Napoleonthechimp
Member
Moffat has defended RTD many times so I very much doubt he hates his run on Doctor Who. The 10th and 11th chapter thing just comes off as a tongue-in-cheek joke.
Moffat has defended RTD many times so I very much doubt he hates his run on Doctor Who.
You joke, but I'm a bit soured on the whole thing at the moment. Some twat on a different forum made a veiled allusion towards Moffat being a child molester-in-waiting because he writes the Doctor interacting with kids, and I'll got zero inclination to let any of that bullshit here.
Okay bud, I think there's a slight difference between saying he might be trying to distance himself from RTD's era and calling him a paedo. I might be wrong, I'm not crazy.
I think that's the best analysis and idea regarding the show i've heard.I think for me, Moffat is everything I want in a writer and not really what I want in a show runner, and RTD is the opposite of that. A show ran by the both of them with duties split to individual's strengths would probably be incredible.
I'm sorry, I can't really agree with that one.
Episodes like The Doctor's Wife and The Girl Who Waited were harder sci-fi than Davies ever attempted, outside of maybe The Waters of Mars. As much as I love his era, Davies's series was pure comic-book, not sci-fi novel.
I think that's the best analysis and idea regarding the show i've heard.
I love Moffat, and it's probably because of his two-parters in the RTD era that i'm a fan of the show. The Eleventh Hour was incredible, but outside of that I have trouble identifying Moffat episodes on par with his previous work. That's understandable, he's got a lot of work. I don't think there's no denying he's a better writer than a producer. RTD is the opposite of course- his seasons came across as better mapped and planned.
Whoever the new showrunner is be it Gatiss, Chibnall, whenever that is, I still hope Moffat will still have an influence or a voice in that. Guest episodes again would be incredible.
I was more referring to Moffat the writer vs. Moffat the showrunner.
I'll take TGITF, Blink or The Empty Child over The Doctor's Wife any day of the week.
The only thing offensively bad about the Angels to me was the Statue or Liberty because it made no sense that it would be even able to move unnoticed and it ended up meaning literally nothing in the episode. Image of an angel & baby angels were cool and appropriately frightening concepts imo.
Not to mention that in the byzantium crash, all the angels were looking in the same direction, therefore except for the ones at the very back, all of them should've been locked because they were all looking at each other.
The biggest crime of Flesh and Stone was CGing an angel moving. In Blink the audience were a viewpoint alongside the characters.
The biggest crime of Flesh and Stone was CGing an angel moving. In Blink the audience were a viewpoint alongside the characters.
EXACTLY!!!
Not to mention that in the byzantium crash, all the angels were looking in the same direction, therefore except for the ones at the very back, all of them should've been locked because they were all looking at each other.
The ones at the back close their eyes, then the ones in front. All the way to the front who step forward. Seriously, peoples complaints about Moffat are so nit-picky, hes not perfect but its not worth getting worked up about the majority of the time.
Ah valid point actually. But it's not about nit picking really, this is the main characteristic of the Weeping Angels. You can't expect the have no one looking at the Statue of Liberty, a massive iconic statue which has guards around it, boats around it and especially after the whole 'an image of an angel becomes an angel' would mean that millions of postcards and videos should be terrorizing the world.
Excellent
Blink
The Girl in the Fireplace
The Time of Angels / Flesh & Stone
The Impossible Astronaut / Day of the Moon
The Pandorica Opens / The Big Bang
The Eleventh Hour
Asylum of the Daleks
Good
The Empty Child / The Doctor Dances
Silence in the Library / Forest of the Dead
A Good Man Goes To War
Let's Kill Hitler
A Christmas Carol
The Snowmen
The Angels Take Manhattan
The Bells of Saint John
Average
The Beast Below
The Wedding of River Song
The Doctor the Widow and the Wardrobe
I do so love how every Who thread ends up in a RTD/Moffat debate. It's like clockwork.
Even his worst episodes will have at least one interesting element or plot device in it though. He still hasn't written anything as bad as RTD's worst.
Like a 'best Final Fantasy' debate, it is the inevitable end of almost all new Who discussions. Like those debates, the truth is that each brings a different thing.
Guys I like Doctor Who
Like a 'best Final Fantasy' debate, it is the inevitable end of almost all new Who discussions. Like those debates, the truth is that each brings a different thing.
So... I finished the Davison era the other day. It wasn't bad, really.. it was just bland.
I've no problem with Davison as the Doctor, he just never really comes across as very Doctorish. None of the companions are likable, most of the stories are boring. Caves is the only thing that really stood out.
Just you wait until we start the Chibnall era!
God, if Gatiss or Chibnall take over I'm out. Whithouse I could tolerate.
The truth of FF is that everything after 6 is the wrong answer, I thought
Davison is one of my favourites. He doesn't have the same energy as some of the other Doctor's but I recall enjoying a lot of the stories.
Guys I like Doctor Who
*looks up the episodes Chibnall wrote*
Ewwwwwwwwww
*looks up the episodes Chibnall wrote*
Ewwwwwwwwww
*looks up the episodes Chibnall wrote*
Ewwwwwwwwww
42 was good.
42 was good.
42 was good.