MidgarBlowedUp
Member
Last time I checked my desktop gaming PC didn't run on 8gb of GDDR5.
If you're going to include the price of PS+ for the whole gen, you should include the value add from a whole gen of PS+ games as well. It would be quite a lot.
People comparing it to laptops are being silly, laptops don't have internal power supplies. Many of them also don't even have optical drives. You pull those two things out and they could have made it half as thick. Considering the price point, the fact that it will probably be pretty quiet, and that it's going to be manufactured by the millions, they did a pretty amazing job. Especially compared to the XBox One which is huge for no reason at all.
People comparing it to laptops are being silly, laptops don't have internal power supplies. Many of them also don't even have optical drives. You pull those two things out and they could have made it half as thick. Considering the price point, the fact that it will probably be pretty quiet, and that it's going to be manufactured by the millions, they did a pretty amazing job. Especially compared to the XBox One which is huge for no reason at all.
Last time I checked my desktop gaming PC didn't run on 8gb of GDDR5.
If you're going to include the price of PS+ for the whole gen, you should include the value add from a whole gen of PS+ games as well. It would be quite a lot.
You show me a $400 laptop, and I'll show you a laptop that is designed to break in 3 years.
A mid range 2012 GPU and a netbook CPU is an engineering marvel? Must be nice to be so easily impressed.
I don't think that's the best argument given how unreliable consoles generally are
What value ad, an undetermined grab bag of games that you might or might not want and that will get added 6 months to a year after release (by then say a steam sale has said games up for 5-10 euros)
That is assuming the current model of including games in the ps+ sub continues, which so far it won't since driveclub will not be the full version (missing the tracks and cars, so a big demo at worst, gt5 prologue at best)
Then you take into account that you pay 20+ euros more per game on the ps4 and it really doesn't go into favor of ps4 anymore price wise, I didn't even want to go there because you have to make a lot of assumptions of ps+ games continuing to be added as they are now and then it still doesn't look favorable.
I think consoles have a history of long lifespans, outside of a few exceptions.
Console lifespan went downhill when they added optical drives. No chance of the lifespans of old until they lose optical drives.
You show me a $400 laptop, and I'll show you a laptop that is designed to break in 3 years.
ps+ is no longer optional it's mandatory of course you have to add it in to the cost now...This is a hardware thread. IF you're going to randomly throw in the entire cost of PS+ when talking about how much it costs, you might as well mention the fact that you get a ton of games from it too. I've had it for only a year, and I have 40+ games from it (not counting Vita). Imagine that for the entire gen.
Console lifespan went downhill when they added optical drives. No chance of the lifespans of old until they lose optical drives.
Last time I checked my desktop gaming PC didn't run on 8gb of GDDR5.
Are we really having PC vs PS4 discussions in here? Lord.
I blame the people who are really upset about other people being impressed.
Like you could ever get close to building a PC with these specs at the same size and slimness. The power supply alone would take a massive chunk of the space, as would the GPU.
A mid range 2012 GPU and a netbook CPU is an engineering marvel? Must be nice to be so easily impressed.
Its pretty small and seems to have some crazy things going on. I want to get one this year but I am a little hesitant on buying one just because of potential hardware failures. Sony are normally good at this but I got burned on a 60 gig ps3 and I guess it wouldn't hurt to wait a few months just in case right?
I tried...and failed, lol
$454.90
I was at $405 before the blu-ray drive.
This was in a mATX/ITX case that was 1 inch shallower, but 3 inches wider than the PS4 stats given. So..slightly bigger...but I still failed price wise. Granted, price doesn't matter to me on my gaming PC, but I suppose I can echo your statement after trying.
I know it's an ironic pic but I'd love a display there, to show notifications, online friends or other stuff
I think consoles have a history of long lifespans, outside of a few exceptions.
Its pretty small and seems to have some crazy things going on. I want to get one this year but I am a little hesitant on buying one just because of potential hardware failures. Sony are normally good at this but I got burned on a 60 gig ps3 and I guess it wouldn't hurt to wait a few months just in case right?
A mid range 2012 GPU and a netbook CPU is an engineering marvel? Must be nice to be so easily impressed.
Just like PS4!ITT: Some PC gamers who are going to be sorely disappointed when their 'superior than PS4' laptop can only run next-gen games on low settings.
Are we really having PC vs PS4 discussions in here? Lord.
I tried...and failed, lol
$454.90
I was at $405 before the blu-ray drive.
This was in a mATX/ITX case that was 1 inch shallower, but 3 inches wider than the PS4 stats given. So..slightly bigger...but I still failed price wise. Granted, price doesn't matter to me on my gaming PC, but I suppose I can echo your statement after trying.
Last time i checked a gaming PC doesn't need 8gb of gddr5 to produce better looking games then what next gen console showed this E3?
A mid range 2012 GPU and a netbook CPU is an engineering marvel? Must be nice to be so easily impressed.
The latest numbers we’ve seen have a 5.9W quad-core Temash outperforms a 17W Core i-3 Sandy Bridge in Cinebench R11.5, a benchmark usually very favorable to Intel’s single-threaded performance at 1.4GHz for both CPU’s. Temash did this at one-third the power draw with a chip 30% smaller. Frankly, this is close to disruptive chip technology as it is capable of bringing x86 power and compatibility realistically into the range of mobile and ultra-mobile devices like smartphones.
I'm a PC gamer too, but I damn love consoles.
Probably "pure" PC gamers sometimes have behavior problems and need to show how much bigger is their.... PC.
Seriously, I used to read some PC games forum and in the end they also hate each other because there are Nvidia fanboy, Amd fanboy, Intel fanboy, etc etc
It's pretty sad, just leave them alone, it's the better choice.
Last time i checked a gaming PC doesn't need 8gb of gddr5 to produce better looking games then what next gen console showed this E3?
End of life PS4 games will probably look as good as GPUs that cost $300 today. You can't beat that kind of value with a PC. Not to mention all the great exclusive games.
End of life PS4 games will probably look as good as GPUs that cost $300-400 today. You can't beat that kind of value with a PC. Not to mention all the great exclusive games.
Really? The only manufacturer (that is still around) I can say that of, based off experience is Nintendo.
End of life PS4 games will probably look as good as GPUs that cost $300 today. You can't beat that kind of value with a PC. Not to mention all the great exclusive games.