Wasn't bots also confirmed? I don't really see the point in not having an offline option then.
Haha, ok Ubisoft. I was on the fence about this one, but now it's a pretty easy decision to avoid.
Confirmed: Nestunt is not going to buy For Honor in order to vote with his wallet
Lionel Richie is doing the same thing.
Well said.I guess I'll try and respond to people who are dumbfounded at the fact that people are willing to drop For Honor over this news. I mean, it's been said on almost every page, explained various ways, but for whatever reason, it's not getting through. So lemme try.
First things first, finding out through a community manager is fucking dumb. Ubisoft should have released an official statement on this or spouted some PR in a letter, not gamers finding out because a dude on a forum asked about it. That's crazy, but only because this game was touted to have an offline campaign.
Like, we get it, things get cut, added, changed, whatever. But letting the consumer know is far better than having them suss it out like this.
On the topic of the campaign, Ubisoft was touting a fully fledged one. It's a multiplayer game, but with an actual sizeable single player mode attached (their words). So people can cut it out with that "ohh but it's a multiplayer game". Not even their words.
Not like a singleplayer campaign is a bad thing anyway. That's more sales for them if a person would pick it up for the campaign only. Maybe they enjoy the combat but don't want to play with others. People like me might trickle in and start messing around with the multi, finding out they might like it.
Server problems can happen at any time, and then the game becomes a coaster until shit is fixed. Ubisoft's track record isn't the greatest, and that's not including PSN/XBLA outages and people who don't have decent internet. There are far more of those people than you think.
For anti-cheat stuff, many games have done so for years without resorting to always online. For Honor isn't some special flower.
So, basically, it rubs people the wrong way. And that's fine. People have dropped games for much, much less, and much, much more. That's their right as a consumer, and nobody should tell them so long as the information isn't wrong.
Gamers aren't entitled because they aren't buying a product that doesn't serve them properly. That's hilariously silly. We are the consumer. We choose. And there's nothing wrong with making that choice. Even if some ex-Ubisoft guy wants to come up and play PR for them, the consumer isn't wrong in making a decision on this.
If it doesn't affect you, cool. Play on. But at least people are giving reasons. No need to get angry or despise them for choosing not to play.
Yes, but this is their typical lame excuse. Already heard it with Hitman.
As many new IP's are struggling these days, this certainly won't help.
Yeah, I loved the alpha, but I just don't get the rationale behind this. I guess it's to keep people from figuring out a way.to cheat for xp offline and bring it online? You would think they'd have a more pr friendly way of doing that
Exactly this. I was already on the fence but now ubi just pushed me off.
Like let's say I go to a relative's house out in the country and they don't have internet.... I can't play my shit? Fuck outta here Ubisoft
yep thats likely the hidden reason behin it ... aka monitore the players behaviour and "optimise" microtransactions around itOh, didn't realise Steep did this too. That had in-game-purchases, does For Honor have those too? I'm guessing a persistent internet connection is required for data gathering and analysis so the developers can further "optimise" the IAP for maximum profits (if you want to be cynical).
A single-player experience, should never, ever require any sort of internet connection. They didn't learn from history...Just unacceptable.
Yup, cut as well. They said they needed to focus on getting online co-op working properly. But who knows if that's still in there anymore.Does anyone know if split screen local multiplayer has been cancelled too? Because I read that split screen co op was shelved
Enjoy them saying you have to pay another 60 dollars if you want to continue playing the game cause now For Honor 2 is out so they are shutting the servers down for For Honor. Just buy 2 if you want to keep playing.
It's disgenuiius to pretend you think this is about not having internet to play the game. This is about the fact that this is a way for them to control how long you get to play the game. You're not paying for the game, you are payi for the rights to play it as long as they allow you to. And they aren't even going to tell you how long the rental is for either. It's whenever they decide to end it and they'll let you know when that time comes.
Didn't Battlefront sell in the realm of 15 million copies? Odd comparison, too, since that game didn't claim to have a campaign (and even the limited offline modes look like more than For Honor will have).Exactly! And I hope this tanks like a certain EA branded Star Wars multiplayer focused piece of shit.
Splitscreen has been cancelled altogether. When they used the word "co-op" they were talking about all modes rather than just the campaign.Sorry that I can't stand in solidarity with you guys, this game looks dope and been wanting it since september. Does anyone know if split screen local multiplayer has been cancelled too? Because I read that split screen co op was shelved
Enjoy them saying you have to pay another 60 dollars if you want to continue playing the game cause now For Honor 2 is out so they are shutting the servers down for For Honor. Just buy 2 if you want to keep playing.
It's disgenuiius to pretend you think this is about not having internet to play the game. This is about the fact that this is a way for them to control how long you get to play the game. You're not paying for the game, you are payi for the rights to play it as long as they allow you to. And they aren't even going to tell you how long the rental is for either. It's whenever they decide to end it and they'll let you know when that time comes.
Ugh, I'm always online but it's infuriating to hear a single player game requires internet always being on. And it's always about DRM. I don't care what the devs say.
Naive? Why would I stay with the first game when the sequel comes out, moving right quick.Quoted for visibility. Far too many clueless and naive people here.
The initial reveal was iirc all mp, sp wasn't shown much later.This was initially a multiplayer game that had a single player campaign added on to appease the "I won't buy a $60 multiplayer game" fans, right?
Or did it start out as a single player game and have multiplayer added on?
Sorry that I can't stand in solidarity with you guys, this game looks dope and been wanting it since september. Does anyone know if split screen local multiplayer has been cancelled too? Because I read that split screen co op was shelved
This was initially a multiplayer game that had a single player campaign added on to appease the "I won't buy a $60 multiplayer game" fans, right?
Or did it start out as a single player game and have multiplayer added on?
Games are not made to be consumed 20 years from now they are made to be consumed NOW. Sequels are made to keep the legacy going.
I'm mad because they said so many times that the campaign will be offline. Even their website saids so.
First Steep, now this. I expect AC to follow suit. Is Ghost Recon online only too?
Confirmed: I will buy an additional copy of For Honor to offset everyone in this thread that is no longer buying because of this.
I'm mad because they said so many times that the campaign will be offline. Even their website saids so.
just FYI the Technical Alpha has Denuvo aswell as always-on requiementThis is plain dumb & unneccesary.
Unless they're doing it for maximum sales and not having to use denuvo thus keeping away pirates. Then few months later just release it as drm-free.
Confirmed: I will buy an additional copy of For Honor to offset everyone in this thread that is no longer buying because of this.
not anymore they just updated their page and both uplay/steam storepages
just FYI the Technical Alpha has Denuvo aswell as always-on requiement
not anymore they just updated their page and both uplay/steam storepages
just FYI the Technical Alpha has Denuvo aswell as always-on requiement
Should we care? There are so many other consumer friendly games to spend our money on.
I'll take one please. Thanks
Well shit, you're right. Ubisoft have stealthily edited the 'about' to remove the word 'offline'. Fucking scumbags.
Well this is shit news to read.
So are they doing this in some kind of gotta-protect-the-integrity-of-the-paid-DLC kind of way? Or do they have a mandate to push an online-requirement wherever possible and are doing it just because they can?
Probably right, which is a shame.They will probably never provide you with any good explanation for this.
First Steep, now this. I expect AC to follow suit. Is Ghost Recon online only too?
If ghost recon is I'll wait for it drop to around $20 before purchase. By then their shit servers might be stable.
This will have next to no impact on the game's sales. It certainly will have no bearing on its success or failure.As many new IP's are struggling these days, this certainly won't help.