• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Gran Turismo Sport - Review Thread

TechnicPuppet

Nothing! I said nothing!
7.5ish is a good score. Reviewers seem to be falling for less hype these days on most games so review scores are lower for everything.
 

farisr

Member
I love it when people have to end their statement with 'I'm a fan of this series from the start'. Because maybe it adds validity to their opinion or they have an entitlement of expectation.
I replied to a guy who was judging the game without ever trying the game himself. Saying the online aspect wasn't for him etc. I suggested it's better he tries the game himself as he might like it. One can try the game at a store or at a friend's because ultimately your the one who can decide if your gonna enjoy it or not. I don't know why you got involved for?
I love it when lame attempts at discrediting someone's posts are so transparent, it really requires zero effort on my part at all to show

I also love it when people lose an argument they're having and then try to go back to the beginning of it and try to shed their original post that got an appropriate reply in a different light in an attempt to discredit the argument that took place after that point:. Also, I call out ridiculous shit when I see it, and your post was ridiculous. That's why I got involved.
Yeah it still fucking amazes me how people will chat any shit just because they read a review. When they can infact Try The Game out themselves and see if they enjoy/like it. Why let the opinion of somebody else affect your decision? They aren't going to be playing for you.
Then you have the other crazies putting the game down because of online focus and no single player and less cars etc etc. Just try the gamem. You might just like it. We weren't all born playing COD or FIFA online were we???
This is far from a "simple suggestion" and I replied with the fact that there isn't a demo to try at this point in time and not everyone was able to try out a beta and so on and so on. So maybe, you should be reading over your previous posts every time you make a new one, since you seem to forget pretty quickly as to what the conversation is even about and how it started. You forgot your initial post, and you forgot when you brought up the competition first already. I wonder what else you're going to forget now. Actually never mind. I'm pretty much done here and have to go anyways. And the review thread would be better if this silliness just stopped here.
 

John Wick

Member
This explains a lot, you seem to write and forget what you wrote right after.This is the post that first mentions a "certain series", I only start referring to it in reply and after this post. So yes, you are the one who brought it up first.

Okay and... does that stop the game from getting criticized for having a low car count when there is competition and previous games to compare to? No it doesn't.That's nice, and how long is this going to take, when is the first pack going to release? Is it going to be free? Also, while I obviously believe more cars and tracks will be coming, Kaz stating something does not make it true. He stated that this game would be an 85% offline experience. Clearly not true. He also said there were no features cut from past GT games. That is also clearly not true.

I replied to someone else (Kenziedielocke). He bought it up. You jumped into that conversation when we were already in conversation. So between me and you no I didn't bring it up.
I never said anything about criticism. Regarding Content and features your best forwarding those questions to PD. I said judging by their statements and previous support expect more content and features in the future
 

CrayToes

Member
Good comparison. I strongly believe that the (presumably) sublime online part of the game will give this game really , really strong legs.


It's up to polyphony to properly support the game now. Bugs and glitches need to be addressed rapidly while they also have to keep up a steady flow of content (events, tournaments, cars, tracks and so on).
Yeah, I played a few Sport events last night where people were going out of their way to avoid hitting other cars and thought to myself PD could be on to something really special here so long as they handle it properly. Could be a game changer for racing sims on console.
 

John Wick

Member
So you're saying people aren't allowed to be disappointed when a franchise they liked shifts focus massively?

Shifts focus massively?
GT6 was about racing? Did it have online racing?
GT Sport is about racing? It has online racing?
I fail to see the massive shift in focus.
 

BearPawB

Banned
This thread has gotten really defensive really fast.

It’s ok to be critical of things in this game. It is very clearly NOT a game that is trying to be for everyone.

If you are the type of person who loves time trials, loves perfecting your laps, setting good qualifying times. Then you will obviously love this game.

But you have to also understand that’s a much more narrow niche than GT usually fills.

The game is not perfect. The track list is small for a modern racing game, the car list is small, and has a lot of very similar models (several mustangs, several wrx. The always online stuff is going to turn people off.

And even then, for the mega gear heads, the upgrades also aren’t as deep as the competition.

This isn’t a “driving” game, it is a “racing” game. And if you don’t understand/care about the SPORT of racing, then i totally understand not liking the game much at all, because it doesn’t offer anything beyond that
 

farisr

Member
Shifts focus massively?
GT6 was about racing? Did it have online racing?
GT Sport is about racing? It has online racing?
I fail to see the massive shift in focus.
Okay now I know you're trolling, and I really feel bad about wasting so much time on you. This shit is hysterical.
 
