• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

New Dunkirk trailer

Occam

Member
So this isn't based on reality? If I remember my history correctly, Hitler basically allowed them to get away, because he didn't want to risk his tanks and because he still thought he might be able to make peace with Great Britain (which was idiotic, of course).
 
Plus it's in a packed month with Spider Man, Planet of the Apes, Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets, Atomic Blonde, and The Emoji Movie. I think Dunkirk might bomb in America.

Out of the 5 movies you listed at least 3 of them have the potential to perform really poorly. I agree that Dunkirk could disappoint at the box office though. I'm not sure what qualifies a movie as a bomb but I'm not sure it will be that much of a failure.
 
Out of the 5 movies you listed at least 3 of them have the potential to perform really poorly. I agree that Dunkirk could disappoint at the box office though. I'm not sure what qualifies a movie as a bomb but I'm not sure it will be that much of a failure.

I mean I think Valerian is going to bomb here too, but I think it's got more appeal to the younger demographic and women than Dunkirk does and they both open at the same time. I don't think Dunkirk brings a lot of the older generation either due to lack of interest in a battle most Americans probably are unaware of, and more importantly it doesn't involve us. LOL

I'm certain Dunkirk's budget is massive because Nolan's salary alone was 20 million.
 

Staccat0

Fail out bailed
What a fucking terrible trailer.

Movie looks great, but that thing is cut like a trailer for Batman or something and it creates a dissonance with the character drama being depicted in the scenes.
 
This looks pretty damn good.

Honestly, there were more than a few shots in this that reminded me of the last half of Titanic.

Except with, you know... WWII dogfighting happening at the same time.

I'm real curious if this isn't the wartime drama punctuated with bits of startling action, but is in fact a straight up fucking action movie.

The 5 minute sequence that they showed in cinemas was straight up action with barely any dialogue, and he has said he's going for a more focused visual approach rather than lots of exposition like in his other movies. I'd love if this became the Fury Road of WW2 movies.
 
Still don't get a hook for this movie. It's going to be Nolan's lowest opening/grossing movie yet.

I'm fine with that but hope the movie is good.

Should have just released something similar to the IMAX preview but in trailer length/2.5 minutes

That clip they showed in front of rogue one was incredibly tense
 
Looks alright but after Inception, TDKR, and Interstellar I'm a bit worried. I'm not sure I can pin it down exactly but Nolan movies as of late have felt bloated and self indulgent. I hope this movie brings back the Nolan that directed The Prestige and The Dark Knight.
 

Brazil

Living in the shadow of Amaz
I'll be there day 1 because it's Nolan, but I can't say I'm feeling the film's draw.

I'd shrug it off if it wasn't a Nolan flick based on these trailers.
 
Hm, I think the movie could be good but that trailer was cut pretty badly. It was like they were trying to fit the movie into the trailer's tone rather than the other way around. Wasn't natural.
 

Icolin

Banned
Better than the previous trailer(s?), at least. Always in for anything Nolan, but I wasn't really excited about this until the GAF impressions of the IMAX Rogue One prologue thing came out, with people saying that it's more of a high tension thriller than what it seemed like from the trailers. Sounds awesome to me.
 
We got a spot of bother across the channel old boy. Turns out the gerries are on their way and our boys don't have any boats to get them out of that pickle in time.

Aw well what we can do guvnor, is the locals in the towns can put up their boats in some jolly cooperation to help those brave warriors old chap.

jolly good idea, and it can also be a theme of unity and coming together for the shit munchers to chomp on, rather poignant during these dark times of political division.

oh, genius old chap.
 

UrbanRats

Member
I don't know man, looks good to me.
It's not clear who the protagonist or the important characters even are, tho.

You can say it's like Mad Max Fury Road, action top to bottom, but Mad Max had a very simple frame work and characters to have that work well.
 
Looks solid. I'm sure the battle sequences will be spectacular, the trailer was apparently all over the place though, I'll admit, although that's probably just a case of the film being of a more of an ensembled piece then anything.
 
Some more controversial and argued than others, but among other things Lord Gort's one sided (and possibly before getting such orders- technically making it akin to desertion) decision to retreat to Dunkirk with BEF troops without informing his Belgian and French allies who would then unwittingly provide cover for the retreat?

I mean... Surely you do not fully buy the whole "Dunkirk Miracle was really a victory" war propaganda thing, right?

I guess I can see how Gort's retreat to Dunkirk can be controversial from a French or Belgian view but it was necessary to save the BEF from total destruction.

The Dunkirk evacuation made a crushing defeat slightly less crushing but it did provide a moral boost and possible saved Churchill from being removed as PM and replaced with someone who preferred peace to fighting.
 

pringles

Member
Unbelievable trailer. 100% sold me on the movie after previously feeling like it was a waste of time for a director like Nolan. Looks like it could be a masterpiece.
 
I liked the first trailer a lot better tbh

Also makes me sad that Nolan uses Interstellar as his claim to fame now instead of The Prestige, Memento or even Inception. Oh well.
 
