I posted one of these a page or two back but here's another bit from a blog called Vicarious Existence with some armchair salary analysis of 38 studios, which points towards the possibility that the incentivised $75 mil loan might have been what brought the company down.
Forward Planning
So whats my point? That chasing 450 local jobs in order to get that US$75m loan from Rhode Island appears to have been a key cause in the current problem. Im sure 38 Studios thought they were getting a good deal lots of investment, no publisher to tell them what to do, plus they were getting paid to grow as did Rhode Island here comes a new, sexy, financially attractive industry that will create jobs but the current situation shows the error in their thinking.
Big, one-off payments are attractive, but every one of those hired employees has ongoing and continuous costs associated with them. It may have made more financial sense (but would likely have had political ramifications) if 38 Studios had not hired as many people and just paid the $7500 per vacant position per year penalty.
Lets pretend that once 38 Studios got to December 2011, they froze at 125 FTEs [Full Time Employees]. Theyd lose that US$3.1m payment, plus be charged (125 x $7500) $937.5k in penalties at the start of 2012, but thats a one-off cost that would be less than hiring the loan-required extra 125 FTEs for 4 months (and obviously those FTEs were hired for the full year, so would have cost a lot more than the penalty).
It would have kept costs under control, plus it is hard to know what those extra 125 employees have achieved given that Project Copernicus release date has slipped 9 months despite its employee growth.
Economics is sometimes about the alignment of incentives to achieve the desired behaviour. It looks to me like Rhode Island, in its eagerness to start a new industry, has ended up incentivising 38 Studios (and 38 Studios happily took that money) onto the brink of its own destruction.