• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Games Journalism! Wainwright/Florence/Tomb Raider/Eurogamer/Libel Threats/Doritos

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zeliard

Member
I know GAF is all GAME JOURNALISM: SERIOUS BUSINESS.. but it's games... and in the end it's entertainment... and if you really think big review are all biased.. then we have GAF.

The two concepts aren't mutually exclusive. It's perfectly possible to have relatively light and enthusiastic games writing without laughable, elementary breaches in journalistic ethics that throw into question the honesty of your opinions and your general veracity.

It's not like it has to be particularly hard-hitting work, though on occasion it can and should have an investigative bent and reach into more important topics relevant to the industry. If your intention as a games writer is to give honest assessments, then it helps to keep certain very basic things in check, e.g. your relationship to the people whose work you're covering. That doesn't even require being a 'journalist'; it requires a modicum of sense.
 

NervousXtian

Thought Emoji Movie was good. Take that as you will.
What does any of that have to do with anything? You call it stalking, but she's putting that information out there publicly. She has a degree in journalism and operates in PR yet doesn't know how to keep shit private on the Internet?

If you don't want people calling you out for bullshit, then don't act a fool or decide to be an arrogant asshole on a public forum (Twitter).



So let people get away with lying and being assholes, stop taking your hobby seriously, and stop trying to improve the state of coverage your hobby gets? Ok...

She's a nobody, it's past the point of pointing and laughing at this point.

Whose being cruel? The truth is the truth. When gaf shows more journalistic intent that supposed games journalists then theres a problem.

Most game journalism is just really PR.

Gonna have to explain this

Have you seen what she's done? Basically nothing.
 

Auto_aim1

MeisaMcCaffrey
H5MER.jpg


How can people be so hostile towards him? So disappointing.
 

JABEE

Member
So I guess IGN didn't bat an eyelid that she was also doing work for S-E on the side while writing an article on an S-E game?

Even writing about games that are S-E's direct competitors is a lapse in IGN's screening process. No one should be taking a paycheck from a publisher.
 
in a year's month's week's time no one is going to care about this idiot girl or her idiot, self-serving and deceptive behavior. nobody.

there is no justice to be had here.
 

EXGN

Member
What does any of that have to do with anything? You call it stalking, but she's putting that information out there publicly. She has a degree in journalism and operates in PR yet doesn't know how to keep shit private on the Internet?

If you don't want people calling you out for bullshit, then don't act a fool or decide to be an arrogant asshole on a public forum (Twitter).

I dunno, I guess I just don't think eternal public humiliation is an acceptable "punishment" for saying something foolish, particularly when the people who are crucifying her only do so because they can hide behind the veil of anonymity.

We all make mistakes and say/do stupid things. The fact that this person who is studying to be a journalist is now having her reputation besmirched before she even leaves college, that sucks. Recruiters are going to look up her name and she's gonna be linked to this shit storm, and it's because a bunch of people who never even heard of her decided to go on a witch hunt after they read a tweet they didn't like.
 

RotBot

Member
I'm only reading through the first and last pages, but this post seems ridiculous. There is a difference between calling someone out and going on some witch hunt that involves cyberstalking and investigating them for the sole purpose defaming them.

People digging through her LinkedIn and other profiles are just anonymous assholes that get their rocks off by humiliating others, that behavior should never be tolerated and I can't believe anyone defends trying to ruin the career of another - especially over something as stupid and petty as games criticism.

Guarantee that if these people doing the stalking were publicly known people, they wouldn't say shit.

I hope you're enjoying the irony of having described what is basically the mechanics of investigative journalism as cyberstalking when it's conducted by forumgoers.

I would have agreed with you before the whole libel/censorship/resignation fiasco occurred. But by sending that takedown request to Eurogamer, she's made herself a public figure, and has invited all the scrutiny being one involves.
 

enzo_gt

tagged by Blackace
Just caught up on the thread.

Wow, how can you possibly be that stupid, Wainright? Now I don't like to wish for people to lose their jobs, but really, she has tried her very hardest to prove that she doesn't deserve a job in journalism. How fucking shady can you be? Jesus.
 

pbhawks45

Banned

Jesus, I've only read that first article, and I'm cringing. I get having to write advertised content. I'm a fellow unemployed journalist, and let me tell you, even with great credentials, it's hard to find a job. But good lord, do your advertising writing in another venue, one where you won't have to worry about conflict of interest.
 

BigDes

Member
She's a nobody, it's past the point of pointing and laughing at this point.



Most game journalism is just really PR.



Have you seen what she's done? Basically nothing.

I'm more interested in why you feel working in the gaming press means you don't have to worry about things like ethics.

