Yes, but he was talking about them being delayed.
Better delayed and perfected than released glitchy to hell, requiring several huge patches and then DLC to complete the narrative.
Yes, but he was talking about them being delayed.
No...he's President and COO of Nintendo of America, an NCL subsidiary.
Better delayed and perfected than released glitchy to hell, requiring several huge patches and then DLC to complete the narrative.
Nintendo was too confident when they released WiiU and now the bad marketing bites them in the ass. Also the lack of 1st party games - since that's all the system has. Kinda sad to hear. Fortunately the 3DS seems to be doing really well and that's the system where my interest is focused as well.
As much as I like Nintendo, I think this is good. They need a major shake up to get them rolling. They have become complacent due to the success of the Wii and it's about time their ego took a hit. Bring out the big guns for the Wii U and amaze us like you have always done, Nintendo.
Oh duh..I was in the middle of writing a post on Iwata and I misread the post and thought that was in reference to him.
Snark backfire. ;___;
But, yeah, I actually agree. We don't know how much of Reggie's incompetence is due to him, or due to Iwata's castrating of NOA in general. His hands seemed to be pretty tied when it comes to anything other choosing which games to localize.
(I personally believe that Reggie initially chose not to localize Xenoblade just to remind himself he still has some power within the company. lol)
People said the same about the 3DS two years back, and now look at it
Lets put this into perspective.
This is a lot of money lost. No way to slice that positively.
Lets look at it this way. Square Enix loss less money then this (~5 billion yen less) this last fiscal year. They called it extraordinary losses in their report and it forced the CEO of the company out.
Now lets also realize that Nintendo has been losing money for two strait years now. This does not bode well for Nintendo or Iwata. If the doesn't massively turn the ship around this next fiscal year and return with big profits then it will be "game over" for him.
Of course. The marketing for 3DS was bad and there were no games. They improved the marketing in my opinion and also the game started coming. Boom! Success!
Reggie handles more of the day-to-day operations of licensing, North American distribution, and North American marketing. Yeah he's the defacto spokesperson for Nintendo at North American trade events, but that doesn't necessarily mean all that much.
Iwata is the guy who defines Nintendo's long-term strategies, maintains relationships with key Nintendo partners, and finalizes the fundamentals of the product. In other words, he's the rubber stamp that approves everything. He is the face of Nintendo.
Reggie's just a puppet with localized, nuts-and-bolts-related autonomy.
Two totally different size companies. SE has been dealing with serious managerial issues for years now. It wasnt one year of losses that got him booted out, it was half a decade of poor directionLets put this into perspective.
This is a lot of money lost. No way to slice that positively.
Lets look at it this way. Square Enix loss less money then this (~5 billion yen less) this last fiscal year. They called it extraordinary losses in their report and it forced the CEO of the company out.
Now lets also realize that Nintendo has been losing money for two strait years now. This does not bode well for Nintendo or Iwata. If he doesn't massively turn the ship around this next fiscal year and return with big profits then it will be "game over" for him.
Square-Enix are a software company only
Nintendo deal with hardware development and release which costs a lot more money.
Apples & Oranges
If next year things show no sign of turning around for the Wii U, then I will understand calling for Iwata's head and/or major change in Nintendo. However, people are so reluctant to give Nintendo a chance. They have been calling for Iwata's head ever since the 3DS stumbled out the gate. Now it's doing brilliantly, and people are still calling for his head
Two totally different size companies. SE has been dealing with serious managerial issues for years now. It wasnt one year of losses that got him booted out, it was half a decade of poor direction
They don't need a major shake up, specifically Iwata being removed, to sort it out. All that'd cause is turmoil in the company, possibly even more losses should the new head decide to start canning projects and there would be no sign of anything changing on the consumer side for at least two years.
Two totally different size companies. SE has been dealing with serious managerial issues for years now. It wasnt one year of losses that got him booted out, it was half a decade of poor direction
Wow, didn't realize GAF hated Iwata so much.
I don't think he can wave a wand and magically make games appear any faster, do you?
No, but absolving him of responsibility for games not being ready sooner is ludicrous. He's the top man. He's ultimately responsible when internal development teams struggle and can't get games out the door in a reasonable fashion. Why did this process take over two years? Understand, this is going to be the third E3 that the Wii U has been shown at, and the retail market at the time of E3 for Wii U will consist of two first-party games. TWO. NintendoLand (which was a pack-in for some) and NSMBU. That's it. Game & Wario hits after E3, then Pikmin well after that.
Iwata can't make games magically appear, but a strong leader drives his teams to get products to market instead of begging for patience. Perhaps other people below Iwata should be fired for this incompetence, but the questions start with Iwata. He needed to ensure that these games were done before throwing Wii U out there because he had no other choice. He didn't do that.
