• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

FB worker living in garage to Zuckerberg: challenges are right outside your door

moggio

Banned
The more I hear about Silicon Valley the more it sounds like a complete shit-hole.

Zuckerberg is your typical Silicon Valley bellend too.
 

Slayven

Member
Damn you would think these people are asking for solid gold maybachs and diamond grills. They just don't want to live one step above homelessness, goddamn have some empahty folks
 

Wereroku

Member
Where are you getting $72k from?

They gave us their hourly rate in the article.

Nicole earns $19.85 an hour as a shift lead, while Victor makes $17.85

Assuming they work full time they would be making 72k a year.

Damn you would think these people are asking for solid gold maybachs and diamond grills. They just don't want to live one step above homelessness, goddamn have some empahty folks

A house with 4 bedrooms in that area would probably be a multi-million dollar house so they are asking for quite a lot if they want enough wage to live in that area.
 

Briarios

Member
Nah, he just doesn't have anything to do with this. It's between the contractors and Facebook at this point.



So even Facebook is not resisting the union drive... What could Zuckerberg learn more than seeing heroin addicts and seeing other parts of the world?

That's the entitlement I'm talking about. Unionise, get a better deal and hopefully things will be better for her and her family.

You don't actually know what entitlement means, do you?
 

gun_haver

Member
Depends on where you live. You can be a king on 17 in an underdeveloped red state or the shit-tier desert parts of california. In socal or norcal, not so much.

I haven't lived in one of these expensive areas that people often talk about. I don't see how things could really be as expensive as people make out - as in, $90,000 a year being just enough to 'get by' in San Fransisco, or where ever.

I understand rent and mortage costs might be significantly higher in good areas of these cities, so let's say $2000 a month for a well-kept apartment in a safe area. So let's say $30,000 a year, just to even bump that up a bit.

Are utilities really 10x what they are in cheaper places to live? Groceries and stuff might be a little bit more expensive, but largely these kinds of things are standard across countries. I don't know how seriously to take the 'it's impossible to live on x salary in this city' stuff, but not having lived in these places, I don't really know, so I'd like to hear how this all adds up to $90,000 or there abouts being only just about a decent standard of living and not a shitload of money.

I'm not talking supporting a whole family btw, that's expensive anywhere. I just mean one person trying to keep themselves afloat.
 

Paganmoon

Member
Zuckerberg's salary is $1 per year. He is rich due to owning 20% of Facebook. Facebook is worth $480 billion.

I do hope people realize these CEO's (Musk included) take these small salaries, cause the payout the get from shares and the like are taxed much lower than the salary they'd take.
 
Oh how do I hate that... he can do both just fine. How entitled is she? He's already paying your salary.

NWOS.jpg


I know Zuck isn't a boomer. Message still applies.
 

OldRoutes

Member
Damn you would think these people are asking for solid gold maybachs and diamond grills. They just don't want to live one step above homelessness, goddamn have some empahty folks

I do have empathy, I just don't understand the solutions that people are proposing.

You'd give them both 150k a year and I don't think it'd be enough to support a family with 3 children in the Bay area.
 

RedFox85

Member
Damn, this is really crazy.. as someone who lives in MI where 20$ would be plenty to live on the thought that a 20$ an hour job is not cutting it is just mind boggling. 20$ an hour for a worker here is like.. a good paying job, easy answer is get the hell out of SF with your family but I know that's not an easy option.. you can't just pack up your enitre life so easily especially living check to check.
 
How much would that be?

I mean I don't want to sound facetious, but do you know how un-reasonnable the area has become in terms of cost of living?

I'm sure a $480B corporation can afford to pay it's service workers enough to afford a frigging apartment for a family of five in the bay area.

The necessary amount isn't the issue, because Facebook is a profit generating company, they can easily adjust these workers salaries so they don't have to live paycheck to paycheck just to scrape by.
 

Emerson

May contain jokes =>
I do have empathy, I just don't understand the solutions that people are proposing.

You'd give them both 150k a year and I don't think it'd be enough to support a family with 3 children in the Bay area.

It's not workable. Even if facebook could afford it (I'm not certain that's true), at a certain point the cost becomes so high that corporations would literally just move their entire operation to a cheaper area.
 

Ripenen

Member
They don't have to live in silicon valley, they can commute from the bay's outskirts where housing is cheaper. Sure the drive sucks but you'll actually be able to save money, pay for healthcare, not be broke, etc. wow isn't that great.

