entremet
Member
Tell that to US police departments:
This not the norm in the US. Most cops are wearing standard uniforms. Those look like SWAT units.
Tell that to US police departments:
Every country has a counter terrorism unit but at least some of those pics was just regular county police if I'm not mistaken
yeah because fuck their right to self defense...
Yeah. I understand that this guy was warned etc but still in most european countries police would have disarmed him without killimg him.So what non-lethal options were used?
This not the norm in the US. Most cops are wearing standard uniforms. Those look like SWAT units.
Cops aren't trained to shoot in the leg, just FYI. That's not a thing they do.
The point is lots of small departments that have no need for SWAT teams have this kind of gear and look for excuses to use it. (Usually for war on drugs related activities).
Then they use the money seized on drug raids to buy more fancy gear.
If they tried to aim for the leg, then I or any one of dozens of onlookers could have gotten killed by a stray bullet.
The point is lots of small departments that have no need for SWAT teams have this kind of gear and look for excuses to use it. (Usually for war on drugs related activities).
Then they use the money seized on drug raids to buy more fancy gear.
Uh, so? If officer one tries a taser and misses with the smaller target or it doesn't work and officer two still ends up having to shoot him what's the problem?
Uh, so? Fuck it, why not, if you're just going to go and shoot the person otherwise might as well try it. :shrug: Who knows, right?
If they tried to aim for the leg, then I or any one of dozens of onlookers could have gotten killed by a stray bullet.
This not the norm in the US. Most cops are wearing standard uniforms. Those look like SWAT units.
You could have been hit by a stray bullet fired at center mass too. Just saying. Could have missed or penetrated the target. Realistically, if you weren't in any danger with them shooting center mass you'd likely not be in any more danger with them shooting lower unless they walked like a crab.If they tried to aim for the leg, then I or any one of dozens of onlookers could have gotten killed by a stray bullet.
Small 21 year old student approaches group of muscular police officers with a knife.
Explain exactly why they had to use a gun? They might get a cut on their arm, or something? Ridiculous police work from America as always.
He was told endlessly to drop the knife and instead he was walking towards the cops with it. Unfortunate outcome, but I can't blame the police.
and hasn't this whole 'bring out the car' capability been buffed or reinstated in some way recently? I heard it mentioned as one of Trumps Obama reversals.
Isn't there also a system that funnels ex-military gear towards Police departments at knock down prices combined with budgets that have to be used, to be justified?
Draw and aim, is this the Wild West? Guns are already drawn when they respond to this shit.You only have so much time to stop them before they get to you. And at a certain close range the guy with the knife has the advantage over a gun (the time it takes to draw and aim will take too long for the time it takes them to close and stab).
Uh, so? If officer one tries a taser and misses with the smaller target or it doesn't work and officer two still ends up having to shoot him what's the problem?
Uh, so? Fuck it, why not, if you're just going to go and shoot the person otherwise might as well try it. :shrug: Who knows, right?
Uh, so?
Look here. Your wording is fucking terrible. The end result was essentially putting down another human being like a dog and you say hitting them with pepper spray probably wouldn't have helped the situation. What situation? Shooting them? How could it hurt the "situation," assuming you mean keeping the person alive more than shooting them in the chest? This is INSANE.
Everywhere else you're like reliable this, reliable that, get this, nobody would give two shits if it was tried and didn't work and the end result was still this person dead. Wouldn't be a fucking issue outside of friends and family, everyone else would say they(the police) tried and carry on.
Do you not see the absurdity in this?
My guess, you're not going to be in a situation where you think it's reliable enough to be your first choice am I right? Probably have to be a naked handcuffed person lying face down on the ground before using a taser would be reliable enough to use.
The point is, is that as a cop you know in the end that you might have to shoot a person, right? So how is trying something that might not work worse than not trying at all and just shooting that person? You come up with all these excuses not to try something, for what? Why? Like I said, if they didn't work and they still had to shoot it is what it is.
This comes back to my previous question. One on one I get it. I wouldn't pull pepper spray or a taser first when responding to a call about an armed person I'd have my gun out too. I get it. Once more people show up though I'd feel like there were more opportunities to try something else. So why don't you? Is it because of your weapon's reliability, afraid everyone but you would miss or have their guns jam and the one person who tries an unreliable non-lethal use of force first was the only one who's weapon would have worked and hit the target?
So it comes back to my question of how many cops would it take before it's safe enough for them to try something unreliable? How many?
Now again, these guys apparently didn't have anything else so just did a poor job of stalling, or perhaps intentionally stopped stalling to purposefully end it.
When they got to the part where one officer went into that garage, while the other backed off the other way, this is were a few things went wrong.
