I'd love to participate in the reddit tournament, give me a holler!
Why I always have the dumbest players in my team?
Useful fact: If soul ring will give you more mana then you can have, it will temporarily raise your mana pool to make room for the excess.
Why I always have the dumbest players in my team?
I know this is not LoL, but... in Dota 2 or Dota, do we have a hero/skill/item that scales with mana? I haven't seen anything, just curious.
*goes back to accidentally stun creeps instead of heroes*
I've doing a lot of practice with the bots. Is it just me or is Crystal Maiden's AI set to feed? I swear every practice match I try out that has her has her death at 10+ with nearly no kills. Also is there a way to set bots?
Obsidian Destroyer is the only one I can think of
Played another game with Lich, which went very good. Didn't die until the end of the game. I was killed by Riki - I don't know yet how to use the dust properly, luckily the Riki player wasn't very good. I bought some, but when I used it, he wasn't around. If I hit him, he'll stay visible?
Then I tried Venomancer again, but I just don't get him. For me his attacks lack some impact. Its fun to see your enemies constantly loosing health, but I keep dying. He is so low on health and I'm harassed all the time + I have to get near to use the ulti.
Will concede/surrender be an option when the game is live?
I understand the point of the beta is primarily to test, and therefore long games are beneficial, but when the game is 30-5 25 minutes in, I'd rather get in another game before work than struggling for another 10-15 minutes since it seems like games last a long time even if it's "over".
If a significant number of games end prematurely for any reason, we believe its fundamentally unfulfilling for everyone.
There is a long post in the dev forums about this. All valve has said officially is:
I don't know, but I hope there is some kind of concede, even if it's there with serious restrictions. Otherwise in obvious slaughters people will just sit up in the fountain.
People sitting in fountains because they're getting smashed with 99.9 % chance of losing is also prematurely ending, it's just not made official and it wastes time for everyone involved.
Just makes it so that the vote requires 5/5 votes on all time (not decreasing like HoN) if anything, why force people to play it out if they don't want to...
People sitting in fountains because they're getting smashed with 99.9 % chance of losing is also prematurely ending, it's just not made official and it wastes time for everyone involved.
No 4 out of 5 means majority rules. Ef 5 out of 5 votes. In HoN most of the time you just have this one troll just voting no for the hell of it. Why should 4 other people suffer because of 1 troll?
I really don't see the controversy over a concede. Who are we protecting with keeping it out of the game? There are those games that turn around, but they are so far and few in between, and usually do to the other team just completely becoming idiotic/overconfident/bad end game heros. You could fit in two more wins in a time a drawn out loss could be.
It still counts as a loss, so if people are willing to have the ding against their record so let them.
There needs to be a concede feature, but I want it implemented so that people don't automatically give up at 15-20 minutes. I've had several games turn around that wouldn't have played out with a concede.
Why do you care if people give up at 15-20minutes? It's their choice, 4 out of 5 = majority rules, even if its the wrong decision and games theoretically turn around. 90% of the time they don't and its wasting everyones time.
People who think their time is being wasted are free to leave the game.
I've already had a situation in HoN where me (and 3 other teammates) thought the game was lost (we had just gotten annihilated to a Forsaken Archer) but the last person (Thorinbei!) refused to concede, saying we still had a chance.
We actually won the game. I think that's the sort of stuff Valve might be trying to prevent right now. A 5/5 concede system would not be optimal considering the possible trolls, but I'd rather take that that no concede system at all.
People who think their time is being wasted are free to leave the game.
Yes, and maybe one of the reasons you want to concede is because one guy in your team is afk.
Yes, and maybe one of the reasons you want to concede is because one guy in your team is afk.
Or purposely trolling, blatant feeding (running straight into enemy's base sorta crap).
Just report them and they get thrown into the leaver pool/banned.
Why do you care if people give up at 15-20minutes? It's their choice, 4 out of 5 = majority rules, even if its the wrong decision and games theoretically turn around. 90% of the time they don't and its wasting everyones time.
I care because I like long drawn-out really down to the wire games. You know, some of us actually enjoy the game even if we are seemingly losing.
5/5 at 15 minutes, 4/5 at 30. Not sure what comes after that.