The outskirts where things are now "cheaper" are getting farther and farther out. When I lived in the bay area 15 years ago people were already commuting from Tracy into SF to work. That's 60+ miles each way, and easily two hours each way depending on time of day.
 
The issue here is just that San Francisco is expensive as fuck. Those salaries for their job are decent enough and in a normal place you could live from that. Just not in that city.

Difficult issue to fix as long as the city simply doesn't built enough houses to meet demand.
 
They gave us their hourly rate in the article.

Nicole earns $19.85 an hour as a shift lead, while Victor makes $17.85

Assuming they work full time they would be making 72k a year.



A house with 4 bedrooms in that area would probably be a multi-million dollar house so they are asking for quite a lot if they want enough wage to live in that area.

That is what 2 people making 17/hr working full time make a year.

Both the people, got it. I misread it as only referring to the one.
 

Wereroku

Member
I'm sure a $480B corporation can afford to pay it's service workers enough to afford a frigging apartment for a family of five in the bay area.

The necessary amount isn't the issue, because Facebook is a profit generating company, they can easily adjust these workers salaries so they don't have to live paycheck to paycheck just to scrape by.

A 3 bedroom apartment in that area is around 3-5k a month.
 
But even giving jobs to kids won't fix the problem of overpriced real estate. The only way to fix that would be to move the HQ out of California. Even people making six digit salaries are having problems finding housing.



Well I mean that is the argument. They don't have to live where they currently are to work there as far as the article says. They could probably find better housing if they would live away from their work. They are choosing to live so close to the headquarters should FB have to pay someone more just because they don't want to commute.

I agree, but that's not happening. They're planning an expansion of 6500 new workers.

If you're not from the area, the closest places to Facebook are East Palo Alto and east Menlo Park, which are low income areas. Every year that goes by, the areas change and you can clearly see high income people move in, but even today it's a majorly low-income community. However, even though they are low-income the rent is still ridiculous.

No one really wins here, and I agree berg's choice of HQ location is a large part of it
 

studyguy

Member
Making over $20 in my area is still just renting for life as a single person, waiting on my girlfriend to finish her nursing degree so we can probably start building towards a home. Mind you we're 30 living in Ventura County. Owning a home here for me still feels like a dream tbh.
 

slider

Member
Man, sucks for them. Kids caught up in it too. I guess they have family keeping them there. Otherwise, why stick around - with possibly limited career opportunities - when you can't afford to house yourself to a decent standard. Poor souls.
 
Where are their coworkers living? How feasible is commuting every day? What do houses cost on the outskirts? I'm all for unionizing, but at what point do you say it's time to move further out? $34 an hour between both parents is enough for a house and a car payment where I live. Maybe it's not so good further out though. For the sake of the children I do hope something gets worked out
 

OldRoutes

Member
I'm sure a $480B corporation can afford to pay it's service workers enough to afford a frigging apartment for a family of five in the bay area.

Well I'm not sure. And that's my point -- it's super sad that the little girl wants her own room in the house, and I agree that it's a terrible salary for where they are in the states..

However, Zuckerberg could probably save that family, but not the other hundreds of service workers he's currently employing.
 

carlsojo

Member
Didn't the tech companies offer to build affordable housing for their employees and the city said no or something ridiculous like that?
 
I'm sure a $480B corporation can afford to pay it's service workers enough to afford a frigging apartment for a family of five in the bay area.

The necessary amount isn't the issue, because Facebook is a profit generating company, they can easily adjust these workers salaries so they don't have to live paycheck to paycheck just to scrape by.
Im sure the company would have no trouble filling that job for the exact same salary though. So why double or triple what it currently is?

I mean it sucks, but that's the reality. I get $10 while I'm in school and it's not bad for my living situation. If I suddenly got married and had a kid I wouldn't expect them to raise my salary to $25/hr.
 

Briarios

Member
I haven't lived in one of these expensive areas that people often talk about. I don't see how things could really be as expensive as people make out - as in, $90,000 a year being just enough to 'get by' in San Fransisco, or where ever.

I understand rent and mortage costs might be significantly higher in good areas of these cities, so let's say $2000 a month for a well-kept apartment in a safe area. So let's say $30,000 a year, just to even bump that up a bit.

