• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Capcom: "We've got no plans for PS Vita Monster Hunter at the moment"

megalowho

Member
By many accounts on the internet and from folks I know, the 3DS version of Monster Hunter 3 is a less than ideal way to play the game, especially for newcomers. Vita's hardware seems better suited for the experience, but not gonna hold my breath at this point. It'll likely be console or nothing for me if I ever attempt to get into MH, despite it being something I'd rather have on the go.
 

solarus

Member
It blows my mind that sony didn't manage to secure MH for vita. It just gives the impression that they don't care or underestimated it's importance in japan.
 
By many accounts on the internet and from folks I know, the 3DS version of Monster Hunter 3 is a less than ideal way to play the game, especially for newcomers. Vita's hardware seems better suited for the experience, but not gonna hold my breath at this point. It'll likely be console or nothing for me if I ever attempt to get into MH, despite it being something I'd rather have on the go.

That's BS, the 3DS or WiiU monster hunters are probably the best to start playing the series. The target switch perfectly makes a second stick unnecessary.
 

SmokyDave

Member
That's BS, the 3DS or WiiU monster hunters are probably the best to start playing the series. The target switch perfectly makes a second stick unnecessary.
If the developers felt differently I'm sure they'd have pushed for a second stick attachment or something, so you must be right.
 

Alexios

Cores, shaders and BIOS oh my!
If the developers felt differently I'm sure they'd have pushed for a second stick attachment or something, so you must be right.
Right, while the PSP was ideal without even having that function or a virtual touch canera pad so that's why it never got such an attachment.

Troll harder.
 
If the developers felt differently I'm sure they'd have pushed for a second stick attachment or something, so you must be right.

Well the option is there for people that can't get used to the target I guess, but that doesn't mean the game isn't perfectly playable without the CCP.
 

megalowho

Member
That's BS, the 3DS or WiiU monster hunters are probably the best to start playing the series. The target switch perfectly makes a second stick unnecessary.
Everyone I've heard says play WiiU >>> 3DS. Online play would be key for me. I don't have a WiiU right now, though.
 

SmokyDave

Member
Right, while the PSP was ideal without even having that function or a virtual touch canera pad so that's why it never got such an attachment.
The PSP wasn't ideal either, everyone wanted to see a second stick on the successor.

Troll harder.
Ugh, infantile.

Well the option is there for people that can't get used to the target I guess, but that doesn't mean the game isn't perfectly playable without the CCP.
Sure, I'm not suggesting it isn't perfectly playable, I'm just saying it would be better with a second stick.
 

Alexios

Cores, shaders and BIOS oh my!
The PSP wasn't ideal either
No shit. Hence getting or not getting an attachment isn't any kind of proof as you wanted to suggest with what you thought was a witty comment.

There are arguments to be made, you however made no good ones in that post. Just trolled.

Ugh, infantile.
Yes, you seem to be.
 

Alexios

Cores, shaders and BIOS oh my!
I honestly can't do the '3D games don't need a second stick' dance again.
I didn't ask you to, I just commented on your trolling without stating my opinion on the matter.

Though pointing out the PSP wasn't ideal despite not having an attachment certainly hints the opposite of the straw man you're trying to pull here.

You could have made a valid argument but failed to do so just to post what you thought was witty remark and that's all I pointed out at the time, not if a second stick would or wouldn't be good to have.

Did you just drop 'I know you are, so what am I?'

Why yes, yes you did.
So? Did you just throw insults out of nowhere just because I called out your trolling? Why yes you did. So your insults certainly deserve getting thrown back to you.

Everyone I've heard says play WiiU >>> 3DS. Online play would be key for me. I don't have a WiiU right now, though.
That's Western gamers saying it, because we don't play local multiplayer on handhelds socially as much so the lack of online on 3DS really hurts it. Of course we also like HD, big TVs and twin sticks. But the 3DS version isn't bad either. People, myself included, did play the series on PSP and it's certainly way better on 3DS with the added control features and touch screen camera control, even if that's not as good as a second stick. MonHun4 will have less of these issues too since it will have native online on 3DS, but I'm sure that in the West the home console version will be preferred still. It would likely be the preferred version even if the handheld version was on Vita even though that does have a second stick. In Japan it's the opposite as the second stick clearly isn't as important as the portability to them, that's why it exploded on PSP and not PS2.
 

Fewr

Member
By many accounts on the internet and from folks I know, the 3DS version of Monster Hunter 3 is a less than ideal way to play the game, especially for newcomers. Vita's hardware seems better suited for the experience, but not gonna hold my breath at this point. It'll likely be console or nothing for me if I ever attempt to get into MH, despite it being something I'd rather have on the go.
I'm a newcomer to the series, and I've done 110+hrs on the original 3ds (no cpp), so have plenty of people in the OT. My experience does not reflect what you say here at all.

