PackAPunchedMick
Member
My sentiments exactly. What GTS does focus on is nigh on perfect.
Been playing all day, this is the pinnacle of online multiplayer racing on consoles.
10 out of 10 is deserved for sport mode alone.
Yep. Unsubscribed from GamesRadar what a joke and the reviewer is not even hiding his biasGlad someone exposed them out on their joke of a review, which is blatantly fishing for views and controversy. The thing sounded more like an advertisement for Forza 7 then a GTS review.
I agree but thats not how it works in GT threads.You have to take the good with the bad. A bad score is just a good/valid as a good score.
I agree but thats not how it works in GT threads.
100% wrong. GT5 and 6 were so good with their online lobbies that they decided this entirely new direction for the series because of them.GT has always been an excellent driving simulator. But it really sucked at racing - off- and online.
Which others did you play?
Would have stopped reading right there, if it wasn't placed at the very end of the review... Same level of bullshit as the ""Doesnt look great" one.
I hated both of those games online and never tried them once after the first time. It was hard to find quality racing by just looking at lobbies and cars Warped all over. Was a big reason I was wary about GT Sport.100% wrong. GT5 and 6 were so good with their online lobbies that they decided this entirely new direction for the series because of them.
If it wasnt for the incredible online racing, GT5 would not have been most played game last generation.
Wow I think this is totally
Oof, going by comments here it sounds like the latest Bombcast must be a trashfire for anyone remotely capable of finding some enjoyment out of this game.
Havent listen to GB in a while. Does your comment mean they liked it? Or didnt?Oof, going by comments here it sounds like the latest Bombcast must be a trashfire for anyone remotely capable of finding some enjoyment out of this game.
Yeah totally totally.Wow I think this is totally
Only 3 hours in but damn the game is awesome! Wouldn't expect it to be otherwise. Missed the beta when it ended.
Now for some extra tracks, cars and weather and this game will be glorious!
Wow I think this is totally
Yep. Unsubscribed from GamesRadar what a joke and the reviewer is not even hiding his bias
So Forza still king?
I think you are completelyWow I think this is totally
So would a GT5/6 remaster be a good thing for those persons?I feel like the game is marketed towards the Iracing type of fan, not a casual sim fan that stuck with GT all years, even with the inconsistencies of GT5/6. I would love the polish/visual consistency of this game combined with the content and customizability of the experience of the older games.
I'm just a bit sad that I feel left out of a franchise that I've followed since I was 11.
I guess the proper reviews after taking GTS through it's paces are coming in....Spend some time with the title and it's quite well done and unique in the current space or crop of racers this season...Also, framerate is amazing, a place where GT5/6 was not as solid and criticized last gen...
You remember that? BF4 got great reviews on name alone, but those servers at launch.....Here we have a game with great servers, superb online and none of the early reviews are heralding this in "an online focused game"......DerZuhälter;252415590 said:Reviews should have waited for actual launch. Still suspect online servers to buckle under the load and be faced with a Battlefield 4 sized disaster.
I guess more thorough impressions of what the game is and how it plays are coming in...It's good to see at least...
You conveniently skipped FM7 for a reason:lol. Fascinating that you'd think so, same dude gave FM6 its lowest score on Meta... http://www.gamesradar.com/forza-motorsport-6-review/
Hmmm, another poster declares bias for GTS when the guy gave Forza 7 a 5?....You conveniently skipped FM7 for a reason:
http://www.gamesradar.com/forza-motorsport-7-review/
Would have stopped reading right there, if it wasn't placed at the very end of the review... Same level of bullshit as the ""Doesnt look great" one.
Totally what?
I think you are completely
What seems crazy to me is that this reviewer (as well as some others) dings the game on what it isn't supposed to be (a single player offline game), and counts the bonus VR mode (which he seems to love) as a negative because he wants more of it...PlayStation LifeStyle 7/10
http://www.playstationlifestyle.net...o-sport-review-technical-marvel-ps4/#/slide/1
Speaking as one of these persons, at this point I would take whatever they throw at me. I'm so sad to be left out of the only racing game that ever hooked me.So would a GT5/6 remaster be a good thing for those persons?
What PD has done is built quite an outstanding platform for racing content. The extras, and cyclical content and competitions, will be the key.
www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/gran-turismo-sport/critic-reviewsHighs
- Some of the best visuals in any game to date
- Reworked campaign mode actually teaches you how to race
- esports-focused online mode encourages great racing
- Some of the best sound design and editing in any game
Lows
- Always online DRM can be a huge pain if your connection is spotty
- Lots and lots and lots of missing cars, tracks, and features
Have any of these reviews bothered to mention that you have to be much better at the game this time around in order to enjoy it? It's somewhat like Street Fighter 5 that way. That's a tough change to stomach I imagine.
The scores are lower than I expected tbh.
The scores are lower than I expected tbh.
You conveniently skipped FM7 for a reason:
http://www.gamesradar.com/forza-motorsport-7-review/
Hmmm, another poster declares bias for GTS when the guy gave Forza 7 a 5?....
The scores are lower than I expected tbh.
78, eeek. Im really intrigued with how this one will sell.
Millions easily. How long the community stays with it will be more interesting.
I remember a channel that was specialized in racing sims or something on Youtube, anybody happens to have the link por favor? Hopefully they have a review up soon.
I feel like a racing game that had so much appeal, sold millions of copies, shouldn't go ahead and be that limiting for a specific type of gamer.
TBF GT3 would have been lucky to score an 80 if it released today. Even if it had damage and top notch graphics. It didnt have much more content and you can see that content is the #1 Con on most critics lists.Via Metacritic
GT 96
GT2 93
GT3 A spec 95
GT4 89
GT5 84
GT6 81
GT Sport 78 (which may settle out differently, but I don't think too far from this)
Remarkably consistent decline since A-spec. I wrote a thread 3 years ago asking how you fix GT, and interestingly, two of these problems are somewhat solved. The even quality bar of the cars is there now, which I'm fully behind, and putting real humans in there is an interesting way to fix the driving AI. I can't escape the feeling that this is a real monkey paw situation though. As broken as much of GT was, these are not the solutions that I - and I think a lot of fans - were hoping for. I think the scores reflect that.
I think the key is the last point. I don't think Kaz needs to go entirely, but he needs to recognize this series is enormously diminished from its former self, and that he needs other, probably Western racing developer input.
This is not to say people won't love this game and have every right to. It's just so disappointing for a fan like me to see that he's taken what I loved about it - the SP experience - and effectively scrapped it (please, no "there IS a campaign!" posts), while scaling way back the number of tracks.
Really hoping for some kind of 1 year major update which adds a full campaign, and by then we'll have seen a huge boost in cars and tracks, all at launch price.