SE reported a profit last (read 2011) FY ending March 2012.
http://venturebeat.com/2012/05/14/square-enix-reports-fiscal-year-profit-thanks-to-a-couple-of-big-hits/
While I don't disagree with the fact that they had serious managerial issues for years now they had been profiting up until this last FY (March 2012 - March 2013) and FY 2010. Those are really the only low points in the last 10-ish years.
Nintendo has been dealing with serious managerial issues for years now.
Nintendo's troubles didn't start with the 3DS. They started when the Wii was practically abandoned years ago. They started when Nintendo failed to lay the groundwork for important online services even further back.
Peeling away the bandage that was the Wii and original DS, the managerial issues that are having a visible effect on Nintendo's bottom line now have been present for years.
Billions of yen lost is still billions of yen lost. Stockholders won't be happy. People who run the budgets for the company won't be happy. They aren't bringing in what they are putting out. That's bad. Bad, bad, bad.
Now, is 13 billion/18 billion yen a lot more to SE then Nintendo? Absolutely, but come on dude. Billions of yen lost is not good. Just because Nintendo CAN take a bigger hit doesn't mean they SHOULD take the hit. This is bad and if I was in any high position or a large stockholder, I would not be very thrilled about this news. I would be calling for blood.
I don't understand how people could defend Iwata at this point. We're going to get another quote to add to the list tomorrow, aren't we?
You could literally say this about ANY bad CEO on the brink of being fired. Sure things could get potentially worse after he leaves. That's always a possibility. That doesn't mean you keep the guy who's doing a shitty job forever. You sack him and hope for the best going forward.
sorry if already asked but I'm at work and it's hard for me to recover all those pages: how is this loss compared to the previous one?
Thanks GAF
Lego City Undercover doesn't count because reasons.
Except for the fact that FF XIV nearly bankrupted them, DQ X flopped and Final Fantasy is a tarnished brand at this point thanks to XIII and XIII-2 as well as Versus being a no-show the entire console generation.
SE is not in good shape right now.
Less than half.sorry if already asked but I'm at work and it's hard for me to recover all those pages: how is this loss compared to the previous one?
Thanks GAF
Lego City Undercover doesn't count because reasons.
They published it. Okay. Doesn't explain what Nintendo's internal development teams were doing. LEGO was developed by Traveller's Tales. So-- first-party yes, if only because Nintendo published/funded it. Still doesn't account for confusion/ineptitude at the first-party studio level.
Except for the fact that FF XIV nearly bankrupted them, DQ X flopped and Final Fantasy is a tarnished brand at this point thanks to XIII and XIII-2 as well as Versus being a no-show the entire console generation.
SE is not in good shape right now.
Why does it matter that your magic Wii U, in your magic town where all your friends are trading in their 360s to get Wii Us because of how wonderfully magically revolutionary it is, has never encountered problems that were and/or still are widespread with the Wii U's launch? That doesn't stop them from being widespread issues.My Wii U has only frozen twice, once in NFS and once in Lego City. I have never experienced these hardlock problems people have.
Day one updates are quite common these days, and you will see MS and Sony will provide the same. Don't be deluded enough to think otherwise.
I also don't get the speed issue. Mine never runs as slow as some other's
Which is why upon positive reaction he decided to gouge up the price on the 3DS...He is one of the only CEOs that doesn't want to sap as much money as possible from the consumer.
They published it. Okay. Doesn't explain what Nintendo's internal development teams were doing. LEGO was developed by Traveller's Tales. So-- first-party yes, if only because Nintendo published/funded it. Still doesn't account for confusion/ineptitude at the first-party studio level.
Of course. The marketing for 3DS was bad and there were no games. They improved the marketing in my opinion and also the game started coming. Boom! Success!
Reggie handles more of the day-to-day operations of licensing, North American distribution, and North American marketing. Yeah he's the defacto spokesperson for Nintendo at North American trade events, but that doesn't necessarily mean all that much.
Iwata is the guy who defines Nintendo's long-term strategies, maintains relationships with key Nintendo partners, and finalizes the fundamentals of the product. In other words, he's the rubber stamp that approves everything. He is the face of Nintendo.
Reggie's just a puppet with localized, nuts-and-bolts-related autonomy.
I defend Iwata because I have faith in him turning it around. He is one of the only CEOs that doesn't want to sap as much money as possible from the consumer. He doesn't want subscription models for the console. He doesn't want his company's games to have pointless DLC.
It's the same version of the same OS running on the same hardware. That it's slow is readily apparent, that it's noticeable ymmv. The same hardware with the same firmware updates.And you're basing your "It's widespread" claim on anecdotal evidence.
You're right. They're not.
But they still reported a profit last FY.
Really puts things into perspective. Even though Square-Enix was profitable until only recently, they were still aware of the damage done to their legacy brands, and ousted Wada as a result.
