• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

handytips.info Rumor: Microsoft to 'reintroduce' Xbox1 @ event/may lower price to 399

Status
Not open for further replies.

Loonz

Member
Well, if they finally sell the thing with kinect at 399€ here, and given that you have to pay for online play in both next-gen Sony and MS consoles, I might as well jump ship from PS3 to Xbone. I actually prefer a bit more Xbone's exclusives announced until now so...
 

Ryan_IGN

Member
They don't even cite ANY source, let alone an "anonymous" or "inside" source.

Their only "source" refers to internal meetings after E3, which is a "no shit, Sherlock" statement given that they've already made the major policy changes.
 

Alebrije

Member
Does MS can sell the XBONE with a loss for long time ? Yes it can.

Does MS cares about the game industry ? No , 360, Xbone are just merely troyan horses, the living room OS agenda is their goal

It is good for us (consumers) ? in someways yes at this moment but if MS manages to rule the industry what we saw at E3 and previusly will pale compared with what they will do.

So the best for us is to have the 3 companies healty ( Sony , Nintendo , MS ). If this rumor is confirmed it will help MS to compete againts Sony , that is good.
 

Sean

Banned
I don't see MS dropping the price for a while. The fact that they were going along with the whole "always online" DRM thing shows they don't really care about marketshare or selling the most consoles, they seem more concerned with profits.

They'll most likely sell out of whatever limited launch supply they have at $500, then they can drop the price (or release a non-Kinect SKU for $399) a few months later if necessary.
 

iammeiam

Member
If they do this, I'll laugh. And save $100. So I guess as far as baseless rumors go, I'm for it?

MS is still going to run into perception problems because they're reacting too quickly. They're supposed to keep making mistakes for years, so when they do finally turn around people can nod sagely and say they've learned their lesson. Acting before it all goes to shit financially is just not how things usually go.
 

Orca

Member
Excuse my bluntness, but what sort of half-assed equivocation is this?

Consoles require a controller.
Consoles require power.
Consoles require a display.

A console requires an always-listening camera and microphone like a fish requires a bicycle.

Haven't they already said you can set it to not listen if you choose not to have the ability to use the 'Xbox On' function?
 

G17

Member
I don't mind having Kinect in the box, that's actually a great thing. But please let me unplug the thing when I'm not using it.

I'm in if that's the case even at $499.
 

Neo Ankh

Neo Member
That game got delayed until 2014... are you proposing they delay their launch until then?

I know, it's pretty silly to force Kinect on everyone and still not launch with a showpiece game for the device... but this is the new MS we're talking about here. The MS that doesn't care if their actions and directives make sense. They'll throw money at them until we relent.

I didn't know that. Well in that case I would throw in the headset and Killer Instinct for $499. It does seem to be a bit of a showcase for Twitch and Kinect. It also would get people more familiar with downloading their console games not to mention greatly increasing the amount of season pass/DLC they would sell for it.
 

Miles X

Member
You. Obviously. Know. Nothing. About. Business. To make such a ridiculous statement. You can't just take huge risks like that considering that your other business are falling due to such risks. For example, if you've read their latest earning reports, they made a profit..indeed but they also lost alot because of faltering sales everywhere else.

http://mashable.com/2013/07/18/microsoft-q4-2013/

Yes, Android literally is what's making them money as well as services down the road however, it isn't peachy cream. Learning some economics on how things work will also tell you how they even got that $500 in the first place. I can't explain it because I'm no expert but there is a lot to consider than just saying $400

Yes You. Can. Dude, do yourself a favour, stop embarssing yourself and go give yourself a history lesson on Microsoft's financial decisions regarding their consoles.

Fact - They were willing to take a HUGE (not really, but by your palty standards) risk with Xbox, lost billions, moved onto 360.

Fact - Lost billions on the 360 too, then reaped it back in the latter part of the gen.

Fact - The EDD/360 is making significant money now. So they have a buffer, something they've never had before.

Fact - If they deem it important enough, they will swallow a $bill ($100/10 million consoles) to gain parity with PS4 and it still won't come close to losses made on Xbox and the early days of Xbox 360.

They have a history for this, they have the funds, and you think $1b is a risk?? They lost like $600 million from Danger a year or so back, $1b is nothing to MS and it's overlooked.
 
They absolutely positively aren't dropping the Kinect.

The Kinect is the Blu-Ray of the generation, in that there will be a sizeable percentage of mass-market people who will absolutely buy the console because of the feature set. I know on this gaming forum people keep downplaying the UI and TV features enables by Kinect, but that's absolutely going to broaden their market beyond all of us gamers willing to shell out out money at launch.

How about dropping the price to $449 with six months of Live? Or some Live credits - $25 in your account or something, now that they went to real currency? Would that do it for you?
 
It doesn't matter what those companies are doing, you're clutching at straws. What matters is the numbers themselves. When they make $15bill a year, they can afford to drop off $1b (heck it fluctuates more than that on a yearly basis anyway).

Your reasoning is poor.

Losing money is fine. It's par for course for every business, especially when R&D, cut-throat hardware business and many other logistics are involved.

The question was whether or not the 'investment' makes sense & what other parts of the business think about this. Big corporations don't just decided to pop... say a billion into what is fundamentally a 'minimal value' return.
 
Only because MS is requiring it. Navigating through the dashboard, buying items on the store, going through a webpage don't need the Kinect sensor, I can do all that with the Xbox One controller.

So as a matter of fact, it's integral to the Xbox One experience. As a matter of opinion, you think that's stupid.

Time will tell.
 

jond76

Banned
Haven't they already said you can set it to not listen if you choose not to have the ability to use the 'Xbox On' function?

Yes, but but but... The NSA boogyman!

People will conveniently forgets those details if it helps them justify their purchasing decisions.
 
This. Thank you. Those who are afraid of it are welcome not to buy it.

Even if the Kinect costs half the system.... "one of the rumors stated"

Even if you have to pay half the systems price if anything goes wrong with the Kinect to play games that don't use it?

Even if your launch console is bricked because you got a defective Kinect?
 

ekim

Member
I am convinced OP is Reiko's alt, he only creates whishful tale from my ass xbone1 threads

Wut? You should recheck your claim.

Edit: I'm not denying I'm doing a lot of X1 threads but most of them aren't wishful rumor threads. I'm also doing PS4 threads. And yeah - I'm a little X1 fanboy as others are PS4 fanboys.
 

harSon

Banned
handytips.info?

bullshit.com?

We'll know soon enough. The rumor regarding Microsoft reversing its DRM/Always Online policies came from a site that nobody heard of. But like all rumors, this should be taken with a grain of salt until proven otherwise.
 

shandy706

Member
I don't mind having Kinect in the box, that's actually a great thing. But please let me unplug the thing when I'm not using it.

I'm in if that's the case even at $499.

Are there people that actually make an effort to unplug their Kinect?!

That...that's just funny to me. The Kinect in our living room hasn't been unplugged since launch night.
 
If this is true this changes things. Thats the difference between ms and sony. Ms adjusts to the market but sony is stubborn. happened with the ps3 and is happening with the vita. It'll be interesting when the xbox one with kinnect is $399. It will be a better value proposition and competition will be fiercer cos it will be down to the games and Ms has shown its load. After gamescom we'll see the clear winner in terms of launch games.

What are you talking about? The PS4 is the proof that Sony listened and the whole reason MS is backtracking on everything....
 

Miles X

Member
Losing money is fine. It's par for course for every business, especially when R&D, cut-throat hardware business and many other logistics are involved.

The question was whether or not the 'investment' makes sense & what other parts of the business think about this. Big corporations don't just decided to pop... say a billion into what is fundamentally a 'minimal value' return.

That's why this isn't a done deal, MS has to decide if they want to give PS4 an early lead which could possibly snowball, that in itself is a bigger risk than $1b.
 
What do you mean? The essentials of the console are navigating the dashboard, entering the store, navigating a webpage. None require Kinect.
We don't know how you'd snap applications, we don't know how you'd "instantly" switch between games/apps/tv without kinect, we don't know how you'd use the TV functionality without kinect, we don't know how you'd interact with snapped applications without kinect (how would you switch inbetween control of the game and the app).

Stuff like that. I'm sure you could guess how it might be done with a controller, but we don't actually have any details on that.


And even then, I look at kinect sort of like a touch screen on a smartphone.
Sure you could use arrow keys and a select button to navigate, but having a touchscreen makes the smartphone so much more convenient and useful.
So even though kinect might not be required to use the features, it makes them so much more feasible on a console.
 
*DBZ Super Saiyan post

Okay, this was pretty funny.

So, uh, if this turns out to be true, is there anything MS WON'T have reversed on? I mean it's great that their doing this, but it seems they lack no conviction or confidence in their original intentions. Everything seems reactionary.

Also, when is Gamescom?
 

Bsigg12

Member
We'll know soon enough. The rumor regarding Microsoft reversing its DRM/Always Online policies came from a site that nobody heard of. But like all rumors, this should be taken with a grain of salt until proven otherwise.

Giantbomb.com is unheard of?
 

omonimo

Banned
I'm expecting, after this news, a sony reintroduction of free multiplayer access for the ps4 at GDC, it's inevitable.
 

Barzul

Member
People asking Microsoft to drop Kinect, it will never happen. Cboat already said Microsoft will ride with it to the grave. If they can price match Sony, the value of the Xbox One increase out the roof. The mass market won't care about GDDR5 or 1.8 teraflops, they'll care about price and how one has a camera and the other doesn't. That being said, I can't see this happening.
 

Alienous

Member
If true. they see the Wii U falling of the bridge in slow motion, and they aren't having that shit happen to them.

Good idea.
 

jond76

Banned
Even if the Kinect costs half the system.... "one of the rumors stated"

Even if you have to pay half the systems price if anything goes wrong with the Kinect to play games that don't use it?

Even if your launch console is bricked because you got a defective Kinect?

You have to stop thinking about it as two different pieces of hardware rather than one system.

Like Onstar or a backup camera in a new car purchase. If that feature dissuades you, there's another car without it.
 
You have to stop thinking about it as two different pieces of hardware rather than one system.

Like Onstar or a backup camera in a new car purchase. If that feature dissuades you, there's another car without it.

It is a separate piece of hardware. You can even put it in hibernation and function just fine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom