• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

VGleaks: Orbis Unveiled! [Updated]

You forget about inflation?

Here are launch prices for the most successful consoles, adjusted for inflation:

4th gen: Super Nintendo - $351.33
5th gen: PlayStation - $464.77
6th gen: PlayStation 2 - $400
7th gen: Wii - $284.71

No I understand inflation. Also look at the Wii.

The console space I feel is different than before with outside pressures. Plus they psychology of it all...
 

meta4

Junior Member
yeah, maybe it's the data move engines? it seems strange for a developer to say the difference is the same as that between the gamecube and xbox only to learn that sony potentially have a massive advantage.

something doesn't add up.

Maybe the specs leaked for Durango are wrong?
 
I really wish the GPU was halfway between an 8850 and 8870, but console specs do change constantly and maybe, just maybe we will see the new HSA GPUs in the final product.
 

RoboPlato

I'd be in the dick
Get excited baby!

I'm expecting more actual games to be shown that were used to.

Same here. I'm kind of hoping for an official announcement shortly before E3 with tech demos then have E3 be a game blowout. If it's launching within 6 months of E3 a lot games have to be in a good state to show by then.
 
No I understand inflation. Also look at the Wii.

The console space I feel is different than before with outside pressures. Plus they psychology of it all...

apparently you don't. this is the way inflation works.

everything was cheaper back in 1991, and people made less money on average. So spending $199 was *just as painful* as spending $351.00 today. "psychology" included. At some point inflation will hit the point where we're all paying $1000 for a console, and people will look back and say the PS3 launching at $599 was cheap, because consoles all cost $1000 now. NO.

As for the Wii, it's price is higher than it's specs would suggest, because nintendo decided to focus on an expensive tablet controller. No one really knows how much it's costing them, but another gaffer was charged $280 for a replacement, so that should be a hint.
 

Perkel

Banned
And the 4CUs for GPGPU would be equivalent to what level if it were a physX card?

Honestly i don't know. But i doubt psych x cards were amazing in hardware spec. Just dedicated hardware for only phys should be very big boost same as didicated hardware for audio is much better than build in.
 

Xpliskin

Member
Honestly, if Sony wants a huge edge, they'd need exclusives.

With MS being so much more resourceful than Sony, that's not gonna happen.

1st party Sony games will be amazing.

For the rest, it's going to be the lowest common denominator all over again.


Unless we got major batrayaltons by Japanese developers, somekind of a revolution.

I mean, how much better would a PS4-exclusive Final Fantasy be ?

Excite !
 
They're not being reserved.

They just have to be used more explicitly in your code. If I'm writing my rendering code, I make library calls, and the library and hardware take care of the rest. The GPU splits the work up per vertex or per group of fragments, or whatever, and schedules the threads and executes them.

These 4 CUs won't operate under that regime. They won't mix in 'automagically' to the work you do through the graphics libraries. You'll have to set up the work explicitly, separately, for those 4 CUs.

The work could be whatever you want that a CU can do - graphics or GPGPU. So they're not being 'reserved' per se, they're not being prescribed for any one particular use. However the motivation for splitting the CUs out of a hardware managed regime is so that if you want to do GPGPU, you don't have to leave the scheduling and context switching up to a hardware balancer that might not do things optimally when mixing graphics and compute tasks.

"I think"

I'm a little behind on my reading, so excuse my question if it has been asked.

How much more difficult does this make development? This sounds more labor intensive when you have to code for the individual cus.

(I know next to nothing about programming)
 
We don't know all GPU details from Durango hardware.

Why are people acting like if we know all Durango details?
What ever makes people sleep easier at night.

Seem like the clear winner of this mess right now is AMD. How did they sell Sony and MS on the same processor? Then have them go with completely different GPU setups?
AMD have multiple teams for the GPUs and cpu. The CPU is x86 so I think they can only do so much due to the way intel holds the rights to x86.

$249 in 2006 is about $280 today
I wouldn't really say the Wii won yet either. It has been pushed to release a year earlier. And it has won by a very small margin compared to the previous gens.

And the 4CUs for GPGPU would be equivalent to what level if it were a physX card?
Incomparable because physX is pretty broken. Probably a 650 or something if you really want to compare. With low level hardware access, they can do much more than physx.
 

