I'm loathe to publish misleading information. And I've said before I don't mind being wrong, but that's not totally true - I'm not afraid to be wrong, but I'd rather not look stupid. I do think there's a group of people out there that get their giggles giving out false information, so as much as I want to believe certain things, as much as my gut tells me they're accurate, I'm hesitant to conclusively state "this is what this thing is." And there are things that need to happen for me to know what Durango and Orbis really are that rely on talking to other people. So if I did have certain information, it would take time to do all of these things.
Also, I'm not going to spill something that juicy on GAF before it went live where I work. Come on guys. Not to say that stops me from adding a little bit to the conversation here and there (and correcting inaccurate statements I've made when my understanding changes).
And on top of that if you're wrong about the smallest of things, people childishly crucify you for it from that point on and then post drivel like "LOL Polygon".
Of course. And from what we've been hearing, a sizeable amount will be used for Kinect-related stuff on Xbox.
Remember Epic's push for 512MB on the 360...
Is it that hard to say "This is what we've heard."
Acting like something is fact will get you bashed, but just stating hearsay and mentioning that before going on is safe in everyone's book.
Is it that hard to say "This is what we've heard."
Acting like something is fact will get you bashed, but just stating hearsay and mentioning that before going on is safe in everyone's book.
Is it that hard to say "This is what we've heard."
Acting like something is fact will get you bashed, but just stating hearsay and mentioning that before going on is safe in everyone's book.
it is funny though that the verge has almost completely stopped posting rumours of their own ever since they got the iphone 5 horribly wrong.Vox generally has a really solid rumor reputation, so I imagine they want to maintain that.
Once you start getting multiple incorrect rumors, many people start taking you less seriously.
From the leaked "92821757-XBox-720-9-24-Checkpoint-Draft-1" document (which may or may not represent Microsoft's current plans):And if these systems are expected to go until 2018/2019/2020... 1.8TF isn't going to cut it. Neither is 4GB of RAM... however fast it is. People are only looking at it from the perspective of what we have now. No one is looking forward and trying to plan accordingly.
I'm loathe to publish misleading information. And I've said before I don't mind being wrong, but that's not totally true - I'm not afraid to be wrong, but I'd rather not look stupid. I do think there's a group of people out there that get their giggles giving out false information, so as much as I want to believe certain things, as much as my gut tells me they're accurate, I'm hesitant to conclusively state "this is what this thing is." And there are things that need to happen for me to know what Durango and Orbis really are that rely on talking to other people. So if I did have certain information, it would take time to do all of these things.
Also, I'm not going to spill something that juicy on GAF before it went live where I work. Come on guys. Not to say that stops me from adding a little bit to the conversation here and there (and correcting inaccurate statements I've made when my understanding changes).
ok, so consoles will be powerful. But how about relaxing rules to access their walled gardens? I don't want to be fed with the same juvenile shooters which just look better.
If the next Xbox comes packed with a new Kinect, I don't see how it would be possible for them to also have the more powerful console without costing too much.
Of course bandwidth is important, one just has to look at all PS3 games that suffered from low-res effects due to lower bandwidth for an example. But, especially regarding the visuals and realization of worlds that I expect from next-gen, if you don't have memory capacity, where are you going to put the data? What I really mean is, not only do I want fast RAM, I want as much as they can provide within the confines of their power/cost limitations.
It's the OS isn't it?VG247 is close but off. NowGamer got trolled.
If the next Xbox comes packed with a new Kinect, I don't see how it would be possible for them to also have the more powerful console without costing too much.
XBLIG was about as open a platform as it's possible to have on a console... hardly anyone cared.ok, so consoles will be powerful. But how about relaxing rules to access their walled gardens?
It all depends on how well the system is balanced. Durango bandwidth is rumored to be ~68 GB/s, which means it will only be able to access 2 GB of data per frame at 30fps. This is shared between CPU and GPU, so the actual figure for textures and geometry will be significantly lower. All the memory above 2 GB is used as a cache and not actually used to render the individual frames.
Orbis will have 192 GB/s bandwidth, about 6 GB per frame at 30fps and 3 GB at 60fps, which means memory size will potentially be a bottleneck for 30fps games since the GPU could probably consume more data than it is available, while it would be perfectly balanced for 60fps games.
