for those that have the game and played it, I have some questions

1)I heard that the main missions, for the most part, have humans as enemies and knowing that human AI is pretty mad or mediocre at best, it kind of disappoints me.

2)Although the big machines are a treat to fight, the smaller ones are not so smart and you can easily cheese them by killing a dozen of them just of them just by hiding in the grass and not actually fighting them, which reminds me of AC of course, but I would have wanted this to be the case for only the humans in this game, not for the machines too.

3)Did someone find any Killzone references or easter eggs anywhere :p?Just say yes or no
and spoiler tag it please

So 2 of those are statements.
 

jayu26

Member
Ok, for those that have the game and played it, I have some questions

1)I heard that the main missions, for the most part, have humans as enemies and knowing that human AI is pretty mad or mediocre at best, it kind of disappoints me.

2)Although the big machines are a treat to fight, the smaller ones are not so smart and you can easily cheese them by killing a dozen of them just of them just by hiding in the grass and not actually fighting them, which reminds me of AC of course, but I would have wanted this to be the case for only the humans in this game, not for the machines too.
"Those are not questions, professor".gif

1) I don't think you are fighting humans for "the most part" in the main missions. Why would you even think that?
 
Ok, for those that have the game and played it, I have some questions

1)I heard that the main missions, for the most part, have humans as enemies and knowing that human AI is pretty mad or mediocre at best, it kind of disappoints me.

2)Although the big machines are a treat to fight, the smaller ones are not so smart and you can easily cheese them by killing a dozen of them just of them just by hiding in the grass and not actually fighting them, which reminds me of AC of course, but I would have wanted this to be the case for only the humans in this game, not for the machines too.

3)Did someone find any Killzone references or easter eggs anywhere :p?Just say yes or no
and spoiler tag it please

You made two incorrect statements.... not questions.
 
"Those are not questions, professor".gif

1) I don't think you are fighting humans for "the most part" in the main missions. Why would you even think that?

Thanks for clarifying.

Because some reviewers in my country said that as a negative and I found it odd too.I trust those reviewers they're not lying or anything, so I really had to ask.

@Miami and Lamp that you finished the game,it would be great if you clarified too

Edit: Again sorry for the mistake above.The actual question was if someone encountered any of those things in my statements
 
Was this on Twitter or Youtube?

just say that some italian reviewer couldn't help himself to take a picture of it and made a news about it, dropping the "spoiler" directly in the title


Video of the crazy thunderjaw fight

https://vid.me/rAGi

Gifs posted in the spoiler thread.

oh my fucking god
 

SomTervo

Member
The outlier? It's an outlier for a reason.

I'm not saying I agree with it or anything. Just pointing out that some people did find this a problem. Being an outlier doesn't invalidate what someone says.

Why don't you find out for yourself when the game releases?
 
I'm not saying I agree with it or anything. Just pointing out that some people did find this a problem. Being an outlier doesn't invalidate what someone says.

Why don't you find out for yourself when the game releases?

I guess, but when 50 people say one thing and 1 person says another, 99% of the time the 50 are right and will mirror most everyone elses experience.
 

jayu26

Member
I'm not saying I agree with it or anything. Just pointing out that some people did find this a problem. Being an outlier doesn't invalidate what someone says.

Why don't you find out for yourself when the game releases?
Well statistically speaking there are times when you can disregard an outlier. Having said that I, have made my position on Eurogamer and USgamer clear in the review thread (which is that they are as valid as any other review). You can go read it.

Reviewers and gaffers have said the human AI is clearly not as good as robot AIs. I don't dispute that, specially when so many are saying it. But how many are saying "man, I wish I was not fighting mostly boring humans in the main missions". In this case if one or two reviewer complains about it but over 70 others don't than I will disregard it as outlier(s).
 

SomTervo

Member
I guess, but when 50 people say one thing and 1 person says another, 99% of the time the 50 are right and will mirror most everyone elses experience.
Well statistically speaking there are times when you can disregard an outlier. Having said that I, have made my position on Eurogamer and USgamer clear in the review thread (which is that they are as valid as any other review). You can go read it.

Reviewers and gaffers have said the human AI is clearly not as good as robot AIs. I don't dispute that, specially when so many are saying it. But how many are saying "man, I wish I was not fighting mostly boring humans in the main missions". In this case if one or two reviewer complains about it but over 70 others don't than I will disregard it as outlier(s).

The whole thing is opinions, though. There is no "99% of the time 50 are right". Nobody is wrong, nobody is right. It's just opinions. Opinions you may or may not agree with.

Opinion can be swayed by personal circumstances and tastes, so maybe the "outliers" just weren't in the right place when they played it; but regardless of that it's still their opinion.

The EG guy says that human encounters in main missions were numerous and tedious while many others didn't complain about that – perhaps this critic had less time to play so mainlined the central quest and got fatigue, while other critics had more time to free-roam or sidequest? Perhaps he encountered more dull AI routines by chance?

Who knows, but there's no way we can call it invalid.

Anyway, we should really get some early impression folk in here to chime in :)

PS i'm not a big fan of EG or USG or anything, I don't really care for reviews. I worked as a journalist/reviewer once and after seeing what it's like I decided I'd rather make my own mind up and do things for my own enjoyment.
 
The whole thing is opinions, though. There is no "99% of the time 50 are right". Nobody is wrong, nobody is right. It's just opinions. Opinions you may or may not agree with.

Opinion can be swayed by personal circumstances and tastes, so maybe the "outliers" just weren't in the right place when they played it; but regardless of that it's still their opinion.

The EG guy says that human encounters in main missions were numerous and tedious while many others didn't complain about that – perhaps this critic had less time to play so mainlined the central quest and got fatigue, while other critics had more time to free-roam or sidequest? Perhaps he encountered more dull AI routines by chance?

Who knows, but there's no way we can call it invalid.

Anyway, we should really get some early impression folk in here to chime in :)

Obviously, and I stated my opinion on theirs. Nothing more or less.
 

kraspkibble

Permabanned.
i'm super excited for this game now but it clashes with zelda. two amazing games i'm looking forward to but not enough time for both :(
 
I love how the hacked robot also helped with the battle. And was that another robot that joined the battle near the end of the video?

Yes that's when I panicked, when I saw a pack of scavengers randomly join the fight and i notice all the NPCs were dead. That was all unplanned, unscripted, the next time I loaded the save I prepared and was able to take them all down.

On what difficulty was this?

Very hard. If that tail that somehow went right over my head hit me it would be instant death.

Oh and yes on regular PS4. This game is a technical marvel.

One other thing to note, I cut the video to start to soon, if you notice the second it starts and the bull is rushing, he's not rushing at me. There is an NPC dude crouching in the grass and he set up a bunch of traps and that's what brings the bull down.
 
Ok, for those that have the game and played it, I have some questions

1)I heard that the main missions, for the most part, have humans as enemies and knowing that human AI is pretty mad or mediocre at best, it kind of disappoints me.

2)Although the big machines are a treat to fight, the smaller ones are not so smart and you can easily cheese them by killing a dozen of them just of them just by hiding in the grass and not actually fighting them, which reminds me of AC of course, but I would have wanted this to be the case for only the humans in this game, not for the machines too.

3)Did someone find any Killzone references or easter eggs anywhere :p?Just say yes or no
and spoiler tag it please

1. Not really, or it's a mix.

2. Maybe two types but trust me they are insignificant compared to majority of the game.

3.
Yes...
 

Luq

Member
Good game, but brings nothing new to the table. Played it for around 30 hours, loved graphics, long range fights, traps, stealth and 2nd half of the story. Hated melee combat, boring dialogues, kinda repetetive side activities and the fact that cities feel "dead". There are tons of characters but they just looks like a classic filler. Plus you can't even push them - they just stand there like a wall, barely reacting to anything you do. It annoys the shit out of me even though I know it's not a big issue.
 

jayu26

Member
The whole thing is opinions, though. There is no "99% of the time 50 are right". Nobody is wrong, nobody is right. It's just opinions. Opinions you may or may not agree with.

Opinion can be swayed by personal circumstances and tastes, so maybe the "outliers" just weren't in the right place when they played it; but regardless of that it's still their opinion.

The EG guy says that human encounters in main missions were numerous and tedious while many others didn't complain about that – perhaps this critic had less time to play so mainlined the central quest and got fatigue, while other critics had more time to free-roam or sidequest? Perhaps he encountered more dull AI routines by chance?

Who knows, but there's no way we can call it invalid.

Anyway, we should really get some early impression folk in here to chime in :)

PS i'm not a big fan of EG or USG or anything, I don't really care for reviews. I worked as a journalist/reviewer once and after seeing what it's like I decided I'd rather make my own mind up and do things for my own enjoyment.
Did read what I wrote? Did I say their review is invalid? I merely said that they can write the review that they think is correct and I will exercise my right to judge it's content by comparing it to others. And in this case concluding that fighting mainly human AI in the main missions is not an issue. That is my conclusion.
 
Good game, but brings nothing new to the table. Played it for around 30 hours, loved graphics, long range fights, traps, stealth and 2nd half of the story. Hated melee combat, boring dialogues, kinda repetetive side activities and the fact that cities feel "dead". There are tons of characters but they just looks like a classic filler. Plus you can't even push them - they just stand there like a wall, barely reacting to anything you do. It annoys the shit out of me even though I know it's not a big issue.

image.php
 

Gurish

Member
Oh and yes on regular PS4. This game is a technical marvel.

Bu...but but.. but how?! how a game can look so good on such an ancient hardware?

those screens you posted look like bullshots, how did they achieve such an IQ and visuals on OG PS4??

It's black magic.
 
Just beat my first thunderjaw. That was like a fucking boss fight in any other game. Tried about 20 times before I could do it. Truly insane how intense it was. The sense of accomplishment when it went down is sooo good. And when it did, all that creeamy creamm EXP.

Also fought
stormbird + behemoth
. So so so so good. Both took a few tries to take down but man, this game...

And that's just creatures you can find on the maps. Flatmate came home when I ran into the
behemoth
and he sat down and watched me fight it and he was like "this game is fucking crazy."




Anyone went to the far top right?
I wandered all the way up there and there's a map icon and the area is protected by robots but seemingly, there's nothing I can do here?!!
 
Good game, but brings nothing new to the table. Played it for around 30 hours, loved graphics, long range fights, traps, stealth and 2nd half of the story. Hated melee combat, boring dialogues, kinda repetetive side activities and the fact that cities feel "dead". There are tons of characters but they just looks like a classic filler. Plus you can't even push them - they just stand there like a wall, barely reacting to anything you do. It annoys the shit out of me even though I know it's not a big issue.

This can be said about everything, pretty much hard to take you serious anytime somone says this.
 

SomTervo

Member
Did read what I wrote? Did I say their review is invalid? I merely said that they can write the review that they think is correct and I will exercise my right to judge it's content by comparing it to others. And in this case concluding that fighting mainly human AI in the main missions is not an issue. That is my conclusion.

Sorry, the 'invalid' line was re onemanasylum's post (where he implicated it was invalid) and I just copied your post in as the sentiment mostly overlapped. Should have delineated the responses.
 
Top Bottom