Meanwhile, people want Iwata to stick around despite Iwata doing the same to Nintendo, only with consecutive loses. Huge consecutive losses.
This thread...
Wada also presided over the biggest profits Square has ever posted. In fact, Wada was at least smart enough to know that the only way to make the company more relevant was to buy western studios and form SE studios in the west. Iwata has failed to even see the need for this.Only Iwata also presided over their huge successes with DS and Wii thus at least deserves to get some credit and a chance to turn it over.
Wada on the other hand lead S-E all the way into what they are now.
Why are people always so quick to forget about Nintendo's lesser-known titles?
So far, Nintendo has funded LEGO City Undercover, Nintendo Land, New Super Mario Bros. U, SiNG Party, and Nintendo x Joysound Wii Karaoke U.
They've also established distribution deals with Capcom for Monster Hunter 3 Ultimate, Tecmo Koei with Ninja Gaiden 3: Razor's Edge, among others.
Nintendo's "internal development teams" have been split between 3DS and Wii U titles. There's only so much they can work on at a time. That's why Nintendo has been outsourcing development of 1st-party titles to studios like Platinum Games.
This thread...
Just wow. Straight up, trolling, deathwishes for Iwata (Posting a seppuku drawing is just that, don't try to defend it. It can't mean anything else), gifs calling him a Bitch.
smh.
Theres nothing to defend. Seriously. Im not talking about the news here. This is about GAF not being able to have a fruitful discussion about ANYTHING Nintendo. If people are willing to go this far just to shit on a company then its not even worth for me to start. If i need future proof that GAF is not a board for Nintendo fans, i just need to link to this thread.
This topic is worth having a thread and a discussion. Good and bad news are worthy of a discussion. But not like this!
Ironically if theres good news, all those people jumping happily into every bad news Nintendo thread are MIA. Oh gee what a surprise. Good Nintendo news rarely reach 3 pages on GAF (50ppp). Cant give credit when they do good stuff (example: The last Nintendo Direct).
Too bad a discussion cannot be had about Nintendo on NeoGAF.
Im 28 years old now. Im too old for this behavior and certanly won't drop to such a sameful level. Its just Videogames people.
Oh, good god. Not only are you being ridiculously histrionic about the seppuku drawing, but you're actually taking the (frankly, hilarious) Pocahontas gif as "Calling Iwata a bitch."deathwishes for Iwata (Posting a seppuku drawing is just that, don't try to defend it. It can't mean anything else), gifs calling him a Bitch.
It's sounding like the only discussion you want to have regarding Nintendo is rainbows and butterflies.
Oh, good god. Not only are you being ridiculously histrionic about the seppuku drawing, but you're actually taking the (frankly, hilarious) Pocahontas gif as "Calling Iwata a bitch."
If you're 28, you're old enough to get over the victim-complex.
Only Iwata also presided over their huge successes with DS and Wii thus at least deserves to get some credit and a chance to turn it over.
Wada on the other hand lead S-E all the way into what they are now.
And you're basing your "It's widespread" claim on anecdotal evidence.
I think you're confused, though. Not releasing games is not the same as being inept. Is Kamiya's team 'inept' too? Or did they need more time to finish? Wii Fit U was rated back in January by the Australian classification board, it's done, but releasing it now is suicide. Wario is done, it's just being localised, probably held off a while to separate it from Nintendo Land a little. Pikmin got people bitching about the graphics and that seems to be the biggest thing they've worked on (or the lighting engine at least). Nintendo delayed two 'internal' games and suddenly they're inept.
EDIT: I forgot about stuff like Sing Party & Wii Street U.
You gave me a big hearty laugh with that one. Iwata's the worst.
Wii U:
Pikmin 3
Game & Wario (EU/US)
The Wonderful 101
Bayonetta 2
New Super Luigi (DLC)
Pokemon Rumble U (eshop)
Panorama View (eshop)
3D Mario
Mario Kart 8
SMT X FE
Monolith Soft's X
Yarn Yoshi
LoZ: WWHD
Wii Fit U
Wii Party U
Smash Bros. 4
Lego City Undercover (JP)
Rayman Legends (JP)
Bold are confirmed for FY2013. Studios like IntSys, Retro, & HAL all have no games announced. I'm pretty sure all of SDP 3's games (the team that handles liason with Western devs) are released, which means there must be unknown projects. If the Wii and DS had had a year like this, no one would be questioning anything.
How is he the worst? Is he putting games out requiring DLC? Requiring microtransactions for basic things?
Do tell
Is this your first time on GAF? Your personal affections are coloring your perspective, there are plenty of long bad news threads about all the companies, when there's bad news to be had.I just refuse to deal with people using every chance to post nonsense like that image. Or happily celebrating a company doing bad.