I would also question her being nothing

She wrote a review that appeared in The Sun newspaper likely while being paid by the company that made the game. The Sun is (shamefully) the most popular newspaper in the UK by a quite significant margin. It is not unlikely that more people would have seen that review than any review on a specialist website
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
I dunno, I guess I just don't think eternal public humiliation is an acceptable "punishment" for saying something foolish, particularly when the people who are crucifying her only do so because they can hide behind the veil of anonymity.

We all make mistakes and say/do stupid things. The fact that this person who is studying to be a journalist is now having her reputation besmirched before she even leaves college, that sucks. Recruiters are going to look up her name and she's gonna be linked to this shit storm, and it's because a bunch of people who never even heard of her decided to go on a witch hunt after they read a tweet they didn't like.

You know what?

She can end this at any time.

If she comes clean, owns up to trying to cover everything up, and apologizes about threatening a lawsuit over some bullshit (assuming that part is true), and then commits to actually doing a good job, this whole thing will cool down and blow over.

Instead? She continues to dig a hole. We all make mistakes, but people need to realize that what they did was a mistake and own up to it.
 

Osiris

I permanently banned my 6 year old daughter from using the PS4 for mistakenly sending grief reports as it's too hard to watch or talk to her
H5MER.jpg


How can people be so hostile towards him? So disappointing.

Cardinal rule (for some) - Don't rock the boat, bite the hand that feeds you etc.

The same two defenses get trotted out whenever the ugly truth of most some parts of the gaming press are revealed: "It's only games, why so serious?" and "It doesn't really happen, I've never seen in in 20 years, it was a one-off!".

At least until the fury dies down, and they can get back to using twitter for self-fellatio again, until the next incident causes light to fall upon the cockroaches of the industry.
 

RaffAO

Member
There's irony in the fact that this was published on Eurogamer.

Their Darkfall review a few years ago by a lazy freelance hack who'd obviously barely played the game, and the subsequent whitewash, is one of the most blatant examples of UK game journos covering each other's arses when one of them is exposed as inept.
 
This article from a Forbes contributor is really good

The subject of gaming journalism is always ripe for a good controversy.

Are game journalists too deeply connected to the industry they purportedly cover?

Do the tentacles of the PR machine wrap too tightly around the journalists who ought to be writing critically about the games and companies they are covering?

Or does the simple fact that we form relationships with the people in the industry we cover, and that we are inevitably fans of many of the games we write about, make this particular industry an enormously and surprisingly difficult one to write frankly about?

http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkai...ence-leaves-eurogamer-after-libel-complaints/
 

zaxon

Member
if only there was something showing her saying she was working for SE AND writing about their games at the same time. oh wait, there is.

Err, there is no conclusive evidence in any of that. Her two SE reviews came out in 2010 and August 2011. The Tomb Raider piece was published in November 2011. The game she consulted on was not released in the west until January 2012, and unless I'm missing something nothing she's said indicates she worked on it before those articles were published.

Anyway, the tweet she made that everyone is using as proof of hypocrisy states that she didn't review the games she consulted on, not that she never reviewed squenix games.
 

EXGN

Member
I hope you're enjoying the irony of having described what is basically the mechanics of investigative journalism as cyberstalking when it's conducted by forumgoers.

I would have agreed with you before the whole libel/censorship/resignation fiasco occurred. But by sending that takedown request to Eurogamer, she's made herself a public figure, and has invited all the scrutiny being one involves.

Let me make this clear, I think what she did was stupid and handled in the worst possible way and that she really exacerbated the whole situation with the takedown request.

That said, I would put forth that the difference between cyberstalking and investigative journalism is in the intent. Investigative journalism is done by a professional in an effort to discover the truth. This "cyberstalking" is done only to antagonize someone that has done something that people don't like.

It's the difference between a police officer shooting a crook in the line of duty and a mob of vigilantes breaking into the crook's house and murdering him.
 

NHale

Member
He basically exposed a big industry gathering between journalists and PR. That's not going to go over well with a lot of people.

Which proves the point he made on the article. In the end, the behavior of PR and "journalists" joining forces against the article actually proved the whole point of the article.

Unfortunately he ended up losing his job.
 

Amagon

Member
I hate to be that guy but I'm lost on what is going on after the first couple pages. Can someone explain it to me like a 5 year old.

I feel stupid, lol.
 

wotta

Member
Attention Journalists, I have some information for you:

Mountain dew & dorito Cupcakes!

You will need:

Mountain Dew
Boxed cake mix lemon or white
Frosting (vanilla) but you can use butter cream if you like
Doritos

First boiled a can of mountain dew on the stove to try and carmalize it a little bit then added that to the cake mix instead of water. Next mix it then bake per box instructions.

For the frosting boil another can of mountain dew then mix it with the vanilla frosting and top the cupcakes with the frosting and crushed up doritos!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom