UNCMark said:
Perhaps you missed the cola wars, the fast food wars, the beer wars.
I didn't. Perhaps YOU did. None of those competitors were on "even footing" when it came to sales. They still aren't. Unless you think coke at 48b in sales is on even footing with PepsiCo at 16b.
Sales parity is IRRELEVANT to the consumer. Sales differential is the RESULT of competition.
Competition results in a winner and a loser. It's not best for the consumer to have everyone on even footing "just because that's best for the consumer." You won't find evidence of this in history; you are depicting controlled markets and zombie corporations.
Here's how it should work: two systems took different paths to the market. That is true. The market will validate them both independently. Someone might lose and it's going to suck for some Internet group.
People are confusing the outcome of competition with the benefits of competition, which is where this silliness over sales comes in.