AceBandage
Banned
GTA V was hinted at strongly yes with them even saying Rockstar was one of the first 3rd parties to get a kit to enable GTA V
Which makes sense.
They were also one of the first to get Wii dev kits.
GTA V was hinted at strongly yes with them even saying Rockstar was one of the first 3rd parties to get a kit to enable GTA V
I'm pretty sure GTAV will come to Wii U, wasn't it right there with the very first Cafe rumors on 01.net?
Pretty much. 01.net has the best
INDUSTRY SOURCES
Well, they have Ubisoft, at least.
They Ninjas got to them, though. They've been silent ever since E3.
some random thoughts:
- The Wii U is Nintendo's first brand-new console architecture since 2001 (or technically, 1999). People who use the Wii's lack of power as some kind of indicator of the Wii U don't factor in how the Wii was basically just the second half of Gamecube's hardware cycle. Like Kinect and Move, Wii was the Gamecube's mid-cycle upgrade - with the same old late-90's tech the purple box had, just sped up by 50%. Wii U is the start of a new hardware cycle altogether, something which just could not be said for Wii.
- It's going to be interesting when people do the math and realize that 1) they mostly play their handheld game devices at home and 2) the Wii U is going to be the most powerful home-based handheld game device possible. Sure it'll cost much more than a gaming-only handheld, but it is also a next-gen console. I can't stress enough how much of a brilliant move that is, and I'm kind of baffled as to why I haven't seen more articles pointing this out.
- (This kind of already happened, but) once they're leaked, Wii U specs will be placed side-by-side with 360/PS3 specs by people who think they can be directly compared. People who do know they can't be directly compared... will also do it [read: get ready for some of the most hilariously awful, flame-bait ridden gaming journalism in history].
Gaf, what are the possibilities that...Nintendo buys Team Ninja, Crytek, and starup jp companies?
what about the nintendo doomad stuff?
what about the nintendo doomad stuff?
Since THQ stock is trading for pennies, how about we pool our money, buy the company, then give the IPs to Nintendo?
Since THQ stock is trading for pennies, how about we pool our money, buy the company, then give the IPs to Nintendo?
Try to think of the dumbest, most idiotic baseless bullshit reason you can.Is this really a point of speculation? Why wouldnt GTA 5 be on Wii u?......The real question is whether it will use the controller in a special way or have betta graphics (which is a question for all Wii U games)
Is this really a point of speculation? Why wouldnt GTA 5 be on Wii u?......The real question is whether it will use the controller in a special way or have betta graphics (which is a question for all Wii U games)
what is wrong with THQ? I do want a Saints Row 3rd for my Wii U that game needs me
I hope GDC is a good one for us in this thread
Yes! I just got mine in the mail!IS IT OUT YET
Try to think of the dumbest, most idiotic baseless bullshit reason you can.
And then imagine something 10x dumber.
That would be why it wouldn't be on Wii U.
Their market share dropped drastically due to udraw bomba on ps360. Now they are firing people and abandoning casual gaming in order to stay in NASDAQ.
Their market share dropped drastically due to udraw bomba on ps360. Now they are firing people and abandoning casual gaming in order to stay in NASDAQ.
How could one bomba ruin a company so bad. And it was a casual bomba... as if that matters. But still. I don't get it.
Since THQ stock is trading for pennies, how about we pool our money, buy the company, then give the IPs to Nintendo?
How could one bomba ruin a company so bad. And it was a casual bomba... as if that matters. But still. I don't get it.
That reminds me.. I wonder if they will port Saints Row the Third to Wii U as a launch title.
Don't know the costs/debt related to that, but assume any little bit counts for them now.
Then there is GTA VI for the next generation consoles from Microsoft and Sony respectively to take in aspect, and this leads us back to the path of discussing which console will be most powerful and if it would be profitable/sensible for developer X to bring title Y to Wii U. I personally believe the power ratio between the three next generation consoles will be similar to that of the sixth-generation era (Xbox>Gamecube>PlayStation 2). At least it most probably won't be such a huge gap as between Wii and PlayStation 3/Xbox 360.I'm not that sure that GTAV will come to Wii U either, I think Rockstar can skip the system just like Crystal Dynamics with Tomb Raider, and Kojima with Project Ogre *sigh*
was it really because of uDraw?
uDraw did so well on the Wii they should research the hardware install base casuals was a Wii thing
Rösti;34868432 said:If Nintendo would be able to persuade Rockstar to bring GTA V as a launch title for Wii U, it could mean much. And while unlikely to happen, a timed exclusive (let's say for one or two days) could certainly bring some early adopters (while probably angering those without interest for Nintendo's console). But I'm kinda thinking the same as you, TunaLover. With a predicted launch of GTA V in either summer '12 or autumn '12, Rockstar perhaps will feel they won't be able to deliver a certain quality to the Wii U version, at least if development hasn't started already.
We've seen over and over again.. Nintendo makes overtures, third party officials give vaguely-positive-but-noncommittal statements, obstacles to development/publication seem minimal, Reggie comments on his lobbying effort, and then..
"Announcing Good Game III, for Playstation, Xbox, and.. Nokia handhelds!"
No Nintendo console logo at the bottom of the ad. Hmm. Shocker.