The game is better suited for portables than consoles (I also own the WiiU version), but if console is a requirement for you, from what I've seen 3U seems the best place for neophytes to start.
 

ArtHands

Thinks buying more servers can fix a bad patch
For me they're simply taking the franchise as an hostage, Sony shown a Vita retail pamphlet including MHP3 and other stuff that got release and not, but I'm sure they wouldn't list such a big shot without any confirmation from Capcom, hell they could've been sued for using their logo and such.

They surely have a rought build of MHP3 working on Vita, but didn't let any of their team to work on it because they want money, and so far Vita=/=money.

But frankly, I thank them for letting other franchise take their place on this console (Soul Sacrifice, Toukiden)

You mean that scan of various titles that surfaced at the beginning of last year?

Was the scan real in the first place, or did it just appeared on the internet one day? Who else has saw it in real life back then? Honest questions.
 

SmokyDave

Member
I didn't ask you to, I just commented on your trolling without stating my opinion on the matter.

Though pointing out the PSP wasn't ideal despite not having an attachment certainly hints the opposite of the straw man you're trying to pull here.

You could have made a valid argument but failed to do so just to post what you thought was witty remark and that's all I pointed out at the time, not if a second stick would or wouldn't be good to have.

So? Did you just throw insults out of nowhere just because I called out your trolling? Why yes you did. So your insults certainly deserve getting thrown back to you.
You're so fucking uptight it's unreal.
 

Alexios

Cores, shaders and BIOS oh my!
You're so fucking uptight it's unreal.
I'm just posting my opinions on a forum, in a thread I happened to be active in at this time, you're the one getting riled up enough to start throwing personal insults and f bombs.

Sorry to have offended you so much, it's just what I think, not a big deal, I'm just a random guy on the internet :)
 

Fewr

Member
Until you go underwater, or fight duals. You can't help but notice how terrible onscreen camera control is next to CPP.
I've done both of those, and haven't had any more problems than when using wii u's second stick. I've gotten used to the virtual dpad.
 

Alexios

Cores, shaders and BIOS oh my!
I've done both of those, and haven't had any more problems than when using wii u's second stick. I've gotten used to the virtual dpad.
I can believe that, my preferred control method on Wii was the remote + nunchuck even though I have a Clsssic Controller and even though my first experience with the series was on PSP. That means my camera control was on a d-pad rather than an analog stick but it never felt like I was struggling against the controls, just the monsters. I preferred for the comfort factor and tilt shortcuts.

However I think they've said 4 is going to have free camera (meaning full analog control even though it doesn't have underwater parts, in previous games camera control was all digital even when using an analog stick, possibly with the exception of the underwater bits in Tri, I forget) so that could indeed be significantly better on an analog stick. Then again, they might make the touchpad optionally analog too for the 3DS.
 
It would be pretty great if they ported Monster Hunter to a system with a second stick.

I imagine for a lot of people would put down a significant amount of money for that opportunity.
 

SmokyDave

Member
It would be pretty great if they ported Monster Hunter to a system with a second stick.

I imagine for a lot of people would put down a significant amount of money for that opportunity.
I sincerely doubt that. For most people, 'good enough' is good enough. See smartphone gaming for an example.
 

Alexios

Cores, shaders and BIOS oh my!
He was being funny, since every MonHun has been ported from/to a system with a 2nd stick, the latest included.
 

SmokyDave

Member
You don't even like MH, why caring about the topic of the thread? :p
Losing Monster Hunter effectively killed the Vita (or certainly took away its safety net). Whether I like the title or not, it's been pivotal in the development of the handheld market this generation.

I also find it interesting that speculation continues, even though its obvious that the 3DS is the far better platform sales-wise and Capcom don't seem to want to support the Vita in any capacity whatsoever. I honestly can't imagine what on earth is sowing the seeds of hope.
 
Losing Monster Hunter effectively killed the Vita (or certainly took away its safety net). Whether I like the title or not, it's been pivotal in the development of the handheld market this generation.

I also find it interesting that speculation continues, even though its obvious that the 3DS is the far better platform sales-wise and Capcom don't seem to want to support the Vita in any capacity whatsoever. I honestly can't imagine what on earth is sowing the seeds of hope.

Even if MH had shown up, the platform would still be fucked in the west, and 3rd parties are already hesitant in going on the 3ds for mediocre western sales. The truth is that the PSP was mainly supported because the DS was far too weak to accomodate many styles of games.Overall, PSP's software sales were not great for a platform that sold 20 million units. By the way Shocking Alberto was being sarcastic because Wii U has 2 sticks
 

Anteo

Member
Losing Monster Hunter effectively killed the Vita (or certainly took away its safety net). Whether I like the title or not, it's been pivotal in the development of the handheld market this generation.

I also find it interesting that speculation continues, even though its obvious that the 3DS is the far better platform sales-wise and Capcom don't seem to want to support the Vita in any capacity whatsoever. I honestly can't imagine what on earth is sowing the seeds of hope.

