chameleonboy
Banned
Are you seriously victim blaming in this thread?
Looks like he might be a victim too if he was too drunk to consent
Are you seriously victim blaming in this thread?
I never understood how blacking out and memory loss worked when drunk.
I've been drunk plenty of times to the point of passing out and up to the point of passing out I remember everything, regardless of whether I actually had actual control of myself or not. So I never understood how people can be functional but just happen to have gaps in their memory.
From her statements I dont think it is. She pretty much said 'I dont blame him, we were both drunk. I already have a boyfriend.'I do think there's a level of drunkenness where consent can be given but this is pretty cut and dry rape.
Depends on if the part of her being completely unconcious is accurate, imo. It's one reason I think all these people who go out getting hammered and having drunken sex are morons.Looks like he might be a victim too if he was too drunk to consent
Looks like he might be a victim too if he was too drunk to consent
You can't consent while drunk. Period.
How does blacking out work in a case like this
what if you consent while blacked out
I've seen people be fully functional blacked out, but they don't remember anything the next day
Looks like he might be a victim too if he was too drunk to consent
imo, if one person is unconcious it's rape 100% of the time. If she doesn't care, then there's nothing that can be done about it I guess. Though it also makes you wonder if he's victimized anyone else in this way.From her statements I dont think it is. She pretty much said 'I dont blame him, we were both drunk. I already have a boyfriend.'
Whats to say that he wasn't capable of consenting!
hm? hmmmmmm?
Didn't include this since the source is the daily mail
Since being drunk means you cannot provide consent what happens when both parties are intoxicated? Some of the posters will twist this, but why is he immediately labeled the monster, slimeball, rapist, etc?
We don't know who initiated said activity, it appears both of them reciprocated sexually. All we know is that two young and attractive people had inappropriate drunken sex. Other cast mates have provided contradicting report that provide argument for either side. We also know that the two remain cordial and are on speaking terms post incident, with the victim only really blaming the film crew.
I don't think it is as black and white as some want to make it and I certainly wouldn't admonish just the male in this situation and/or get my pitchfork out just yet.
At the point where he's moving her limp body like a fucking sex doll, we can probably say he was consenting...
In the US, the law varies from state to state, but it typically describes "too drunk to give consent" as incapacitated by alcohol. That phrase also has a bunch of interpretations, but if the daily mail blurb is accurate, that would be a prime example. Regardless, it doesn't appear that he was incapacitated by alcohol during that time and she may have been.
Since being drunk means you cannot provide consent what happens when both parties are intoxicated? Some of the posters will twist this, but why is he immediately labeled the monster, slimeball, rapist, etc?
We don't know who initiated said activity, it appears both of them reciprocated sexually. All we know is that two young and attractive people had inappropriate drunken sex. Other cast mates have provided contradicting report that provide argument for either side. We also know that the two remain cordial and are on speaking terms post incident, with the "victim" only really blaming the film crew.
I don't think it is as black and white as some want to make it and I certainly wouldn't admonish just the male in this situation and/or get my pitchfork out just yet.
Since being drunk means you cannot provide consent what happens when both parties are intoxicated? Some of the posters will twist this, but why is he immediately labeled the monster, slimeball, rapist, etc?
We don't know who initiated said activity, it appears both of them reciprocated sexually. All we know is that two young and attractive people had inappropriate drunken sex. Other cast mates have provided contradicting report that provide argument for either side. We also know that the two remain cordial and are on speaking terms post incident, with the "victim" only really blaming the film crew.
I don't think it is as black and white as some want to make it and I certainly wouldn't admonish just the male in this situation and/or get my pitchfork out just yet.
this happened in Mexico
How does blacking out work in a case like this
what if you consent while blacked out
I've seen people be fully functional blacked out, but they don't remember anything the next day
The situation described in the OP is pretty cut and dry though that she was passed the fuck out and he went from there which is super fucking gross.
Which is why I'm waiting to find out what accounts are actually true before judging the situation rather than relying on hearsay to condemn someone
I will wait for more facts about this. However, if the account about him hefting her limp, unconscious body out of the hot tub and splaying her out on the ground to perform oral sex are accurate, then I am reluctant to think of him as a victim. To put it mildly.
At the point where he's moving her limp body like a fucking sex doll, we can probably say he was consenting...
So you saw the tapes? Tell me more.
And there is a disputing claim that she was shoving her genitals in his face. So we don't know exactly what happened, until someone that sees the videos says.
If that daily mail article is to be believed both are apparently on speaking terms, and she mostly blames the show producers.
So right now this seems like a very complicated situation, and both parties could actually be victims. We won't know until more facts are known about the video of the incident.
what is the legal standard of consent with regards to alcohol?
i know it varies by locality.
different people react differently to alcohol
i've know people that you'd not think are drunk but literally can't remember anything
So you saw the tapes? Tell me more.
Although 99% of the time I roll my eyes at "we don't know all the facts" replies, in this case I agree 100%.
Despite what people like to say to make themselves feel like they are better than everyone else shit is hard when both people in a sexual situation are drunk as shit.
Early in college I woke up with a girl and a used condom. Neither of us remembered even leaving the party we were at. Luckily we both realized we were both way too drunk and even though we clearly had sex neither of us felt like the other did something wrong. I've posted this story before and been called a rapist for it. How sober does the other person need to be for it to be sexual assault? What if one person is really drunk, and the other is blackout drunk but seems to be fine?
I basically instated a "we both have to be stone cold sober the first time I have sex with someone new rule" before I met my wife just to avoid a VERY shitty situation. Hell when me and my wife used to drink alot there were times where we had sex where one of us didn't remember and the other 100% thought the other person was just regular drunk.
The situation described in the OP is pretty cut and dry though that she was passed the fuck out and he went from there which is super fucking gross.
Could you quote it?
At the point where he's moving her limp body like a fucking sex doll, we can probably say he was consenting...
The BIP crew member told the Daily Mail that the incident occurred after producers suggested Jackson and Olympios hook up. Corinne and Demario found out when they arrived in Mexico that the story line would involve the two of them hooking up so they decided to hang out and get better acquainted over drinks, the source said. Soon they decided to go swimming and when they climbed into the Jacuzzi, they were both loaded. Corinne proceeded to remove her bathing suit and things got increasingly sexual.
Nah, that's not how consent works. Doesn't matter if you want it or not - certain individuals CANNOT give consent. That goes for minors, for the intellectually impaired, and the "too drunk." If he was blackout drunk, he can't consent. That's not something you can decide on a case-by-case basis.
But I don't think that would, in theory, absolve him of responsibility. Which as I think of it is kind of an odd inconsistency... leads to a grey area where it's up to the judge I suppose.
You've probably just never been blackout drunk before. I've been blackout drunk like... twice in my life, and it had never happened until I was in my 30s which is pretty rare. On my honey moon my wife and I were drinking a fairly normal amount, like more than usua lbut nothing crazy, and then at some point in the night, I have absolutely no memory of anything. We didn't do anything unusual... Literally left the bar, went to bed, but I have no memory of cashing out, paying, going upstairs, etc., etc. It had never happened to me before and I was pretty shook from it. My wife was like "YEah, you were drunk but pretty normal."