The guy who created the Titan One is the same guy who created the GamePadProxy, Cronus and CronusMAX. He had a falling out with the Cronus and CronusMAX groups, due to them not paying him, so he abandoned support on those 2 devices and created the Titan One. He basically allowed them to rebrand his device and sell it as their own, but that didn't work out very well, as he never got the money that he as promised. So he took some time, revamped the internal design, and added a lot of new features to it before releasing it again as the Titan One.
Hi jwm2, you seem to be involved with the Titan One somehow, so perhaps you could help with some confusion/concerns.
I just bought a Cronus Max recently with no idea of the history between the makers of it and anything really on the Titan One. All this backstory is news to me and quite frankly I feel like I'm caught with a product I'm not going to feel good about. However, if I hadn't bought a CM already, I wouldn't know which to choose. I want to be sure I'm backing the right horse here moving forward.
There's a lot of he-said/she-said, and some I'm not 100% sure who to believe, such as some language on both sites that come off rather poorly to customers that make me question how professional both sides are handling this, so I have a couple questions.
Regarding, the Titan One, although superficial, it's confusing that both it and the CronusMax website have the same template. Why exactly is that? Why don't you revamp it, because it's not at all clear to customers. It simply looks like a regional variant of the same product, and efforts to address the situation read like standard marketing posturing. I did find the legal page, but I doubt many will. It seems like the more distance between the products at first glance, even such as the website, the better.
Also, it seems clear that the Gtuner software being used by Cronus had been cracked/hacked by them and is being used as the official software for the product. I do not feel good about that at all. However, in a hypothetical situation where a previous employee left, taking the expertise and possibly not fulfilling contractual obligations, I could kinda see that being done in panic. What I'm curious about are the allegations of an employee leaving and taking code that was possibly legally signed over to a new employer/partner after a (perhaps ill-advised) non-compete agreement, and being used to develop a competing product. It that case, regardless of personal issues, there could actually be a legit claim by the company the employee left from. I think that's where I questioned whose story to believe. Such non-competes are common, and I could see someone get themselves in a bad situation and leave and potentially break that legal agreement with the intent of salvaging their work rather than seeing it in hands of those they had a falling out with. I guess I haven't read enough yet to know if that's what happened, and frankly I'd rather play games.
Any light shed on that would be appreciated. In general, this is still very clouded from a customer perspective, and it takes a lot of customer work to dig through all the legal stuff to have an unbiased take on all this. Frankly, it's not worth a potential customer's time, when it's easier to just get the one that's cheaper or on sale if it has the basic features. Hopefully whatever legal process being pursued clears this up, because I love the idea of the product in general, and want to recommend something to others.
Anyway, thanks for anything you can help with for some peace of mind here.