Shifts focus massively?
GT6 was about racing? Did it have online racing?
GT Sport is about racing? It has online racing?
I fail to see the massive shift in focus.

The shift from being a CarPG with a full set of championships to being an online centered esports title?

There are different facets to racing, you know. Would you say Mario Kart and GT have the same focus just because they're both racing games?

It's ok to be critical of things in this game. [...] that's a much more narrow niche than GT usually fills. [...] then i totally understand not liking the game much at all

Get out of here with that level headedness :p
 

Arklite

Member
Hopefully these reviews are a wake up call to Polyphony and Sony to make some real changes to this series.

This is a real change for the franchise, it has dropped all of its past structure for a new one. Apparently it won't knock it out of the park for critics with Sport, but this is a new beginning for GT going forward.
 

Chobel

Member
Shifts focus massively?
GT6 was about racing? Did it have online racing?
GT Sport is about racing? It has online racing?
I fail to see the massive shift in focus.

C'mon you're not even trying anymore, I doubt even you believe the BS you wrote above lol.
 

Synth

Member
I replied to a guy who was judging the game without ever trying the game himself. Saying the online aspect wasn't for him etc. I suggested it's better he tries the game himself as he might like it. One can try the game at a store or at a friend's because ultimately your the one who can decide if your gonna enjoy it or not. I don't know why you got involved for?
I replied to someone else (Kenziedielocke). He bought it up.

Hold up... Kenziedielocke is free to jump in here to clarify, but why are you so certain he didn't try the beta/demo? He posted in the demo thread:

Yep, I got my full 200Mbit/s and I only usually get half at its peak.

It's also not the only time in this thread you've simply dismissed someone's criticism with "you should have tried the demo" (ignoring any potential reasons they may not have been able to). You posted earlier to JackAubrey:

Maybe you should have played the demo??? It certainly isn't a crap game. Sheesh people need to stop with this shit

...who also has multiple posts in the GTS demo thread, with his impressions of the game.

Maybe stop assuming any criticism on the game comes exclusively from people that haven't tried it?
 

thelastword

Banned
4 stars is fair. I dont know why you guys are so annoyed by it.

There's nothing wrong with the score, generally I have no problems with any score, but if he felt the game was that good already, perhaps if he played it a bit more .."the way it was meant to be played" and spent enough time with it's main features, he would have liked it even more.

It's crazy too because I feel there's a lot that the game offers in terms of features and content that's not being mentioned.....

Why I am not hearing much more about;


1.) Splitscreen Racing in 2017 as a feature and it's actually done the right way too


2.) Super fast saves, proper leaderboards and pretty much every activity you do in the game is recorded and logged to a kinda profile rpg in the background, where you get rewards and achieve milestones etc..

.
3.) The best photo mode in any game, Scapes is meaty and full of locales and content and everything is tied to social media to post photos etc..


4.) I remember a time when the livery editor was all the rage because GT didn't have one, now it has the best one, where you can use SVG downloads/uploads, where is all the talk about it...


5.) Why aren't we talking more about the more challenging events and races, the better sound, the better A.I. the solid 60fps. The graphical flourishes not seen in other racers.


6.) Why aren't we talking more about the genius structure of the online racing, the vision behind it, you need to learn proper etiquette before you can race online. SR is a genius feature and ensures people get into the right mode for proper play. If you just want to drive in reverse or pummel people to the wall, that's fine, but there's redress. Why aren't they talking about the 20 + 40 minute spaces between races, I think that's genius too. You get enough time to get some laps on the track to get familiar and you can also register for multiple races at a time, so when your 20 is done you can do the 40 next. The system works, it's great, you get a feeling that you don't have to win every race, but racing cleanly is it's own reward....Hell, that does more for the racing community than people are willing to admit, people will be more focused in driving properly and that's a better and the proper direction for popularizing and esporting racing to a professional setting for gamers....a la cod, SFV etc...


7.) Where's the talk of VR, it a very good implementation, though light in content ATM, but the cogs on this are well oiled, I'm sure it will be fleshed out a bit further down the line.


