Ignoring the article's hyperbole for a moment: who is this console for? It costs about as much as a ps3 does nowadays, and it has a smaller library and can do less things. It's not a budget console like the OUYA, and its tech is not on par with the latest stuff.
Agree. Before the current gen came out, the tech journos wrote this gen would flop and would be the last console gen, but PS4 is on track to outsell PS2 as the highest selling console ever.
I wonder if this thing will even come close to Nvidia Shield performance
I hear motion control is going to be huge, guys.
"I think Apple rolls the console guys really easily." - Gabe Newell
Don't doubt Apple.
Can you do a console-style FPS without dual sticks? Touchpad + tilt controls? I think it'll be interesting.
The people who drank the apple flavored kool aid in this cult. Your points could be used for most apple products outside of software for the phone. They have a pretty good ecosystem in that regard. You could buy a windows laptop with better specs for half the price of the comparable apple product and have a much larger library of software available to you. People still buy Macbooks. When people put brands above all else these are the strange consumer decisions that are made. They make no logical sense but at least they look cool.
Or they just want a Macbook.
PS4 is on track to outsell PS2 as the highest selling console ever.
clickbait
What a cute article. Everyone and his grandma knows that if Apple is targeting any "gamers" at all with the new Apple TV, it's the casual market.
I do love Apple products, but
Jesus christ
It's amusing how angry some people are getting over this.
Has Apple been working with third party devs behind the scenes to get some for this thing?
I *do* think there's a still-vacant space that the Wii briefly occupied that could see a successor again, but the Wii required some serious killer-app software to take off the way it did. If it had supported 1080p and had best-in-class media-box support, Nintendo would've taken over the world (but it didn't).
Apple's likely to have all of those ingredients *except* for killer-app gaming software. I suspect they'll still do really well, but they won't be competing very directly with the XB1 or PS4 (and in fact high-end specialty devices generally don't get obliterated by lower-end broad-purpose devices - they may get eclipsed by their popularity but they don't actually have their own sales taken away).
The XB1 and PS4 at their current levels of success are quite well protected against something like the Apple TV or even against mobile gaming, but a lot of the *growth* in the next ten years will be in the latter sort of areas.
Read up on the concept of the innovator's dilemma.
I think both Sony and Microsoft saw this coming years ago. Hence the "TV, TV, TV" focus of the Xbox One and the bet on streaming by Sony. Maybe one day, PlayStation will be a streaming app you run on your Apple TV.
Roku is still the one to beat.
Ignoring the article's hyperbole for a moment: who is this console for? It costs about as much as a ps3 does nowadays, and it has a smaller library and can do less things. It's not a budget console like the OUYA, and its tech is not on par with the latest stuff.
Their ace in the hole is the Pippin virtual console
Roku is still the one to beat.
Roku is still the one to beat.
Looking at this graph it's pretty clear to me chromecast will have handily overtaken roku this year. I don't think roku has much of an international presence either.Roku is still the one to beat.