• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

CNN amends GOP debate criteria, possibly opening the door for Carly Fiorina to join

Status
Not open for further replies.
C

chadskin

Member
CNN is amending the criteria for its Republican presidential debate on September 16, possibly opening the door for Carly Fiorina to join the other top-tier candidates on the stage.

The cause: a lack of national public polling following the August 6 debate has so far provided only three new polls to determine the lineup for the Reagan Presidential Debate, according to a CNN statement.

As a result, CNN reevaluated its criteria and decided to add a provision that better reflects the state of the race since the first Republican presidential debate in August, the network announced Tuesday.

Now, any candidate who ranks in the top 10 in polling between August 6 and September 10 will be included.

The adjustment may result in additional candidates joining the top-tier debate, but the final podium placements will not be known until the eligibility window closes on September 10.
Click to expand...
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/09/01/politics/cnn-debate-criteria-amendment/index.html

Update:
According to a POLITICO calculation, in the three polls conducted since the first debate on Aug. 6, Fiorina is in seventh place, with an average of 5 percent.

CNN says they expect just two additional national polls will be released between now and the Sept. 10 deadline, making it difficult for Fiorina to fall out of the additional, post-debate top 10. (If Fiorina was at only 2 percent in the two forthcoming polls, she would still be in ninth place in this subsequent average.)
Click to expand...
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/cnn-changes-debate-criteria-clearing-path-for-fiorina-213237
 
S

sangreal

Member
The rule they were using to exclude fiorina (relying on polls pre-first-debate) was dumb, but they're just going to expand to more than 10? or am I reading that wrong? would be even more dumb

Arkeband said:
Do republicans actually like Fiorina? Her qualifications are being a horrible CEO and that's basically it.
Click to expand...

aside from being a terrible business woman, she allegedly did well in the first kids-table debate -- or so the media tells us, since nobody watched it
 
S

SwiftDeath

Member
Fenderputty said:
I might get frustrated enough at the stupidity to punch someone so, maybe ...
Click to expand...

I'm not sure we have enough data to determine if punching a fellow republican candidate in the live debate would lose you the debate. I mean imagine if that kind of thinking was to translate into your foreign policy.

"President FenderPutty: He's even willing to attack his allies to keep America safe!!!!"
 
S

sangreal

Member
adam387 said:
Every modern President creates a library for official things after they leave office....
Click to expand...

Yes, but the debate is indeed being held there because the GOP reveres him

despite his terrible legacy as president, mind you

Regardless of what you think of him, it is funny that they can't move on after 30 years
 
U

User 463088

Banned
sangreal said:
Yes, but the debate is indeed being held there because the GOP reveres him

despite his terrible legacy as president, mind you

Regardless of what you think of him, it is funny that they can't move on after 30 years
Click to expand...

Oh, I loathe the "Ketchup is a Vegetable" Actor in Chief. Dude was a dick, and probably suffering from mental deterioration during his second term. Plus, dude was a poster child for illegal activity, but whatever. The way he handled the AIDS epidemic was repulsive.

I think the reason they host debates there frequently is because it's the largest Presidential library. They actually have room for a debate. I'm not sure Ws or HWs has the room for it. NOt that they'd want to be associated with either Bush.

That, and they generally believe he was the greatest Preisdent in history, who never raised taxes (he did) and who single handedly defeated communism with an American flag, bald eagle and a Bible.

I will give him the fact that he was charismatic as hell, though.
 
F

Fenderputty

Banned
SwiftDeath said:
I'm not sure we have enough data to determine if punching a fellow republican candidate in the live debate would lose you the debate. I mean imagine if that kind of thinking was to translate into your foreign policy.

"President FenderPutty: He's even willing to attack his allies to keep America safe!!!!"
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure Trump could punch Jeb in the face and probably gain from it.
 
A

akidnamededdy

Banned
sangreal said:
Yes, but the debate is indeed being held there because the GOP reveres him

despite his terrible legacy as president, mind you

Regardless of what you think of him, it is funny that they can't move on after 30 years
Click to expand...

I mean...maybe it's the only presidential library that could accommodate them? Or the other ones were booked for other events?

But yeah sure LMAO FUCKIN REAGAN
 
N

Netherscourge

Banned
Worst case scenario - Trump wins the nomination and taps her for his VP.

If she accepted, it would basically negate all of the sexism he's been practicing and grant him the undecided (or offended) woman voters.

Depends on how willing she is to basically ignore all of his horrible comments about women.
 
S

Slacker

Member
Changing the rules as you go, especially when the changes will specifically impact only one candidate, is pretty damn shady. But Fiorina in the debates will get people talking, and get better ratings. Democracy be damned, we gotta get paid.

I can't imagine how Santorum/Perry/the rest feel about this charade.
 
N

NeoXChaos

Member
adam387 said:
Oh, I loathe the "Ketchup is a Vegetable" Actor in Chief. Dude was a dick, and probably suffering from mental deterioration during his second term. Plus, dude was a poster child for illegal activity, but whatever. The way he handled the AIDS epidemic was repulsive.