8.) Most importantly though is the content, you had many arguments on here on how light content would be in GTS...Bollocks...There's is so much content here....So many licenses to do here, so many mission challenges (the bulk of the content and challenge in GTS) , so much to do and learn in circuit experience......Time trials galore, arcade races and split screen for offline with friends et al. I really believe all this talk about GT being light on features and events should be dispelled for what it is...A lie.....I spent a few hours yesterday, getting all the golds from the beginner licenses and going through and briefing through the modes and options....Intermediate licenses are no joke and trying to gold all of this and playing all of this even if you don't go for gold is going to take a long long time....Light on content? certainly no tin this game.

Perhaps others can touch more on scapes, livery etc...because this is not my focus/jam, but this game is definitely more than worth it for all I'm seeing here..........
 

Markoman

Member
Shit, can I get a refund now because metacritic is too low?

The only thing I really want in GTS is a custom grand prix (series of races) option.
Or have I missed something?
 

Emwitus

Member
Overall score seems about what I would give it . Excellent sim racer here but with the single player fiasco, the weather situation , and the car low car count I can see why people are upset . I can see why people are scoring low but gameplay wise this is the best sim racer this gen for me

Amazing how some other games that will not be mentioned got a free pass for not having the same things gt5 and 6 had. (Dynamic weather, time, expansive photomode and cars etc etc )
 

John Wick

Member
The shift from being a CarPG with a full set of championships to being an online centered esports title?

There are different facets to racing, you know. Would you say Mario Kart and GT have the same focus just because they're both racing games?



Get out of here with that level headedness :p

Now your being ridiculous. GT and Mario Kart while racing games in principle are different. GT 6 and GT Sport are the same. Just certain features have been cut or aren't yet added in GT Sport. There is No Massive shift in focus. Maybe online is the main focus but online was available in 6
 

Egida

Neo Member
There is No Massive shift in focus. Maybe online is the main focus but online was available in 6
I'll repeat: The shift from being a CarPG with a full set of championships to being an online centered esports gaas title is not a shift of focus?

I could ignore online in 6 and play the career mode. I can't do that in GTS.
 
Now your being ridiculous. GT and Mario Kart while racing games in principle are different. GT 6 and GT Sport are the same. Just certain features have been cut or aren't yet added in GT Sport. There is No Massive shift in focus. Maybe online is the main focus but online was available in 6

Yes, a "cut certain feature" such as the entirety of the game's CarPG elements, which make GTS and GT6 games with different focuses. Glad you understand now.
 

John Wick

Member
Hold up... Kenziedielocke is free to jump in here to clarify, but why are you so certain he didn't try the beta/demo? He posted in the demo thread:



Originally Posted by inner-G

wow @ that headline 😲 I thought Sony money was so big that almost no outlets would call them out on their BS with this. They obviously need more people to sub to PS+ so they’re basically trying to force it with their biggest franchise.

They should try making one tuned for the particular type of racing game fan that I am next - one who likes playing Gran Turismo, but not online.

You know - like Gran Turismo 1, 2, 3, 4, GTPSP, 5 and 6.

My initial reply was to that guy above inner-G.


It's also not the only time in this thread you've simply dismissed someone's criticism with "you should have tried the demo" (ignoring any potential reasons they may not have been able to). You posted earlier to JackAubrey:



...who also has multiple posts in the GTS demo thread, with his impressions of the game.

Maybe stop assuming any criticism on the game comes exclusively from people that haven't tried it?

"Then you have the other crazies putting the game down because of online focus and no single player and less cars etc etc. Just try the game. You might just like it. We weren't all born playing COD or FIFA online were we???"

That was too inner-G as well
 

Tomeru

Member
So you're saying people aren't allowed to be disappointed when a franchise they liked shifts focus massively?

That is not whathe said. But then there are people who know when to stop and people who take everything personally. It's not mine or your personal game that PD has offended.
 
Is there anybody hand on heart that can say this is exactly what they wanted from the latest GT game?
Well... Close.

I miss the caRPG interface, but they're not wrong that the single player content is pretty beefy. Scapes and photomode is awesome. How sharing and viewing other players' content is seamless and addicting.

Just you know, there's some things that it could have done better.
 

Synth

Member
"Then you have the other crazies putting the game down because of online focus and no single player and less cars etc etc. Just try the game. You might just like it. We weren't all born playing COD or FIFA online were we???"

That was too inner-G as well

What I'm asking, is why you're so sure people haven't tried the demo? Has inner-G explicitly stated that he hasn't tried it? It's one thing to ask if they had, but you're making statements instead.
 

