This would be really cool but I'd be surprised if they had it ready by then.
Do the character outlines bother anyone else a little?
Outlines are to show specials.
This would be really cool but I'd be surprised if they had it ready by then.
Do the character outlines bother anyone else a little?
I dont think vita can run gow ascencion without some significant downgrade, it's kinda easy to see sly 4 running on vita and even then they have to cut the framefrate in half for vita version. Same with pbr, but its hard to imagine the more graphic heavyweight like gowa and last of us running on vita.
I think the modest visual is simply because sanzaru games are not that big and not because they planned both version since the start. If anything, this probably start as vita title before they move it to ps3I wouldn't be surprised if Sly 4 was envisioned as a PS3/Vita game from the start, hence the relatively modest visuals of the PS3 version.
Outlines are to show specials.
As in the special characters, P1-4?
As in the special characters, P1-4? Otherwise it seems the thick white glow is there when the players are idle too although after watching some gameplay still can't tell, but looked fine in the matches. Useful for keeping track of the players gameplay wise I'm sure, always had that trouble of focussing when it zoomed out with SSB.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aVxcHTD1fY
Keeps cutting out to the players though.
This one is slightly better: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZUU-pdO8Rw
i'll buy the Vita version for sure Dat Screen
Vita has no games
Vita has no portable suited games
Vita has no exclusive games
Vita has no games in x genre
What will be the next goal post?
I'm not sure if I should really congratulate them for making what should've been bloody obvious from the beginning. So what happened? Did they only just realise that they should be releasing a Vita version as well? Or did they deliberately delay the Vita version announcement because...
Delayed system announcements aren't new (Assassin's Creed 1 comes to mind) but the logic behind them seems pretty stupid. Best case scenario, you get in the headlines twice, which probably gives you about as much publicity as a new game trailer. Worst case scenario, people only hear the first announcement and have no clue about the second version.
That Sony's doing this with their newly launched, poorly selling system is fucking mind numbing.
After that comes the phase of
"3DS sold x times more. Why are devs supporting Vita instead - it's anti Nintendo conspiracy"
How are they ports if they are completely new games that haven't been released yet?
Third party games would need to be announced for the system first before anyone can pull out that card.
LBP Karting would be perfect for Vita IMO.
I guess it will be announced at E3.Sony registers Vita domain:
http://whois.domaintools.com/battleroyalthegamevita.com
Sony registers Vita domain:
http://whois.domaintools.com/battleroyalthegamevita.com
Battle Royal the Game? Possible name change?
edit: eh, maybe not. They have multiple name variations registered.
"Battle Royale: The Game" is even bloody worse.
Sony registers Vita domain:
http://whois.domaintools.com/battleroyalthegamevita.com
Not Royale? Seems odd.
Here's a reason, because net code is better on PSV and its firmware has better options for PSN on PSV. Cross talk being one such feature.I somewhat agree with you. I can see the appeal of something like Sly on Vita over PS3. But this, no I can't. It's a multiplayer game designed for playing with others. I have no idea why anyone would rather buy it on Vita.
Because most people who have a PS3 and a Vita are not going to buy the game on Vita over PS3. It's pointless.