Where are you getting $72k from?
Damn you would think these people are asking for solid gold maybachs and diamond grills. They just don't want to live one step above homelessness, goddamn have some empahty folks
Where are you getting $72k from?
Nah, he just doesn't have anything to do with this. It's between the contractors and Facebook at this point.
So even Facebook is not resisting the union drive... What could Zuckerberg learn more than seeing heroin addicts and seeing other parts of the world?
That's the entitlement I'm talking about. Unionise, get a better deal and hopefully things will be better for her and her family.
Depends on where you live. You can be a king on 17 in an underdeveloped red state or the shit-tier desert parts of california. In socal or norcal, not so much.
Zuckerberg's salary is $1 per year. He is rich due to owning 20% of Facebook. Facebook is worth $480 billion.
Oh how do I hate that... he can do both just fine. How entitled is she? He's already paying your salary.
Damn you would think these people are asking for solid gold maybachs and diamond grills. They just don't want to live one step above homelessness, goddamn have some empahty folks
How much would that be?
I mean I don't want to sound facetious, but do you know how un-reasonnable the area has become in terms of cost of living?
Strongly disagree. That's more than most people I know make.
I do have empathy, I just don't understand the solutions that people are proposing.
You'd give them both 150k a year and I don't think it'd be enough to support a family with 3 children in the Bay area.
They don't have to live in silicon valley, they can commute from the bay's outskirts where housing is cheaper. Sure the drive sucks but you'll actually be able to save money, pay for healthcare, not be broke, etc. wow isn't that great.
They gave us their hourly rate in the article.
Nicole earns $19.85 an hour as a shift lead, while Victor makes $17.85
Assuming they work full time they would be making 72k a year.
A house with 4 bedrooms in that area would probably be a multi-million dollar house so they are asking for quite a lot if they want enough wage to live in that area.
That is what 2 people making 17/hr working full time make a year.
In Kansas maybe.
I'm sure a $480B corporation can afford to pay it's service workers enough to afford a frigging apartment for a family of five in the bay area.
The necessary amount isn't the issue, because Facebook is a profit generating company, they can easily adjust these workers salaries so they don't have to live paycheck to paycheck just to scrape by.
But even giving jobs to kids won't fix the problem of overpriced real estate. The only way to fix that would be to move the HQ out of California. Even people making six digit salaries are having problems finding housing.
Well I mean that is the argument. They don't have to live where they currently are to work there as far as the article says. They could probably find better housing if they would live away from their work. They are choosing to live so close to the headquarters should FB have to pay someone more just because they don't want to commute.
A 3 bedroom apartment in that area is around 3-5k a month.
Huh. And here I thought I've lived in OC my whole life.
I'm sure a $480B corporation can afford to pay it's service workers enough to afford a frigging apartment for a family of five in the bay area.
I wasn't aware that Paul Ryan was on gaf.Oh how do I hate that... he can do both just fine. How entitled is she? He's already paying your salary.
Are all people you know baristas?
17 dollars an hour is not a salary. Shit is too low to live on with a family. Regardless if both parents make it.
No. Just ordinary, working class people. Crazy, I know.
Im sure the company would have no trouble filling that job for the exact same salary though. So why double or triple what it currently is?I'm sure a $480B corporation can afford to pay it's service workers enough to afford a frigging apartment for a family of five in the bay area.
The necessary amount isn't the issue, because Facebook is a profit generating company, they can easily adjust these workers salaries so they don't have to live paycheck to paycheck just to scrape by.
I haven't lived in one of these expensive areas that people often talk about. I don't see how things could really be as expensive as people make out - as in, $90,000 a year being just enough to 'get by' in San Fransisco, or where ever.
I understand rent and mortage costs might be significantly higher in good areas of these cities, so let's say $2000 a month for a well-kept apartment in a safe area. So let's say $30,000 a year, just to even bump that up a bit.
Are utilities really 10x what they are in cheaper places to live? Groceries and stuff might be a little bit more expensive, but largely these kinds of things are standard across countries. I don't know how seriously to take the 'it's impossible to live on x salary in this city' stuff, but not having lived in these places, I don't really know, so I'd like to hear how this all adds up to $90,000 or there abouts being only just about a decent standard of living and not a shitload of money.
I'm not talking supporting a whole family btw, that's expensive anywhere. I just mean one person trying to keep themselves afloat.
Well right now they have a 0 bedroom garage so I'm sure even one bedroom would change their lives.
That is what 2 people making 17/hr working full time make a year.
Living on less than $17 an hour in OC?
Yes? Do you think everyone is some kind of executive or in the tech industry in OC?
But think of the landowners!It's not just about wages though. There's probably a whole lot that can be done with regards to housing development, zoning, rapid public transit and so on to alleviate the housing problem in that region which is what is the major driver in cost of living. It's not simply about raising wages, though that likely is a factor.
If Zuckerberg really has any interest in public office then yeah maybe paying a bit more attention to what is effectively right outside his front door wouldn't be a bad place to start. SF and the greater Silicon Valley area is in dire need of reform as the cost of living is simply impossible for most people and only getting worse. They need a solution to this housing and cost of living crisis.
Racist Californians do not want to build housing for poor people in the little townships. New housing will run the neighborhood's character and landowner's wealth.
See this dumbass for an exact cause in Palto Alto.
https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2016/07/15/lydia-kou-announces-bid-for-city-council
They can take a high salary plus stock options if they wanted to. For Musk and Zuckerberg, I don't think it is the case (like in some situations) where they negotiated a CEO contract by manipulating the category of remuneration. Besides, both Musk and Zuckerberg's companies have faced bad times on the market where a firm compensation would have been better financially.I do hope people realize these CEO's (Musk included) take these small salaries, cause the payout the get from shares and the like are taxed much lower than the salary they'd take.
Move to the suburbs and commute to work. There problem solved
Racist Californians do not want to build housing for poor people in the little townships. New housing will run the neighborhood's character and landowner's wealth.
Facebook, Google, etc. Would love to build more housing in the areas.
See this dumbass for an exact cause in Palto Alto.
https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2016/07/15/lydia-kou-announces-bid-for-city-council
This. I can't afford to live in midtown Manhattan. Gotta commute.
They gave us their hourly rate in the article.
Nicole earns $19.85 an hour as a shift lead, while Victor makes $17.85
Assuming they work full time they would be making 72k a year.
.
Damn you would think these people are asking for solid gold maybachs and diamond grills. They just don't want to live one step above homelessness, goddamn have some empahty folks