I remember a situation in dominican republic where there was a crazy guy (kinda skinny and small) with a knife and a bunch of policemen tried to subdue him. If i recall, 3 of them died from injuries before the guy got shot down
Yup, Trump re-instated the program mentioned in this post:
So that surplus military equipment can be funneled to police departments. Obama had previously stopped this via executive order.
How many citizens are armed?
Not if they had done their job properly and cleared the area of bystanders.
You could have been hit by a stray bullet fired at center mass too. Just saying. Could have missed or penetrated the target. Realistically, if you weren't in any danger with them shooting center mass you'd likely not be in any more danger with them shooting lower unless they walked like a crab.
it was irrelevant because while you said it's where things went wrong you also went off a checklist of why nothing else but shooting the person would have worked, beside rubber bullets and bean bags. Oh and you critiqued multiple cops giving orders, which while fair was probably not the deal breaker in this case, the person was never going to follow orders nor was the person shot trying to follow conflicting orders from several officers.You completely missed or ignored this part of my post:
So then why list everything as unreliable?Personally, I would have tried use the tazer. That would be on my escalation tree given the circumstances that this looks like a suicide by cop.
It also doesn't explain why our armed police don't kill people armed with knives and yours do, recent terrorism aside of course.
Small 21 year old student approaches group of muscular police officers with a knife.
Explain exactly why they had to use a gun? They might get a cut on their arm, or something? Ridiculous police work from America as always.
While I'm not upset that they didn't try to shoot the legs I think some of ya'll are exaggerating the shot here, imagine yourself walking forward calmly and look at your legs, if someone is facing directly in front of you, even while you're walking forward your legs are almost a single unbroken target, some people even hit their knees while they walk! So while yes, there is a slightly higher chance of missing, it could pass between them, if you're a shitty shot and pull to the left or right I guess you can't get lucky and hit an arm while shooting for the legs, but you'd kinda have to suck to miss both legs at a person walking towards you, and if you pull high and hit them in the chest, well, you tried.This is true. Risk is there either way. But risk of missing is higher when you're aiming for limbs instead of center mass. I understand why they didn't take the (extra) chance.
The US has 112.6 guns per 100 residents.
The UK has 6.6.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estimated_number_of_guns_per_capita_by_country
Honestly that's way more than I thought it would be.
That's much higher than I thought it would be too.
Hmm. I guess you have to factor in farmers, people who shoot pheasants and grouse as well as criminals. Still seems very high. I've never seen a gun in the UK that wasn't being held by a Policeman at an airport or to do with agricultural matters.
How many citizens are armed?
No disarm tactics? No other option than end the person's life? You really need this explaining?
So what non-lethal options were used?
Small 21 year old student approaches group of muscular police officers with a knife.
Explain exactly why they had to use a gun? They might get a cut on their arm, or something? Ridiculous police work from America as always.
I remember a situation in dominican republic where there was a crazy guy (kinda skinny and small) with a knife and a bunch of policemen tried to subdue him. If i recall, 3 of them died from injuries before the guy got shot down
This is dumb. knives kill. I'll argue they could have tried a beanbag round to his chest but their top concern is keeping him from running off and attacking someone else. Sucks he got shot but he should have dropped the knife.
Can we please not misgender a dead person?
it was irrelevant because while you said it's where things went wrong you also went off a checklist of why nothing else but shooting the person would have worked, beside rubber bullets and bean bags. Oh and you critiqued multiple cops giving orders, which while fair was probably not the deal breaker in this case, the person was never going to follow orders nor was the person shot trying to follow conflicting orders from several officers.
So then why list everything as unreliable?
Glad the cops ended the threat to the bystanders and themselves with no one else getting hurt.
Guy had a lethal weapon, I don't have a problem with cops responding with lethal force. LOL @ "shoot in the leg!" Yeah, ask Sean Taylor how that worked out. And there's no guarantee a taser or spray would have brought the person down right away. There's also no guarantee that once blinded/dazed by one of those, that the person doesn't harm one of the bystanders since they are now blind. How could cops guarantee this mentally unhinged person with a deadly weapon couldn't harm bystanders or the cops themselves? Put the person down. They did that. And they tried to talk the person down first. Can't put any blame on police here.
Glad the cops ended the threat to the bystanders and themselves with no one else getting hurt.
Person had a lethal weapon, I don't have a problem with cops responding with lethal force. LOL @ "shoot in the leg!" Yeah, ask Sean Taylor how that worked out. And there's no guarantee a taser or spray would have brought the person down right away. There's also no guarantee that once blinded/dazed by one of those, that the person doesn't harm one of the bystanders since they are now blind. How could cops guarantee this mentally unhinged person with a deadly weapon couldn't harm bystanders or the cops themselves? Put the person down. They did that. And they tried to talk the person down first. Can't put any blame on police here.