InsaneTiger
Member
You can finally pop that nut.Xbox One X
Full NATIVE 4K vs pro
Greater LOD vs pro
Extremely high res textures vs pro
66% more pixels output vs pro
Greater Draw Distance vs pro
Sublime
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
DF: Shadow of War: Early Xbox One X vs PS4 Pro Graphics Comparison + Frame-Rate test
- Thread starter Theorry
- Start date
Xbox One X
Full NATIVE 4K vs pro
Greater LOD vs pro
Extremely high res textures vs pro
66% more pixels output vs pro
Greater Draw Distance vs pro
Sublime
This forum never disappoints
That's interesting and good to know. The DF video made it sound as if these textures were all fixed on the Xbox One X.
immortald3ath
Member
Xbox One X
Full NATIVE 4K vs pro
Greater LOD vs pro
Extremely high res textures vs pro
66% more pixels output vs pro
Greater Draw Distance vs pro
Sublime
And it begins...tides have turned.
EtherMagic
Member
Accident
RichiRamjag
Member
Its not an artistically pretty game. I dont know what to tell you. The one X improvements are obvious and cool to see, but it will be nice to see what it can do with a prettier game. I personally want to see the differences in AC origins myself.
Any word on how filling the extra 4GB with higher resolution textures affects load times?
Ill be really curious to hear how developers decide to arrange content on disk. Avoiding seek times by co-mingling assets for an area is a straightforward and effective solution when all systems have the same needs. It gets more complex with optional UHD asset packs, and even in best case loading twice as much will take twice as long. Hopefully there are enough architectural changes to improve load times compared to the base model in order to mitigate or eliminate any regression here.
Load times are one of the reasons Im betting against the historical 8-16x bump in total memory next generation.
Ill be really curious to hear how developers decide to arrange content on disk. Avoiding seek times by co-mingling assets for an area is a straightforward and effective solution when all systems have the same needs. It gets more complex with optional UHD asset packs, and even in best case loading twice as much will take twice as long. Hopefully there are enough architectural changes to improve load times compared to the base model in order to mitigate or eliminate any regression here.
Load times are one of the reasons Im betting against the historical 8-16x bump in total memory next generation.
Hawk269
Member
I have been saying the same thing. Even without 4k texture you still need more ram. When I went to 4k on my pc the amount of ram is higher when in 4k than in 1080p, it just needs more to do 4k. Then you add in 4k textures and it needs even more.
The decision to go from 8gb total to 12 was smart but even with that Ms at first said 8gb for games and 4 for the dashboard then they reallocated another 1gb to games reducing dashboard to 3gb to give devs even more ram.
MaximusPayne
Member
What the hell happened with the Pro there. The difference shouldn't be that great, should it?
mordecaii83
Member
XBX definitely showing an improvement on the PS4 Pro. It's good that developers are going the extra mile to use the full resources on both systems.
Hippopuncher12
Member
This is what is going to be happening I would imagine from now on. Every couple of years that tide is going to turn back and forth if we keep getting mid gen cycles.
ToxicPhantom
Member
I can see that too, MS and Sony leapfrogging each other with newer beefed up systems. I guess it's no difference when a new GPU launches every year. Business.
Looks like another good port. Interested to see how well it compares to a high end PC.
This post is almost unsettling. These are pieces of plastic to play games, not some weapon for your stupid console war.
Xbox One X
Full NATIVE 4K vs pro
Greater LOD vs pro
Extremely high res textures vs pro
66% more pixels output vs pro
Greater Draw Distance vs pro
Sublime
This post is almost unsettling. These are pieces of plastic to play games, not some weapon for your stupid console war.
I feel like I haven't seen comments like these since the early days of this gen in 2013 and 2014...
probably from people like me... 😐
PS4 Pro with that cataracts quality ground texturing
They all look the same to me.
Did you expect something else?
These comparisons are fun but as a primarily Xbox gamer(I have all 3 though), I am more interested in the xbox one Vs the X. Seems to be quite the jump. Its why I didnt a pro. Im happy with my ps4 performance for the most part. The jump from the Original X1 to the X will be great.
InsaneTiger
Member
Joke post? There's even a noticeable difference between the two modes on the Xbox version.
In Mordor the textures were at least inconsistent on Pro. There were examples like this but also cases where they were never as blurry as that.
In SoW they look unacceptable on all platforms if we're being honest.
Yeah, I don't get the surprise. The consoles are all x86 and related APUs at that. We're basically at the point of comparing GPU benchmark listings. It's no longer a debate between PS3 being technically more capable, but not effectively due to architecture. They're the same architecture now, same APU design, same OEM.
With that said it totally is possible for a game to so heavily depend on something like more RAM that it excessively runs worse on other hardware than it should.
Put your spectacles on gramps
digitalrelic
Banned
Yeah, seriously, the difference is insane in pretty much all of the shots on the DF written review:
I would expect, at least for XB owners, the price is quite right if you're trading in. I'm getting rid of my S with around seven games. Should drop about $200 off that price.
Nah. If anything the Pro's price seems nuts now. You get a lot for $500.
HellforLeather
Member
its an improvement for sure....is it a $500 worthy improvment? eehhhhhhhhhh. Ill probably just wait for whatever the real "next gen" will be.
Good one.
Not its a $100 improvement.
There's definitely quite an improvement there for people. 😊
I do still think it's an ugly game though, even when I've seen people playing it on a top level PC with maximum settings. I imagine that's something we'll get if there's a follow up to this one too as I felt the original game was ugly as hell and that ran at 4K.
You know, personal preferences and all, it's still quite an improvement over the other consoles for people who do like these games.
I do still think it's an ugly game though, even when I've seen people playing it on a top level PC with maximum settings. I imagine that's something we'll get if there's a follow up to this one too as I felt the original game was ugly as hell and that ran at 4K.
You know, personal preferences and all, it's still quite an improvement over the other consoles for people who do like these games.
OdysseusVA
Banned
Doesn't seem worth the price difference
Colbert
Banned
That was almost certainly a joke post!
digitalrelic
Banned
One more, this time with distant background objects:
The difference is staggering.
The difference is staggering.
Hippopuncher12
Member
I fully expect the Pro to drop by $50 around the same time this comes out.
phoisgood495
Member
If your baseline is a $400 PS4 Pro then you already upgraded once this generation.
If your baseline is a base PS4/Xbox One then the jump is MUCH larger. Still probably not worth $500 to most folks, but if I had to make a choice between them and I was going for a "Premium" console I don't think the $100 difference in price would matter to me so I would opt for the best available.
Oh I will
One more, this time with distant background objects:
The difference is staggering.
Just DoF.