Fanboy love of course, it always happens. Same reason we see threads about if/how the WiiU will recover.

Even if MH had shown up, the platform would still be fucked in the west, and 3rd parties are already hesitant in going on the 3ds for mediocre western sales. The truth is that the PSP was mainly supported because the DS was far too weak to accomodate many styles of games.Overall, PSP's software sales were not great for a platform that sold 20 million units. By the way Shocking Alberto was being sarcastic because Wii U has 2 sticks

With MH on it, I bet we would see more east support for the platform, and maybe some of those games would come to the west. So at least that's something. Some extra games will always help.
 

MrT-Tar

Member
It would be pretty great if they ported Monster Hunter to a system with a second stick.

I imagine for a lot of people would put down a significant amount of money for that opportunity.

The WiiU's continued shit sales suggests otherwise.

I hope MH4 is ported to the WiiU as well.
I own both a 3DS and a WiiU and love both, so please don't get me for port-begging
 

SmokyDave

Member
Even if MH had shown up, the platform would still be fucked in the west, and 3rd parties are already hesitant in going on the 3ds for mediocre western sales. The truth is that the PSP was mainly supported because the DS was far too weak to accomodate many styles of games.
Indeed, it's not the only factor that has seen the Vita struggle. It's the single largest in my opinion though. It would've been the platform that you had to buy for MH whether you liked it or not, and many would have. Losing MH meant that the 3DS exclusively has literally every handheld franchise that anyone anywhere cares about*.

*from a system seller perspective.
By the way Shocking Alberto was being sarcastic because Wii U has 2 sticks
Don't tell anyone, but it's entirely possible I recognised the sarcasm.

Fanboy love of course, it always happens. Same reason we see threads about if/how the WiiU will recover.
It has to be more than that. If you look up 'Vita Fanboy' in a dictionary, it's just a picture of my avatar. That shouldn't make you blind to market realities though.
 
Also the truth is that while PS Vita fans need to stop whining like babies about not getting game that is not coming, other people need to stop whining about how there is no reason to not want the game on system like the 3DS. However, there is a fine line between that and port begging.

Don't tell anyone, but it's entirely possible I recognised the sarcasm.

True, but you responded seriously to his post which threw me off.
 
Losing Monster Hunter effectively killed the Vita (or certainly took away its safety net). Whether I like the title or not, it's been pivotal in the development of the handheld market this generation.

I also find it interesting that speculation continues, even though its obvious that the 3DS is the far better platform sales-wise and Capcom don't seem to want to support the Vita in any capacity whatsoever. I honestly can't imagine what on earth is sowing the seeds of hope.

It seems Vita owners substituted MH with SS, so why bothering?

Anyway, rumors about DQIX coming on PSP at the time were on par with MH on Vita. Did you see DQIX somewhere else?
 

njean777

Member
I dont know why capcom just doesn't release it on both hand helds at this point. Then they can see which one it does better on. Of course there would be significant differences between the two. Also Vita has SS so no big deal really.
 
I dont know why capcom just doesn't release it on both hand helds at this point. Then they can see which one it does better on. Of course there would be significant differences between the two.

Because MH is built around local multiplayer in Japan. Splitting the userbase is one of the worst ideas in this case.
 

Ridley327

Member
It seems Vita owners substituted MH with SS, so why bothering?

Anyway, rumors about DQIX coming on PSP at the time were on par with MH on Vita. Did you see DQIX somewhere else?

I think the big question about Soul Sacrifice is if it's something that appeals to just Vita owners or if it has broader appeal. The big thing about MonHun was that it got a lot of people to buy PSPs just to play it, and the jury is certainly still out of SS can do the same thing.

For my money, though, I would point to God Eater 2 being much more capable than SS to be that very popular hunting action game in the Vita's arsenal, since it targets a much wider range of players, rather than the decidedly more adult-oriented SS.
 

NEO0MJ

Member
It seems Vita owners substituted MH with SS, so why bothering?

I'm amazed by the amount of people acting like SS is a good replacement for MH. The game barely sold at all, and plays very differently. Sure you hunt monster with other people but that isn't enough for it to take MH's place. You guys did see the game's current sales, right?

I dont know why capcom just doesn't release it on both hand helds at this point. Then they can see which one it does better on. Of course there would be significant differences between the two. Also Vita has SS so no big deal really.

Like a lot already mentioned, they don't want to fragment the game's playerbase.
 

VanWinkle

Member
It seems Vita owners substituted MH with SS, so why bothering?

Anyway, rumors about DQIX coming on PSP at the time were on par with MH on Vita. Did you see DQIX somewhere else?

You can believe one game is better while recognizing that it won't have the same mass market appeal and sales. They two don't have to relate to each other, but I'm not surprised by your comment.
 
Top Bottom