WHM-6R

Neo Member
Its kinda ironic to see cats up in here being all like "HAVE YOU EVEN TRIED IT!!?" When even in this thread you've got people still propping up the false idea that loot boxes have hurt Forza progression.
 
Hopefully these reviews are a wake up call to Polyphony and Sony to make some real changes to this series.

Eurogamer - Recommended

PowerUp! - 9.5/10

Gadgets 360 - 9/10

Progress Bar - 9/10

ZWAME Jogos (Portuguese) - 9/10

PSLife (Danish) - 8.5/10

Worthplaying - 8/10

GamesRadar - 4/5

DarkStation - 4/5

Alphr - 4/5

Yeah big wake up call.......
 
Eurogamer - Recommended

PowerUp! - 9.5/10

Gadgets 360 - 9/10

Progress Bar - 9/10

ZWAME Jogos (Portuguese) - 9/10

PSLife (Danish) - 8.5/10

Worthplaying - 8/10

GamesRadar - 4/5

DarkStation - 4/5

Alphr - 4/5

Yeah big wake up call.......

They fact they completely refocused one of the most popular series of all time and are getting largely positive reviews is a great sign for the quality of the actual game and also this platform going forward.

Still, the scores are no surprise at all. That’s the nature of the beast when you massively change things.
 

Synless

Member
Eurogamer - Recommended

PowerUp! - 9.5/10

Gadgets 360 - 9/10

Progress Bar - 9/10

ZWAME Jogos (Portuguese) - 9/10

PSLife (Danish) - 8.5/10

Worthplaying - 8/10

GamesRadar - 4/5

DarkStation - 4/5

Alphr - 4/5

Yeah big wake up call.......

Lets cherry pick the best review scores when the meta is sitting in the high 70's. For the rest of the quotes I saw, just because you make a change doesn't mean it was the right one as seen by the reviewers. Long development times and average scores should be a wake up call for a developer who was consistently on top for the longest time. It is obvious they are not the best anymore regardless of these brave changes they made.
 

SPCTRE

Member
From what I can tell, this game has a pretty specific target audience, which, I mean yeah, focus can be a very good thing?

Earlier titles might have had a broader appeal, but they also lost themselves in some ways since 1997.
 

MaDKaT

Member
From what I can tell, this game has a pretty specific target audience, which, I mean yeah, focus can be a very good thing?

Earlier titles might have had a broader appeal, but they also lost themselves in some ways since 1997.

Since the 1st game?

2003 with 4 Prologue is more like when things started going south.
 
Lets cherry pick the best review scores when the meta is sitting in the high 70's. For the rest of the quotes I saw, just because you make a change doesn't mean it was the right one as seen by the reviewers. Long development times and average scores should be a wake up call for a developer who was consistently on top for the longest time. It is obvious they are not the best anymore regardless of these brave changes they made.

So it's ok to only use the low scores or the 5 scores on MC ?

These good ones count too.
 

Audioboxer

Member
Metacritic heading near the 70~75 category, maybe I won't need to dine on crow

UWp0WxG.png
 

Brandon F

Well congratulations! You got yourself caught!
Well... Close.

I miss the caRPG interface, but they're not wrong that the single player content is pretty beefy. Scapes and photomode is awesome. How sharing and viewing other players' content is seamless and addicting.

Just you know, there's some things that it could have done better.

This is also my answer.

I get that people REALLY miss the caRPG progression, but the structured challenges in turn have been far more effective at keeping me engaged and delivering a willingness to actually improve my skill threshold with this big dumb steering wheel. There is a lot to dig into despite the flailing argument to the contrary. I loved the concept of the rags to riches career, but it always fell flat and grew tedious after the excitement of buying your first car and never quite delivered for me.

Beyond that, the interface and presentation is beyond anything GT has ever delivered. Loading is snappy, the UX is beautiful, scapes is pointless to me but still adds quite a bit to the veneer with these incredible images cycling through the backdrop. It’s all wonderfully packaged.

But I can empathize that medal-chasing alone isn’t enough for some. Outside of Driveclub and classic Burnout, racing games have either emphasized open world activities or big calendar event progressions and personalized car choices, which is absent here. (Well Forza 7 went backwards too this year, and without loot boxes suffocating the oxygen, I guarantee people would be up in arms over that ‘career’ choice).
 
Top Bottom