FourMyle

Member

ibrg9mFPesxeDn.jpg
 

THE:MILKMAN

Member
which means delay, if that happens

Not gonna happen. Games have been worked on for 2 years plus. They will be finished by Nov and Sony can't afford to have finished games hanging around gathering dust or paying devs to twiddle their thumbs.

These Consoles could have been launched last autumn remember.
 
Star Wars 1313 looks current gen Uncharted in the Star Wars Universe (which is a huge complement). Watch Dogs however is far more impressive and doesn't look doable on the PS3.


1313 looks more next gen than watch dogs IMO, look at things like trees in watch dogs, if they can pull MGS: Ground Zeroes on current gen they can do watch dogs as well. The 1313 models look way too good to be doable on ps3/360
 

iceatcs

Junior Member
yeah, maybe it's the data move engines? it seems strange for a developer to say the difference is the same as that between the gamecube and xbox only to learn that sony potentially have a massive advantage.

something doesn't add up.

Well if GC vs xbox. That is quite different too. 8 Gflops vs 5.8 Gflops. 43MB vs 64MB
 

gofreak

GAF's Bob Woodward
I'm a little behind on my reading, so excuse my question if it has been asked.

How much more difficult does this make development? This sounds more labor intensive when you have to code for the individual cus.

(I know next to nothing about programming)

Well I'm imagining it'll be to some degree more like threading on CPUs than on GPUs, where on the latter it's transparently handled for you.

So yes, that's one of the tradeoffs - greater programmer burden to use those CUs effectively.

edit - actually, that could well be an incorrect assumption. There may still be hardware balancing, just independent of the other 14 CUs. But you would still have to address that group of CUs separately in one way or another, so that is 'more work' vs throwing everything through one interface.
 

RoboPlato

I'd be in the dick
Seem like the clear winner of this mess right now is AMD. How did they sell Sony and MS on the same processor? Then have them go with completely different GPU setups?

Sony couldn't use the processor they were originally aiming for so they went with one that would enable easier porting between the machines.
 

yon61

Member
The Orbis is sounding really good right now, but I seriously hope that Sony gets new first party franchises next generation because I hardly care for what they have now. LBP, Uncharted and Killzone do nothing for me.
 
apparently you don't. this is the way inflation works.

everything was cheaper back in 1991, and people made less money on average. So spending $199 was *just as painful* as spending $351.00 today. "psychology" included.

As for the Wii, it's price is higher than it's specs would suggest, because nintendo decided to focus on an expensive tablet controller. No one really knows how much it's costing them, but another gaffer was charged $280 for a replacement, so that should be a hint.

No I absolutely do. I know what the CPI is etc.

What I'm saying is that the external forces on people's discretionary income (that would be used to buy a console) are different than what they were before.

Also, when I said Wii, I was talking about the "Wii" not the "WiiU"
 

x3sphere

Member
Honestly, if Sony wants a huge edge, they'd need exclusives.

With MS being so much more resourceful than Sony, that's not gonna happen.

1st party Sony games will be amazing.

For the rest, it's going to be the lowest common denominator all over again.


Unless we got major batrayaltons by Japanese developers, somekind of a revolution.

I mean, how much better would a PS4-exclusive Final Fantasy be ?

Excite !

Exclusives on PS3 tend to interest me way more compared to 360, if Sony keeps it up for next-gen I'll be happy.
 

mr_nothin

Banned
I'm thinking that those 4CU's arent actually gimped, they'll just require a little more special care/handling if you want to use them for graphics rendering. I think that they're just equipped with specialized hardware to help them do GPGPU tasks better. The only "gimped" aspect about them is the extra care that would be needed to use them in more traditional ways.
 
No I absolutely do. I know what the CPI is etc.

What I'm saying is that the external forces on people's discretionary income (that would be used to buy a console) are different than what they were before.

Also, when I said Wii, I was talking about the "Wii" not the "WiiU"

Not really. "external forces on discretionary income" don't really change, unless you're talking recession specific pressures, and there were recessions in the late 80s and the 90s as well.