I think the reason they host debates there frequently is because it's the largest Presidential library. They actually have room for a debate. I'm not sure Ws or HWs has the room for it. NOt that they'd want to be associated with either Bush.

That, and they generally believe he was the greatest Preisdent in history, who never raised taxes (he did) and who single handedly defeated communism with an American flag, bald eagle and a Bible.

I will give him the fact that he was charismatic as hell, though.
Click to expand...

Is there a Democratic equivalent to Reagan?
 
J

Joey Fox

Self-Actualized Member
Netherscourge said:
Worst case scenario - Trump wins the nomination and taps her for his VP.

If she accepted, it would basically negate all of the sexism he's been practicing and grant him the undecided (or offended) woman voters.

Depends on how willing she is to basically ignore all of his horrible comments about women.
Click to expand...

Women's health issues!
 
I

Inuhanyou

Believes Dragon Quest is a franchise managed by Sony
As entertainment, these GOP debates are the best kind. But its unfortunate that it takes up a significant portion of our political process and media attention instead of real issues.
 
U

User 463088

Banned
NeoXChaos said:
Is there a Democratic equivalent to Reagan?
Click to expand...

No. Part of being a Democrat means you live in the reality based community. We have Presidents we really, really liked, but we also admit that they had warts. Republicans love Reagan's 11th Commandment--never attack other Republicans. Unless they're Trump.....

The closest thing I'd say we had on the Dem side was FDR. We're still realistic, though.
 
H

HideyoshiJP

Member
B-Dubs said:
He won't need to. Dude can destroy her based on both of their business records alone. It's gonna be hilarious.
Click to expand...

The fact that she has only received $13,000 in donations from her former industry says a lot...
recode-tech-graph-copy.jpg
Click to expand...
In all fairness, though, most of their money is going to the guy who is trying to triple the H-1B visa cap.
 
N

NobleXenon

Member
Are they going to have the same number of people or are they going to have eleven? I thought each debate they would eliminate the lowest poll'd candidate.
 
F

Frozenprince

Banned
And yet they didn't do this last election cycle (and in fact constantly changed the rules so that he had to meet more and more impossible criteria) for Buddy Roemer. Who deserved to be let in.
 
B

boiled goose

good with gravy
sangreal said:
The rule they were using to exclude fiorina (relying on polls pre-first-debate) was dumb, but they're just going to expand to more than 10? or am I reading that wrong? would be even more dumb



aside from being a terrible business woman, she allegedly did well in the first kids-table debate -- or so the media tells us, since nobody watched it
Click to expand...

Fiorina is at least not insane. Dont know how corrupt she is compared to cruz, jeb, rubio, Walker, Christie
 
P

Perspicacity

Banned
NobleXenon said:
Are they going to have the same number of people or are they going to have eleven? I thought each debate they would eliminate the lowest poll'd candidate.
Click to expand...

It also depends on who is currently holding the immunity idol and who won the most points for their squad in that week's challenges, so we really aren't sure until CNN gives word.
 
A

antonz

Member
adam387 said:
No. Part of being a Democrat means you live in the reality based community. We have Presidents we really, really liked, but we also admit that they had warts. Republicans love Reagan's 11th Commandment--never attack other Republicans. Unless they're Trump.....

The closest thing I'd say we had on the Dem side was FDR. We're still realistic, though.
Click to expand...

Oh come on. FDR and Clinton both get Reagan style treatment.
 
S

Slacker

Member
antonz said:
Oh come on. FDR and Clinton both get Reagan style treatment.
Click to expand...

I don't think so. Ask literally every Republican you can find running for office if they're a "Reagan Republican." I'd be floored if even one person said they weren't. Meanwhile I've never heard anyone describe themselves as a "Clinton Democrat," including Hillary Clinton.
 
U

User 463088

Banned
antonz said:
Oh come on. FDR and Clinton both get Reagan style treatment.
Click to expand...

Oh no they don't, not even close.

Clinton and FDR were both very good Presidents, but they are still (rightfully) attacked for what they did wrong. Many on the left are happy to point out some of the mistakes Clinton made while President. When's the last time you heard a GOPper talk badly about Reagan?

There may be some rose colored glasses when it comes to Clinton, but it's no where close to how the GOP treats Reagan. It's not even in the same universe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

[GI.biz] Analysts offer predictions for 2023 in games
16
3K
Magic Carpet replied
CNN Healthcare Debate Townhall |OT| Graham,Cassidy vs Bernie, Klobuchar 9/25 9pm ET
2 3 4 5
240
28K
Inuhanyou replied
  • Poll
Biggest launch disasters of the generation
2
69
9K
Fuz replied
  • Locked
Politico: Only six GOP candidates likely to make next main debate stage
2
98
10K
Hyperactivity replied
  • Locked
CNN GOP debate line-up revealed, includes Carly Fiorina in main event
2 3
111
10K
Mimosa97 replied
Top Bottom