• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Australia sends refugees back to country where they were already tortured.

Status
Not open for further replies.

PARANO1A

Member
BrWc7D_CUAAcQ2S.jpg:large


This would be funny if it wasn't so damn depressing

Is there a link to the interview of this?
 
Australians are generally apathetic and lazy due to our comfortable lives. Once you start actively informing them of the disgusting shit going on they tend to get at least a little concerned.

So hard to get up off the couch and do something about it though. Especially when the most widespread media spends their time demonising them.

I'm not sure we can really blame this one on apathy,there seems to be a nasty undercurrent of racism that's easy to stir up in Australia.
 
I'm not sure we can really blame this one on apathy,there seems to be a nasty undercurrent of racism that's easy to stir up in Australia.
Living in Sydney I've honestly never met anybody who didn't see the whole "boat people" thing as fear-mongering bullshit and I feel where I live is incredibly multicultural, but at the same time there has to be a bigger divide in mentality between the more metropolitan areas and the country side than what's immediately noticeable since I can't otherwise see why both Labor and Liberal kept playing up the issue.

I remember hearing from a friend doing a global studies degree that apparently we're vastly below most other 1st/2nd world countries in terms of how many immigrants we take on yearly. Not to mention the whole focuses on 'boats' is also dumb when most immigrants come via planes and those coming from boats are far more likely to be coming from war-torn countries following UN standards we're not supposed to be able to immediately turn away like this. I hope next elections the only focus isn't just on how badly the Liberals fucked up the budget.
 

Grunter

Member
Those bemoaning that this issue has "become" politicised are being somewhat naive. Every country has an immigration policy. The LNP were voted in at the end of last year very clearly stating that they would "stop the boats". Labor and the Greens claimed it couldn't be done but that is exactly what the LNP have done.
You may disagree with the policy or with how it has been done, but it was an election issue and they delivered on it.
It would be be helpful if immigration issues could be debated without cries of racist flying around. "Australia is a racist country" is just a ridiculous generalisation that doesn't contribute in any way. Debate about integration, economics, infrastructure, can any county really just have a policy that they will take in anyone from anywhere anytime?
When people arrive at a country by air they are able to proceed into that country only if they have a valid passport and if necessary, visa. If you do not you will be returned immediately. Yes of course people outstay their visas for whatever reason. If the authorities catch up with you then you will be arrested.
The unfortunate people who have been duped into paying thousands of dollars to get on a leaky boat that has a good chance of sinking on the voyage are told to throw away their passports on the way. The unscrupulous bastards who play on the hopes and fears of people who want to better their lives and end up putting their families lives at risk are the true criminals in all this.
 

Bodacious

Banned
Yes. They had fled to India initially but India was threatening to send them back to Sri Lanka.

So it's not just Australia. Between India and Australia, there's also Bangladesh, Myanmar, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia. Did they try any of those places before going to Australia, or did all of those countries also reject them? If everyone's rejecting them, then what's so specifically horrible that Australia has done the same?

.
 

Dead Man

Member
So it's not just Australia. Between India and Australia, there's also Bangladesh, Myanmar, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia. Did they try any of those places before going to Australia, or did all of those countries also reject them? If everyone's rejecting them, then what's so specifically horrible that Australia has done the same?

.
Indonesia doesn't accept refugees, most of the rest of the countries you listed have no resources. You are suggesting people go to each country in turn, cap in hand, and then go to the next one?

Just because the other countries can't or don't help doesn't excuse Australia handing them back to where they are fleeing from without a proper assessment. They asked 4 or 5 questions and then sent them back. Even if you think there is no obligation for Australia to accept them, surely you must agree there is an obligation to assess their claims?

Those bemoaning that this issue has "become" politicised are being somewhat naive. Every country has an immigration policy. The LNP were voted in at the end of last year very clearly stating that they would "stop the boats". Labor and the Greens claimed it couldn't be done but that is exactly what the LNP have done.
You may disagree with the policy or with how it has been done, but it was an election issue and they delivered on it.
It would be be helpful if immigration issues could be debated without cries of racist flying around. "Australia is a racist country" is just a ridiculous generalisation that doesn't contribute in any way. Debate about integration, economics, infrastructure, can any county really just have a policy that they will take in anyone from anywhere anytime?
When people arrive at a country by air they are able to proceed into that country only if they have a valid passport and if necessary, visa. If you do not you will be returned immediately. Yes of course people outstay their visas for whatever reason. If the authorities catch up with you then you will be arrested.
The unfortunate people who have been duped into paying thousands of dollars to get on a leaky boat that has a good chance of sinking on the voyage are told to throw away their passports on the way. The unscrupulous bastards who play on the hopes and fears of people who want to better their lives and end up putting their families lives at risk are the true criminals in all this.
It is not about immigration, that is separate to processing asylum seekers. The UN Convention that Australia has signed commits them to assessing claims for asylum and determining refugee status.