And if you were speaking of the Wii and not the WiiU, you'd know that nintendo built a significant profit margin into the hardware on that, whereas microsoft and sony do not. It's price is ALSO inflated.
 
Maybe the specs leaked for Durango are wrong?

haven't they been confirmed by a number of insiders?

Since when has a dev said it was xbox -> gc?

Ilherre said Ps3 - 360

one of thuway's sources. it's posted in the thread.

Well if GC vs xbox. That is quite different too. 8 Gflops vs 5.8 Gflops. 43MB vs 64MB

on paper maybe, but it wasn't noticeable in game visuals. resident evil 4, remake, star wars titles, etc.
 
No I understand inflation. Also look at the Wii.
I don't think you do. Your original post implied the nominal prices are what's important..
And then I brought up inflation and you said:

"$249 in 2006 is about $280 today"

So what is your point, anything higher than Wii launched at in 2006 is too expensive ?

I don't think so.

Wii-U cost $350 at launch and some people are whining about potentially paying $400 for a PS4 ?

Get out of here. Get a second job etc...
 

AgentP

Thinks mods influence posters politics. Promoted to QAnon Editor.
Well, Sony can announce some games but I think they still have a lot of current gens this year which means they might be a bit late for first party next gen games.

I fail to see your logic. Unless you are talking about teams that are working on current gen games now (Santa Monica, 1/2 of Naughty Dog, ???). There are plenty of 1st party teams who have been strangely silent for a year or two.
 
And the 4CUs for GPGPU would be equivalent to what level if it were a physX card?

Sorry this thread is moving too fast.
Yeah I'm not disregarding the GPUGPU cus, as I tried to explain earlier.
The 1.8 TF downclocked 10 percent cut 7970m rumor was already quite underwhelming, and that was under the assumption that the 'gpgpu' bits would be a bonus on top of that figure, not a part of it.

This news (if it is correct) just made an already underwhelming gpu a bit more dissapointing to me.

Going to say one last time where I'm coming from here:
Downclocked, cut version of 65W small die gpu that in it's uncut laptop form barely compares to an almost 1 year old now 150 euro mid range gpu (don't forget about the jaguar cores on the cpu side) in a console destined to not even be out for another 10-12 months?
All this combined with a basic understanding of the current state of the gpu market which is hugely dissapointing in it's own right.

That is a lot of layers of lowered expectations and dissapointment combined. Somehow if you seperate and isolate them they seem to become easier to accept for a lot of people.

This thing better be cheap.
 

Perkel

Banned
I'm thinking that those 4CU's arent actually gimped, they'll just require a little more special care/handling if you want to use them for graphics rendering. I think that they're just equipped with specialized hardware to help them do GPGPU tasks better. The only "gimped" aspect about them is the extra care that would be needed to use them in more traditional ways.

They probably won't be used for rendering. Physic and helping CPU will be their task. Mainly i think physic.
 

Grinchy

Banned
I'm so late to this but I'm glad to see Sony isn't going the "shit hardware for profits" route.

Now I'm really pumped to find out what the 720 will be. I feel like MS is going to try to go for Sony's jugular which could be great for us consumers. If MS goes crazy and doesn't put online gaming behind a pay wall, I would be very excited to buy one of their consoles again.
 
The 2006 video quality does not do this enough justice at all. This is my first time watching this, and it looks downright amazing. I would not mind if Polyphony favored graphics over gameplay, and left us with 30FPS. To me, racing games feel more realistic and cinematic that way.

It doesn't look that impressive anymore. GT5 looks better than that.
 

Xenon

Member
AMD have multiple teams for the GPUs and cpu. The CPU is x86 so I think they can only do so much due to the way intel holds the rights to x86.

It's just weird to go from completely different CPUs to standardized for next gen. I would assume MS and Sony would have been aware of this fact before the decided to use the chips.
 
The Orbis is sounding really good right now, but I seriously hope that Sony gets new first party franchises next generation because I hardly care for what they have now. LBP, Uncharted and Killzone do nothing for me.

I'm sure we will see some new franchises. TLoU is prob going to have a sequel on PS4. Hopefully they revive some older franchises like syphon filter, jak, dark cloud, Mark of the Kri, wild arms, jet moto, etc. Can't wait to see Killzone 4
 
Top Bottom