fluffydelusions
Member
Dat cerny
But Major Nelson said.....
Where'd they go?
Unpossible. Microsoft invented DirectX, so they couldn't be slower than Sony, right guys?
But Major Nelson said.....
but directx
But muh cloud is infinite
But I've seen Titanfall...
Oh my poor F5 key.
Time to get the popcorn ready.
Direct X was supposed to fix that difference...
Are they taking into account the audio chip though?
Unpossible. Microsoft invented DirectX, so they couldn't be slower than Sony, right guys?
No surprise at all. When you have the second coming of Christ as your systems architect you know you got something good going.
lol He opened the floodgates.Uh oh.
Perfection.gif
What have I done?
He is most probably referring to the GPU, and we have known this for months now.
They CREATED DirectX.Unpossible. Microsoft invented DirectX, so they couldn't be slower than Sony, right guys?
:lol :lol
Uh oh.
Does this even matter? The 360 was less powerful than the PS3 and the multiplatform games for both performed the same and in some cases better on the 360.
Does this even matter? The 360 was less powerful than the PS3 and the multiplatform games for both performed the same and in some cases better on the 360.
Does this even matter? The 360 was less powerful than the PS3 and the multiplatform games for both performed the same and in some cases better on the 360.
Does this even matter? The 360 was less powerful than the PS3 and the multiplatform games for both performed the same and in some cases better on the 360.
Performance: Im not dismissing raw performance. Im stating as I have stated from the beginning that the performance delta between the two platforms is not as great as the raw numbers lead the average consumer to believe. There are things about our system architecture not fully understood, and there are things about theirs as well, that bring the two systems into balance.
People DO understand that Microsoft has some of the smartest graphics programmers IN THE WORLD. We CREATED DirectX, the standard APIs that everyone programs against. So while people laude Sony for their HW skills, do you really think we dont know how to build a system optimized for maximizing graphics for programmers? Seriously? There is no way were giving up a 30%+ advantage to Sony. And ANYONE who has seen both systems running could say there are great looking games on both systems. If there was really huge performance difference it would be obvious.
I get a ton of hate for saying this but its been the same EVERY generation. Sony claims more power, they did it with Cell, they did it with Emotion Engine, and they are doing it again. And, in the end, games on our system looked the same or better.
Im not saying they havent built a good system Im merely saying that anyone who wants to die on their sword over this 30%+ power advantage are going to be fighting an uphill battle over the next 10 years
The time is NOW to activate Major Nelson's GAF account.
Does this even matter? The 360 was less powerful than the PS3 and the multiplatform games for both performed the same and in some cases better on the 360.
The time is NOW to activate Major Nelson's GAF account.
Does this even matter? The 360 was less powerful than the PS3 and the multiplatform games for both performed the same and in some cases better on the 360.
GAF continues to get people into trouble lol.
The 360 was easier to develop for and I thought the common consensus was that they 360 at least edged the PS3 out as far as it's GPU went, even if it had a worse CPU so it wasn't as cut and dry as "PS3 is more powerful"
I don't think the X1 is supposed to have any particularly meaningful advantages.