Are utilities really 10x what they are in cheaper places to live? Groceries and stuff might be a little bit more expensive, but largely these kinds of things are standard across countries. I don't know how seriously to take the 'it's impossible to live on x salary in this city' stuff, but not having lived in these places, I don't really know, so I'd like to hear how this all adds up to $90,000 or there abouts being only just about a decent standard of living and not a shitload of money.

I'm not talking supporting a whole family btw, that's expensive anywhere. I just mean one person trying to keep themselves afloat.

It's not hard to educate yourself about this before posting nonsense numbers.

Average price of a 2 BR apt in San Francisco is $4650 which is $55,800 a year.

Here is some more info: https://smartasset.com/mortgage/what-is-the-cost-of-living-in-san-francisco
 

Wereroku

Member
Well right now they have a 0 bedroom garage so I'm sure even one bedroom would change their lives.

A 1 bedroom 500sqft studio available right now is 1900 a month. I mean at a certain point you just have to accept you are going to have to drive if you have a family of 5. Even if they doubled their salary they would have a hard time finding a place to live in that area. Everywhere costs a fortune.
 

Enduin

No bald cap? Lies!
It's not just about wages though. There's probably a whole lot that can be done with regards to housing development, zoning, rapid public transit and so on to alleviate the housing problem in that region which is what is the major driver in cost of living. It's not simply about raising wages, though that likely is a factor.

If Zuckerberg really has any interest in public office then yeah maybe paying a bit more attention to what is effectively right outside his front door wouldn't be a bad place to start. SF and the greater Silicon Valley area is in dire need of reform as the cost of living is simply impossible for most people and only getting worse. They need a solution to this housing and cost of living crisis.
 

Gallbaro

Banned
It's not just about wages though. There's probably a whole lot that can be done with regards to housing development, zoning, rapid public transit and so on to alleviate the housing problem in that region which is what is the major driver in cost of living. It's not simply about raising wages, though that likely is a factor.

If Zuckerberg really has any interest in public office then yeah maybe paying a bit more attention to what is effectively right outside his front door wouldn't be a bad place to start. SF and the greater Silicon Valley area is in dire need of reform as the cost of living is simply impossible for most people and only getting worse. They need a solution to this housing and cost of living crisis.
But think of the landowners!

You want them to loose wealth or go under water on their mortgages?!
 

Wereroku

Member
Racist Californians do not want to build housing for poor people in the little townships. New housing will run the neighborhood's character and landowner's wealth.

See this dumbass for an exact cause in Palto Alto.

https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2016/07/15/lydia-kou-announces-bid-for-city-council

God I hate nimby's. The best way to fix this would be building more housing but that is always blocked by some shitty group. Housing prices will just continue to rise unless some of these silicon valley hq's more to lower cost areas or they are allowed to build more dense housing complexes.
 

numble

Member
I do hope people realize these CEO's (Musk included) take these small salaries, cause the payout the get from shares and the like are taxed much lower than the salary they'd take.
They can take a high salary plus stock options if they wanted to. For Musk and Zuckerberg, I don't think it is the case (like in some situations) where they negotiated a CEO contract by manipulating the category of remuneration. Besides, both Musk and Zuckerberg's companies have faced bad times on the market where a firm compensation would have been better financially.
 
Racist Californians do not want to build housing for poor people in the little townships. New housing will run the neighborhood's character and landowner's wealth.

Facebook, Google, etc. Would love to build more housing in the areas.

See this dumbass for an exact cause in Palto Alto.

https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2016/07/15/lydia-kou-announces-bid-for-city-council

went to her twitter and her first post is a self proclaimed NIMBY post

https://twitter.com/lydia_kou

This. I can't afford to live in midtown Manhattan. Gotta commute.

Facebook is in the suburbs. Where are you getting your information from?
 
They gave us their hourly rate in the article.

Nicole earns $19.85 an hour as a shift lead, while Victor makes $17.85

Assuming they work full time they would be making 72k a year.
.

You forget they have to pay taxes and Obamacare, so from that 72000 they get to spend much less
 
Damn you would think these people are asking for solid gold maybachs and diamond grills. They just don't want to live one step above homelessness, goddamn have some empahty folks

That is asking way to much for some people empathy is just way to hard their are way to many people who believe in the bs bootstrap mentality that certain people have been using as propaganda.


As for the people in the article themselves they are basically stuck where they are in their jobs because they cannot afford to change jobs or move. So any person who says to these people to just move and commute to work tell me how they they can feasibly do that when they can barely afford food and clothes?
 
Top Bottom