If the rumored specs are real, I expect developers to target 30fps on Durango and 60fps on Orbis.
It all depends on how well the system is balanced. Durango bandwidth is rumored to be ~68 GB/s, which means it will only be able to access 2 GB of data per frame at 30fps. This is shared between CPU and GPU, so the actual figure for textures and geometry will be significantly lower. All the memory above 2 GB is used as a cache and not actually used to render the individual frames.
Orbis will have 192 GB/s bandwidth, about 6 GB per frame at 30fps and 3 GB at 60fps, which means memory size will potentially be a bottleneck for 30fps games since the GPU could probably consume more data than it is available, while it would be perfectly balanced for 60fps games.
If the rumored specs are real, I expect developers to target 30fps on Durango and 60fps on Orbis.
It all depends on how well the system is balanced. Durango bandwidth is rumored to be ~68 GB/s, which means it will only be able to access 2 GB of data per frame at 30fps. This is shared between CPU and GPU, so the actual figure for textures and geometry will be significantly lower. All the memory above 2 GB is used as a cache and not actually used to render the individual frames.
Orbis will have 192 GB/s bandwidth, about 6 GB per frame at 30fps and 3 GB at 60fps, which means memory size will potentially be a bottleneck for 30fps games since the GPU could probably consume more data than it is available, while it would be perfectly balanced for 60fps games.
If the rumored specs are real, I expect developers to target 30fps on Durango and 60fps on Orbis.
If I learned one thing from this gen than it is that it doesn't matter which console is better technically.
The console wars were a waste of time. And I hope we do not pick up on it again, guys.
What's sold the PS3 is the same that's sold the 360. FIFA, Cod, BF, Guitar Hero. Have a look at the best selling games for each of the consoles, there are few exclusives in there.
If I learned one thing from this gen than it is that it doesn't matter which console is better technically.
The console wars were a waste of time. And I hope we do not pick up on it again, guys.
You have a WIIU for that sir.I want my 1080p, 60fps 3D games. With the texture resolution and IQ exceeding what i can get with my PC right now.
I think people fail to appreciate the massive, gaping gap in power between a high-end PC and last-gen consoles.There won't be a huge graphical leap this gen.
lol Nope.
- Windows 8
- Microsoft malware spying on you to gather information for Bing!
- Dat RAM for dem advertisements!
- Kinect OS RAMz
- XBox Live Gold Paid Feature : Free 512mb of RAM from OS
I think people fail to appreciate the massive, gaping gap in power between a high-end PC and last-gen consoles.
It's perfectly possible for both these statements to be true (and I think both are):
- next gen consoles will be significantly weaker than high-end PCs
- next-gen consoles will provide a significant leap compared to PS360U
The recent DmC thread gives a nice indication of this gap: The game runs at 30 FPS, 720p on consoles and at 200 FPS, 1080p on a single GPU that isn't even top of the line. That's 15 times the amount of shaded pixels.
Crazy thing is some of that is likely true. Kinect, Windows 8, graphics and transition for ads, inrergrated store. Something as simple as the Vita OS is enough for me, all I need is a light OS that allows me to multitask and put the game on standby.
Crazy thing is some of that is likely true. Kinect, Windows 8, graphics and transition for ads, inrergrated store. Something as simple as the Vita OS is enough for me, all I need is a light OS that allows me to multitask and put the game on standby.
If you are not impressed by Watch_Dogs, Agnis Philosophy, or Star Wars 1313- you will hate next-gen.
I'm inclined to agree.My gut tells me two out of those three are launch window.
Agnis is just a tech demo.My gut tells me two out of those three are launch window.
That's good, because 2 out of the three aren't that graphically impressive.My gut tells me two out of those three are launch window.
That's good, because 2 out of the three aren't that graphically impressive.
Good for me. They blow anything this gen out of the water.That's good, because 2 out of the three aren't that graphically impressive.
When did it ever stop?
Sorry but the Console Warz of 2013 is getting ready to heat up and I honestly believe we'll have more casualties then we did with the unveiling of last gen.
That is seriously crazy talk. I also expect "next-gen" versions of BioShock Infinite and Crysis 3 this fall.
ITT people arguing dick length when it's all about girth.