It would be helpful if you understood what you were talking about.
 
Yes. They had fled to India initially but India was threatening to send them back to Sri Lanka.

Can you post a source for this? I'm wondering where you got the information as other reports state otherwise. I haven't read one story where India was threatening to send them back to Sri Lanka, in fact Indian authorities have been lobbying to grant them citizenship.

One of the Tamil refugee advocates was saying that he was concerned about the refugees leaving India as they were giving up everything they had built up.

''We have land here, we have homes, we have electricity, we have education, and every time someone gets on a boat to go to Australia without a visa, we are losing that, and that is what I am trying to prevent.''

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-polit...-for-a-year-20140703-zsv9n.html#ixzz36YVQlNgB
 

DSKMan

Banned
This isn't as simple as the Tamil are victims of the Sri Lankan government. When the Tamil are just as guilty of horrible atrocities, including ethnic cleaning. So as far as we know some of these asylum seekers could themselves be guilty of crimes against humanity.
 

DSKMan

Banned
In fact we know some of the Tamil who participated in crimes against humanity including the massacre of children, and ethnic cleansing fled to India after the war, so it is very possible these asylum seekers could include these people.
 

Laughing Banana

Weeping Pickle
So what's the majority opinion of the Australian public regarding this matter? Because surely this is not something that both parties there would endorse if they don't have a strong public opinion backing them up?

Or is it they just don't care in general?
 
Living in Sydney I've honestly never met anybody who didn't see the whole "boat people" thing as fear-mongering bullshit and I feel where I live is incredibly multicultural, but at the same time there has to be a bigger divide in mentality between the more metropolitan areas and the country side than what's immediately noticeable since I can't otherwise see why both Labor and Liberal kept playing up the issue.

I remember hearing from a friend doing a global studies degree that apparently we're vastly below most other 1st/2nd world countries in terms of how many immigrants we take on yearly. Not to mention the whole focuses on 'boats' is also dumb when most immigrants come via planes and those coming from boats are far more likely to be coming from war-torn countries following UN standards we're not supposed to be able to immediately turn away like this. I hope next elections the only focus isn't just on how badly the Liberals fucked up the budget.

You cannot just compare the numbers - does Australia have the infrastructure to support that many refugees?


So what's the majority opinion of the Australian public regarding this matter? Because surely this is not something that both parties there would endorse if they don't have a strong public opinion backing them up?

Or is it they just don't care in general?

Honestly, most people don't care. People care more about their mortgage, jobs, etc.
 

Arksy

Member
We have a huge landmass but we don't have the infrastructure for our current population. Everyone is concentrated in two incredibly large and bloated cities...we should have a regional asylum seeker policy. Dump them all in the smaller towns so they grow. Pity it would be unconstitutional.
 

Lafiel

と呼ぶがよい
In fact we know some of the Tamil who participated in crimes against humanity including the massacre of children, and ethnic cleansing fled to India after the war, so it is very possible these asylum seekers could include these people.
How do we know this when there has been no assessment made about their claims?
 

dejay

Banned
So what's the majority opinion of the Australian public regarding this matter? Because surely this is not something that both parties there would endorse if they don't have a strong public opinion backing them up?

Or is it they just don't care in general?

A lot of people believe that the majority of people who arrive by boat aren't genuine refugees or are queue jumping. Personally, I don't know if it's true or not, but we should have a better way of processing them. We do have a substantial refugee population; going from THIS if you look at the "Natives per Refugee" column, we're "better" than a lot of countries, including some other western cultures, but nowhere near as good as some others. We can and should take more.

I'd also suggest that passion is greater amongst the antis than it is amongst the advocates. It's the same with gay marriage - the majority of voters polled support gay marriage, but aren't willing to prioritise it above more selfish concerns, where as the people against it are willing to prioritise it when it comes to an election.

How do we know this when there has been no assessment made about their claims?

You're forgetting those four questions. Assessment distilled into it's purest form.
 

devilhawk

Member
They took the wrong strategy of coming as refugees by boat. Now if they came as convicts...

Seriously though, this seems a fairly straightforward issue in comparison to tens of thousands of parent-less children appearing at your border.
 
I wonder how it worka when a country denies the entrance in cases like this. Is the boat just turned around while being told to go back where they came from, or are they escorted back. Because if its the former, what stops them from trying a different country like say New Zealand.
 

hidys

Member
I guess I'm in the camp that isn't opposed to controlling migration but is pretty much staunchly opposed to how refugees arriving by boat are actually treated. These conditions are inhumane and now we're not even bothering to process on land apparently? Or at least the government is actively denying/not confirming/hiding information about it for reasons unknown? What the fuck.

I would agree with this and even go as far as to say that some form of mandatory detention is vital.

But this is just... savage. The worst part is I actually think Scott Morison will become Prime Minister one day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom