Spiritwalker
Member
I'm still getting it, but the presentation definitely left a bad taste in my mouth. So many bad, anti-consumer decisions by Nintendo. Ugh.
I've read probably three people saying something like that in years of forums/social media, yet I've read thousands of people reminding Nintendo fans this thing.There is this strange idea that Nintendo is the pure virgin of virtue and everyone else is a money-grubby whore.
All of this is still true. The only thing that changed is its a bit more expensive than you thought, and the third party support so far has probably been less than you hoped for. If these are dealbreakers, don't get it. The hate train has been ridiculous, you should snap out of that denial.I was super hyped for
- The most powerful traditional handheld to date
- Catching up with Nintendo Amazing First Party
- Something for Travel
- Keep the Kids happy on trips in the car
- Home Console Games at Home & on the Move
All the things you were hyped for are true! That's exactly why I'm getting it!.
My advice to any Nintendo fan who own a Wii U to just wait. You can play the major title for the console for a console you already own and I don't think the difference is worth the price. No reason to buy this day one. Remember the 3DS with the price-cut we maybe looking at similar situation here.
This is not the NES classic. Don't worry about not able to buy one and artificial scarcity and the "sold out everywhere" headlines.
Yep. This is true. OP, don't let this forum negativity drain you, man. You were hyped for something that is still what you want. Get it and enjoy it with your kids, I'm sure they'll be happy...and so will you.
There's honestly no reason to buy one until Black Friday unless you desperately want to play Zelda on new hardware. If it's bombing hard by then, you can pick one up with Mario at probably a cheaper price that now.
I'd agree if Sony were making a PSP3. But sadly they aren't, so Nintendo are the last stand for handheld gaming. At this point I just have to hope Nintendo come to their senses quickly and turn this around somehow. But I'm not holding my breath.Yeah, this is it. This is the turnpoint in my philosophy. They had their chance.
I am now FIRMLY in the go 3rd party camp. If I'm not playing Zelda on my PS5 in 2023 then damn it allllllll
What if you want all the cool free games they'll give you for the second Ambassador program?
Lego City Undercover came out a few months after launch..which remains to this day one my favourite Wii U games.Yeah betting on more announcements for this year is not a good idea. Maybe they have more things up their sleeve for directs/E3 in the next couple months pre/post launch, but no one should be counting on that right now. If you're purchasing this thing, just expect what you've seen so far for the 2017 lineup to be the only things first party wise.
Maybe I'm misremembering, but I can only recall NSMBU, Nintendoland, and Zombi U as the only things of note for quite some time on the system. Otherwise it was an even worse value proposition at the time, other than getting Nintendo stuff in HD for the first time.
Yeah, OP, just go spend the money as soon as possible so you can feel the full brunt of that buyer's remorse with each game that gets delayed!
Us Wii U owners know such horrors.
Eventually it'll drop in price, the library will fill out and there will be some kick ass bundles.
I waited on the Wii U and got so many great games all at once it was amazing.
Lego City Undercover came out a few months after launch..which remains to this day one my favourite Wii U games.
Still NSMBU,Nintendoland and Zombiu at launch is a more attractive line-up to me than the Switch launch. I mean there's Zelda which I can get on Wii U anyway...and that's it.
What? There's no point in bullying the guy into not doing something he feels like he wants to do. What he was hyped about the NS is still true. He can do all of those things with it and that won't change. I purchased a Wii U at launch and have no regrets, but then I alway buy things that I know I'll want...whether now or in the future. I'm confident in what I like and so I don't need any validation.
If the OP is really not sure, then he can cancel and move on with his life, but the things he listed as being hyped about are true and there's no reason to not still be hyped.
I don't own a Wii U, have never owned one, and Zelda looks like a game I really want to play as soon as possible. I also think Mario Odyssey and MK8 look great.
The pricing is bonkers though. I dunno what to do.
- 32GB Storage (I've been living in the all Digital World)
- Paid Online with the bolt on App (This amazes me)
- Launch Lineup / Release Pacing
- The Monthly NES/SNES Game Rental
- Battery Life
- Price of Accessories
- 1 2 Switch Existing & Its Price
The more important question is, why didn't they announce them?
People seem to forget the importance of the yesterday event. The Switch is coming out in 7 weeks, the event was supposed to be the last marketing push Nintendo could do to make people run out to buy the Switch. If they have many big titles in development, it was the best time to let public know. They event announced a game that just enter its development ffs. If they have a new Metroid, Pokémon, etc cooking. Why can't they let us know?
Who's bullying?
I'm just trying to be practical.
This forum has a cycle of hype-fueled enablement followed by deepest, darkest dispair.
You forgot:
- huge bezel
- long charging times (better tape that power bank to your Switch)
- the only 2 interesting games available on Wii U too
- non-removable battery
- ridiculous base price
- 900p @ 2017
- Paid Online.
That's the cost of getting a 21st century online system, I guess. But we've known these paid services for a while now and we didn't accept PS+ in its original form until So y packed in free games. Nintendo doesn't exist in a vacuum. If their paid service costs just as much as PS+ they have lost their minds.
You are right but a big problem is the E3 so soon after launch. If they would announce everything now and they would show more of it at E3 everybody would say "meh, we knew about those games! Were are the new ones?" And IF they had shown a lot of games development, then they had to need announce games at er which are even further off. So the complain would be "meh, they announced only games we can play in 2 years+".
So there was no right way to do it right.
Nintendo knows that the hardcore gamers are the ones who buy that thing first and the casuals come later. So they can life with that small gap between launch and e3 and then start to get more people to play their system and make them buy it at the holidays this year.
- 1 2 Switch Existing & Its Price
You are right but a big problem is the E3 so soon after launch. If they would announce everything now and they would show more of it at E3 everybody would say "meh, we knew about those games! Were are the new ones?" And IF they had shown a lot of games development, then they had to need announce games at er which are even further off. So the complain would be "meh, they announced only games we can play in 2 years+".
So there was no right way to do it right.
Nintendo knows that the hardcore gamers are the ones who buy that thing first and the casuals come later. So they can life with that small gap between launch and e3 and then start to get more people to play their system and make them buy it at the holidays this year.
I think there are multiple factors here why people are so negative about this thing.
- Leakers lead them to believe other things.
I'm sorry, but that one is on you. If you believed random people on the Internet to the degree of adjusting your expectations I don't know what to tell you.
Judging from their E3 from last year, how much do you think Nintendo care about E3 right now? They have their own little show to show off their stuffs, why even bother bringing the games to E3 where they will be overshadowed by other massive games from PS4? I still think it was a better idea for them to unload most of their in-house games at yesterday event and skip E3 all together.
Huh. I never look at people's post histories because I'm not a weirdo.
Agendas, lol. What's your agenda? Damage control? Judge and jury?
As someone who's very much in the same boat as you OP. I'm treating this as sort of a market/gaming reality check for what the core gamer is today and what they want from their devices. I personally am having a hard time justifying the switch and their decisions around motion controls, and other what I see as gimmicky features especially in regards to the Joycon. They seem to be focused on recapturing that Wii audience. I wanted a powerful, effecient and value driven portable machine focused on core games that could be be played on the big screen as well. I'm kind of left feeling that it's a middling product in most regards.