Then, in the aftermath, we hear Paper-Thin Excuse #47 for why they decided to skip the Nintendo console this time around. But we can't talk about the b.s. excuse in the game's announcement thread too much.. lest you run the risk of being accused of port begging.
You guys seem way too trusting and optimistic, like the past decade never happened. Each time we said, "but this time is different!" only to find disappointment. I'd love to be very, very wrong on this.. but I'll believe it when I see it.
It's pretty much confirmed it the wii U will decent third party support at launch and post launch. But keep thinking that.We've seen over and over again.. Nintendo makes overtures, third party officials give vaguely-positive-but-noncommittal statements, obstacles to development/publication seem minimal, Reggie comments on his lobbying effort, and then..
"Announcing Good Game III, for Playstation, Xbox, and.. Nokia handhelds!"
No Nintendo console logo at the bottom of the ad. Hmm. Shocker.
Then, in the aftermath, we hear Paper-Thin Excuse #47 for why they decided to skip the Nintendo console this time around. But we can't talk about the b.s. excuse in the game's announcement thread too much.. lest you run the risk of being accused of port begging.
You guys seem way too trusting and optimistic, like the past decade never happened. Each time we said, "but this time is different!" only to find disappointment. I'd love to be very, very wrong on this.. but I'll believe it when I see it.
My dream would be Nintendo announcing a partnership with Wacom for the WiiU.
Get ready to pay 200 bucks per pad.
I admire your pessimism, but people should just stop hating Nintendo because they're Nintendo. They're weird, yes, and make weird decisions which aren't always to the benefit of...anyone. But the company's "wildcard" nature and unpredictability is whats keeping the competition going, instead of making it go into another crash.You guys seem way too trusting and optimistic, like the past decade never happened. Each time we said, "but this time is different!" only to find disappointment. I'd love to be very, very wrong on this.. but I'll believe it when I see it.
Best drawing tablet ever. And cheaper than a Cintiq.
I admire your pessimism, but people should just stop hating Nintendo because they're Nintendo. They're weird, yes, and make weird decisions which aren't always to the benefit of...anyone. But the company's "wildcard" nature and unpredictability is whats keeping the competition going, instead of making it go into another crash.
In short, we await what is Nintendo's answer to "so what's after motion controls and HD?". Even with the unviel, the answers are not all that clear ("It's a fucking tablet! OMGNINTENDODOOMED!!!!!11").
Sorry.. ten years of hearing bullshit makes a man jaded. Tough to keep myself in check. But like I said, if I'm wrong, I'll be elated to be wrong.
(And hating Nintendo seems to be an industry-wide pasttime sometimes. Very tiresome.)
In a way, the optimism leading-up to this launch is echoing what we heard running-up to the Wii launch. Third party offerings were kinda decent around the Wii launch time frame, but the dropoff in games output in following years is what really irks me.
In a way, I really hope that Sony brings its own tablet/Vita control scheme to the PS4 so that the Nintendo-Has-a-Tablet-Controller Excuse becomes less viable.
There are really only two possibilities.
1. They had such short attention spans and horrible memories that they forgot the rumors, inside information, and press releases from Nintendo that they themselves reported on as early as April of that year. (Considering even Mr. Fils-Aime said it was a new console before the video reel was shown,their attentions spans may actually indeed be that short.)
2. They decided that a little "confusion" would be worth some clicks and faux-drama. So they acted like they had never heard of Project Cafe having the very same screen controller that it displayed and acted with confusion as to there actually being a console. Instead of "Rumors of Wii U having a touchscreen controller are true," they ran "Wii U JUST a controller?" instead.
I highly doubt #2 is more plausible, but it's still a possibility. On the other hand, #1 would require game journalists to have forgotten news that they broke themselves. They'd have to be untalented hacks in order for that to happen.
I don't really see any middle ground between the two. There's no way for anybody to have been following "Project Cafe," as Nintendo focused journalists or not, know about the rumors of a touch screen controller for the new console, and think zebras instead of horses when that controller is shown and assume there is no console. Unless they somehow forgot their own scoops.
This isn't to say there was no confusion possible, but any confusion probably lasted maybe 12 hours, after which they showed images of the console on the PR reports and floor models. This "confusion" really had no relevance then and it certainly doesn't now.
I think some are remembering Wii launch as worse in hindsight. Remember, at time of launch noone had HDTV and the graphics looked pretty good cos 360 and ps3 didnt look that much better yet. and it didnt even matter anyway cos everyone was soo blown away by the idea of motion controls.
Wii U should have a relatively easy time in Japan, thanks to DQX. It might even get some numbered FF as a multiplat. In the West... moneyhats?
In a way, the optimism leading-up to this launch is echoing what we heard running-up to the Wii launch. Third party offerings were kinda decent around the Wii launch time frame, but the dropoff in games output in following years is what really irks me.
Eh, getting FF isn't that big of a deal.
The franchise is slowly dying thanks to SE's ineptitude.
The Wii U already has a better third-party support (Darksiders 2, Arkham City, Lego Cities, Metro: Last Light, Colonial Marines,) than the Wii ever did.
True, but now that the mainlines FF are multi-plat, I don't see why it can't come to Wii U.
Nintendo did everything they were willing to do to get Vice City and San Andreas late ports on the Gamecube. It did not succeed.