ronaldthump
Member
them open critics comments show how little stake they place on content that's genuine and now I won't be giving them clicks
Make a blog/twitter/YouTube account for yourself/you and your mates.What do you propose then?
When I saw the blurb about the OpenCritic report, I felt partially responsible for what I perceive as vandalism.
That would be great.I wonder if jshackles is going to remove OpenCritic from Enhanced Steam now.
Well this thread took a turn.
It's really fucking strange that someone claiming to be from OpenCritic jumped into this thread so quickly to defend the EIC and straight up trash the writer of the article.
Pretty damn unprofessional on your own behalf and completely changes my view of OpenCritic.
Yeah, vandalising what? His own review?
All Brash needed to do was the bare minimum of editorial work and their beautiful site would be sparklingly pristine.
I'm sure it will be gone at some point. But it's still there, right at the top of the Brash Games site.
Make a blog/twitter/YouTube account for yourself/you and your mates.
Hell no. Brash deserves to be tarred and feathered for all this. What an odd defense.I'm the investigator at OpenCritic, and our report is indeed out Monday. Brash Games requested to be removed after learning about our investigation, which launched in March. We made a promise when we launched that we would conduct and publish investigations when we get evidence of wrongdoing, so that's what we're going to do.
Ahead of that, I just want to say that I strongly urge the gaming community to use this opportunity to practice compassion, understanding, and forgiveness. This seems to be a case of a hobbyist who got in a bit over his head.
This article is immature and ultimately self-defeating. It's simply unprofessional and goes against civility. Does the author think that moves like this help his odds of getting hired? Does this really help make serious amends? Does it help motivate Brash Games to restore content rights or fix their issues? In general, I simply want to dissuade mob justice here, which articles like this can sometimes spark. OpenCritic was explicitly mentioned in Ben's article, and I don't want anyone to read that as an endorsement.
Last edit:
It was a mistake for me to post this so late at night. To be honest, running with this investigation has been personally taxing; in finalizing the report, I've been worried about the dark portions of the gaming community and what they might do as a result (DOXing, harassment, etc.). It might sound silly and possibly arrogant, but it's been something that's been keeping me up at night. I've heard so many stories from colleagues in the industry about death threats, harassment, etc.
When I saw the blurb about the OpenCritic report, I felt partially responsible for what I perceive as vandalism. The thought of "what if I just sparked something terrible?" is personally unnerving.
My intent in posting here was to dissuade mob justice. My comments were improper and for that I apologize. It was an amateur gut reaction.
I mostly agree with this. My YouTube account has been rather fun, I don't have to answer to anybody, and the growth is nice if you have an idea of what to do.Make a blog/twitter/YouTube account for yourself/you and your mates.
OpenCritic investigator cautions people because he doesn't want a lynch mob causing this to be even more of a shitstorm...turns lynch mob on himself inadvertently.
Boy, totally didn't see that coming.../s
Im not sure I would get the pitchforks out towards Open Critic just yet, because of some random and reactionary "investigator". I really question just how much Open Critic even agrees with his stance, if at all.
Bye, open critic.
OpenCritic has always seemed like a wannabe operation in any case. Metacritic was already there and works well enough for what it is. Dumb to have this "me too" operation that only focuses on video games.
I think Paul Ryan is in a really emotionally tough spot and is trying to manage. This is a 6+ year project for him and his team, and I bet he feels like his world is crashing down.
I've seen Brash re-attribute multiple reviews. One author had her full content rights restored as a gesture of goodwill.
OpenCritic started with us - four friends that want to drive both real and positive change in the video game industry. Call it naive optimism, but we do truly believe that we can make things better for developers, critics, and most importantly, gamers.
Just want to jump in in defence of the opencritic dude here. Think folks are perhaps being a tad harsh on him. He did defend Paul Ryan and say that he was under pressure etc but at no point did he defend his actions, merely alluded to the opinion that he is attempting to make amends for poor behaviour and criticise the writer who whistle blew on Brash games due to the manner in which he criticised them.
I disagree with his opinion but the vitriol aimed at Opencritic is out of proportion to the point that you'd be forgiven for believing he was in collusion with Brash and their shitty business practises.
He was literally trying to help out brash tho
The fact that hes the founder and an 'investigator' and also posting on the behalf of brash during the investigation is not only unprofessional, it reeks of damage control. People saying they cant trust open critic isnt an overreaction, its justified because of the response by the founder.
You're an investigator and you let yourself write out an "amateur gut reaction"? I hope you don't do that shit when you're on the job.
The "this could all lead to an online witch hunt" response, while probably coming from a genuine place, also feels like concern trolling to me. Should no one ever whistle blow or report work place injustices because it could turn into a witch hunt?
The quality of the writing is more important than how big the site is. A Steam user review can be as valid as a review from IGN if it's written wellHonestly, I'm surprised that people even pay attention to review sites outside the big few. I barely read reviews nowadays, but if I do I'll skim Eurogamer, maybe a Giant Bomb or RPS review.
Same, had a similar experience recently. A game site I was writing for dropped me unexpectedly due to "restructuring", and a few months later, the site disappeared completely. None of their articles available and writers who werent paidI used to write for a tech website when I really needed the money.
25¢ for three 300 word articles a day. My articles no longer exist so I cant even use them in my portfolio.
Thankfully I learned that people that care will pay good money and you shouldn't settle for less than you think you are worth and now earn 25$ per 500 word article.
These small websites are often scum and are more than happy to manipulate inexperienced writers starting out.
OpenCritic has always seemed like a wannabe operation in any case. Metacritic was already there and works well enough for what it is. Dumb to have this "me too" aggregator that only focuses on video games.
Brash is an awful, awful excuse for a "games website" and really gives a bad name to the rest of us who are actually trying to establish a decent place in the games journalism world. That said, they're so awful and insignificant that I really can't fathom why people are giving them attention, even if it's an negative as this.