Not intentionally, but yes.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
DF/JF: Battlefield 4 PS4 vs XB1 videos/screens (900p PS4, 720p XB1)
- Thread starter shinobi602
- Start date
Not intentionally, but yes.
Not really. But you can export a movie/images sequence from Photoshop and make it into an apng using apnggasm http://sourceforge.net/projects/apngasm/
Most likely not intentionally. The Xbox One version on DF looks off compared to everything else. They admitted to their mistake.
ConteZero76
Member
Kun Aguero
Member
PS4 version looks pretty good in the jackfrags and vikkstar vids I've seen. Any XBO multiplayer game-play about?
Without a doubt this is the case as well. I was just positing that DirectX might make some very small improvements on certain textures given what it's capable of. Nothing worth noting, obviously.
And DF is easily the most reliable out of the bunch. They explained they were clearly rushing in capturing footage and didn't have time to calibrate their custom equipment with what the consoles were putting out.
FranXico
Member
DF capture happened. The settings were not tweaked for each console, and happened to be closer to optimal for the X1.
That says AO not AA.Here:
family_guy
Member
From the screenshots the Xbox One version does look a little bit better, but then I remember the Vivid mode on my Samsung and Sony HDTVs that would achieve the same thing if I wanted to.
TheRealTalker
Banned
Haha, just realized Kevin Dent answered me yesterday.
Apparently his eyes do lie.
"Dr" Indeed
Here:
AO =/= AA
Kazuma Kiryu
Member
It's tough being on the other side of DF comparisons. All of a sudden, running at a higher framerate and higher resolution with AO already enabled (which x1 doesn't have as of right now) is somehow "slightly better" when the comparisons between the ps3 and 360 era mostly focused on AA methods and framerate, at the same resolutions, and had everyone going "i only play games where they're technically best, which is on the 360".
It takes an old-schooler to see sense.
Clockwork
Member
That's not exactly correct, unless crushed blacks are optimal.
Kssio_Aug
Member
Thanks for the aswers! I see... what a mistake of theirs. :/
Anyway, the game looks good! And I enjoyed PS4 quality, just kind expected to be at 1080p like Killzone SF.
IAmRandom31
Banned
lol, im just joking man. Inside I am crying, due to the ... augh ... can't even explain how bad this all is, on the outside I am laughing hysterically though. Can't wait to see peoples reactions when they get this stuff inside their own house with their own TV.
Mr Moose
Member
Haha, just realized Kevin Dent answered me yesterday.
Apparently his eyes do lie.
He's getting shat on for being full of shit: https://twitter.com/TheKevinDent/status/395149296841932800
Looks like he's been deleting tweets (I think...).
You had me worried for a minute.
It depends on the number of active objects on-screen that are being sampled for shadow occlusion, but that's a good estimate. I would imagine it's closer to 5FPS, as irrelevant as that might be to some.
LabouredSubterfuge
Member
AO, not AA as far as I'm aware.
BloodMoney
Banned
Did not realize Chalky White was in this game.
Summary below for people who just joined saw the pics in op and Come to conclusion
PS4 Version =
Xbone=
PS4 Version =
- Resolution is 900p
Higher avg FPS(40-60)
Have AO
Appear blurry due to Improper Calibration by DF
Xbone=
Resolution is 720p
Lower Avg FPS (30-60)
Appear sharp due to Improper Caliberation by DF
No AO (to be patched day one )
I did and I don't see anything on aa.
Arkage
Banned
What? Spending three times much money gets you better graphics? You don't say.
IAmRandom31
Banned
yeah that comment was just saying that AO was being added to the X1 version, since AO is not present.
But still, your framerate seems to be 35-60fps with massive spikes up and down and your adding resource hungry post processing? Hmmm ...
The PS4 looks better to me XBO looks like an overexposed mess in those gifs. I have watched the footage and except for DF's botching I could tell that the PS4 was better.
I was being sarcastic.
I obviously know the disparity between price is there. I'm just responding to the claims that somehow these consoles version would/could/should look better than their PC counterparts. It's obviously not the case and won't be this generation. I imagine you can still get a budget PC for ~$500 that is nearly as capable as these consoles at this point.
Sorry, I think I got it mixed up with the DF article which says post processing AA.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgF1A72wG2Q
66 fps No AO, 59 with
66 fps No AO, 59 with
SenjutsuSage
Banned
Only additional effect would seem to be ambient occlusion (and I guess better AA), but according to the technical director ambient occlusion will be added to the xbox one version day one, same tech as ps4 and pc.
https://twitter.com/repi/status/395138203075633152
And the ps4 does have better framerate overal' according to df, but somehow I don't know how much of a win that is considering the xbox one version's framerate is a pretty damn stable v-synced 60fps consistently throughout the campaign. I've watched some more SP footage, and it goes without saying that framerate isn't at all a serious issue on the xbox one version.
Don't take my word for it, look at videos such as the below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0XMG2ml8VE
Look at the crazy weather conditions, trees swaying every which way, amazing atmospherics, rain, visual wind effects. I really didn't want to watch anymore SP, but I couldn't resist since a friend e-mailed this one to me saying I should check it out. And this is with the youtube compression and lack of proper 60fps support. Anyway, that's enough of this for me.
Both versions look fantastic. I said it. I ain't taking it back.
BlazingDarkness
Member
This is misleading.
PS4 version appears blurry/ Xbone version appears sharp outside of DF.
For example, here;
From Video Gamer:
So don't try and imply this disparity is wholly because of DF capture.
endlessflood
Member
They explained that in a neogaf post well and truly after the footage had been released... footage they'd been sitting on for some time due to the embargo. Did they look at the footage and not see the obvious differences from what they saw in person when they captured all of this stuff at the DICE event? Did they not immediately notice the crushed blacks?
How can you build a reputation on comparing the minutiae of video game graphics, and then miss something that was immediately obvious to everyone else the moment they looked at the footage?
I have DF at 0 from 1 in next gen comparisons, so I'd say they're easily the least reliable out of the bunch so far
Haha, just realized Kevin Dent answered me yesterday.
Apparently his eyes do lie.
I don't understand how he got this wrong, then doubled down on it.
He's a maroon and we should stop posting his tweets.
So why the fuck release any footage or comparison shots then. They are just ruining their credibility with each new article.
The issue was saturation (black levels), but couldn't the "blurryness" simply be AA? PS4 possibly using some FXAA.
Exactly 'this thread', people are so seething that both versions look pretty much the same that they are clinging on to any little thing they can to show the PS4 version is better.
I can't really take much more of this place.
MemoryHumanity
Member
Yeah, this. Xbone version looks sharper and seems to have better colours/contrast. What's going on?
Feel free to leave then, but that wont change that the PS4 version is technically MUCH superior and everyone who actually saw it agrees that it also looks way better, which doesnt point at any form of "console parity".
Au Revoir!
boredandlazy
Member
And no one expected any different...Both versions look fantastic. I said it. I ain't taking it back.