Plus it's in a packed month with Spider Man, Planet of the Apes, Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets, Atomic Blonde, and The Emoji Movie. I think Dunkirk might bomb in America.
I think you're delusional putting all of those movies except Spiderman before a new Nolan movie lol
 

Daft_Cat

Member
I don't know man, looks good to me.
It's not clear who the protagonist or the important characters even are, tho.

You can say it's like Mad Max Fury Road, action top to bottom, but Mad Max had a very simple frame work and characters to have that work well.

Hm. Fury Road had 3 central characters representing different "groups" or backgrounds, so to speak. Max, the loner, Furiosa, the slave and Nux, the turncoat. They begin their respective journeys separately until their paths intersect in one giant, feature-length conflict.

Likewise, in Dunkirk, you have the pilot played by Hardy, the civilian sailor, played by Rylance, and the stranded soldier, played by Fionn Whitehead. Each seems to be caught up in their own stories, surrounded by their own little group of supporting characters. I suppose the vignette-structure does separate it a bit from Fury Road in terms of shape (assuming paths never cross), though it does maintain that sense of one huge, extended action sequence.

...Only in this case, it's the evacuation of Dunkirk, rather than a chase through the desert. In any case, sign me up.
 
I think you're delusional putting all of those movies except Spiderman before a new Nolan movie lol

It has nothing to do with Nolan, and everything with the genre and subject of the film and the time it's going to be released. My point with the other films is showing the demographics they're going to capture away from this film.
 
I liked the first trailer a lot better tbh

Also makes me sad that Nolan uses Interstellar as his claim to fame now instead of The Prestige, Memento or even Inception. Oh well.

Some TV spots have mentioned Inception in place of Interstellar, and then I wanna say the teaser last year with Suicide Squad mentioned all three.

Basically, they're all over the place.
 

EGM1966

Member
I suspect in hindsight the marketing is going to look very good for the film.

It's clearly aimed squarely not at depicting the film in the traditional way but educating a market that probably has no idea of what Dunkirk is in context as well as carefully targeting a couple of elements of the film in a very direct way.

Going right back to the first teaser you can see a natural progression to this trailer.

The core concept of lives in peril (and of a moment of terrific import that could alter outcome of a war) is conveyed.

The core concept of a race against time to avoid failure is conveyed.

The core elements of men stranded waiting, of a desperate rag tag of boats coming to their rescue, and of a combat filled finale is conveyed.

The use of imagery cut to the music is very compelling and simple to understand. There's no deep, compels drama implied, merely the simple fact of a life or death situation.

Given this film is a hard sell (we're surely talking a big budget from what's been seen so far and a moment in history that's probably vague to many now and what looks like a lack of traditional drama such as the fictional love/human dramas normally injected into such films) I'd argue this makes sense as the way to go.

In the cinema the impact of the trailers is particularly strong too (the extended segment shown had more people talking afterwards than the main film when I saw it for example) and this enforces the Ida of something you need to see on the biggest screen possible.

Unless it just doesn't hold together I think the film will do surprisingly well.
 

Elandyll

Banned
The fact that you think this is Toryism is a perfect embodiment of the mindset that will ensure the Tories keep winning.
Depends how the film treats known events and is willing to challenge the UK-school induced reverence to the "miracle of Dunkirk" imo.

There is I think space for both an inspirational tale of events that resulted in inflated morale after a crushing defeat, events possibly contributing to the eventual success of the Allies in 1944, alongside a well measured critique of the "myth" part.
 
I mean I think Valerian is going to bomb here too, but I think it's got more appeal to the younger demographic and women than Dunkirk does and they both open at the same time. I don't think Dunkirk brings a lot of the older generation either due to lack of interest in a battle most Americans probably are unaware of, and more importantly it doesn't involve us. LOL

I'm certain Dunkirk's budget is massive because Nolan's salary alone was 20 million.

Harry Styles is in it, the tweenies will turn out for it en masse.

Edit, beaten to mention Harry Styles like a Labour councillor at the local elections today.
 

4Tran

Member
Depends how the film treats known events and is willing to challenge the UK-school induced reverence to the "miracle of Dunkirk" imo.

There is I think space for both an inspirational tale of events that resulted in inflated morale after a crushing defeat, events possibly contributing to the eventual success of the Allies in 1944, alongside a well measured critique of the "myth" part.
The lack of any French and the vocal overlay of Churchill's "We Shall Fight on the Beaches" speech tells me that this is going to unfiltered "Miracle of Dunkirk". It's sad really because there's a fine film that can be made about the real thing.
 
Definitely the best trailer they've released. My dad's a big fan of the 1958 film. It'll be interesting to see what he thinks of this in comparison.
 

jstevenson

Sailor Stevenson
it's amazing how this movie looked like it was in high-def in the IMAX screening I saw last night compared to everything else.

More large format film movies dammit!
 
Top Bottom