Support NeoGAF

[Rynocirator]

This would be better but it makes it look like 17 is its own character lol

Put 17 behind 18 and use Janemba on 17's previous spot and we have a way better boxart.

This looks even worse

 

[Dark Ninja]

Looks like a low budget throwaway anime companion game

 

[Santar]

Just a few lazy examples on what can be done with just in game screenshots:

And one using official art: (Couldn't be bothered to remove part of Frieza )

 

[Diablohead]

Reminds me of Budokai 3

That looks so nasty compared to the pal box

 

[AwakenedCloud]

I don't mind it. It's probably the best they've done since Budokai Tenkaichi 2.

 

[shimon]

Generic AF.

 

[Adam M]

This would be better, game title above Bulma

 

[Kyleripman]

Looks okay to me. I don't really like the type where they cram in as many characters as possible.

 

[hellishimp]

Is there a huge difference between this game and the previous DB fighting games?

 

[Nikokuno]

Still better than 90% of DBZ PS2/PS3 games EU/US ever have so... Also quality of the drawing doesn't look half assed, colour grading is nice, putting SSJ2 is also cool. 8/10.

 

[FadedRevolution]

Is there a huge difference between this game and the previous DB fighting games?

This game is a 3v3 game closer to MVC2&3 and Guilty Gear/Persona 4. While previous games were 3d arena fighters/rpg

 

[Tal Shiar Agent]

Xenoverse 2 boxart on the other hand looks fantastic.

 

[Zalman]

Xenoverse 2 boxart on the other hand looks fantastic.

I hate this too. Goku looks awful and the two others are a weird selection of characters.

 

[Kain-Nosgoth]

this is bad, would have prefered something like this :

 

[Vaughngief]

Xenoverse 2 boxart on the other hand looks fantastic.

Bardock should be front and center. Especially since he's in the game more than Goku.

 

[Nikokuno]

Xenoverse 2 boxart on the other hand looks fantastic.

Fugly, I would have draw Goku better myself

 

[Mory Dunz]

dbz has such bad boxarts

 

[Anth0ny]

I dig the Budokai 3 tribute, but yeah... could be better.

 

[Durden77]

Honestly, it's pretty awful. Don't really get what people are saying about the Budokai 3 symbolism. It's much worse.

But Bamcom never knows how to make DBZ boxart. And the game looks amazing.

 

[Skullface]

Someone start a petition, this looks beyond awful.

Sanic! Good to see you're still. Thought I'd never have another opportunity to communicate with you. Those years leading up to the releaze of MGSV were pretty cool, huh?

But really, FighterZ looks like a highschool clipart project. I'd sign said petition.

 

[butman]

This one is way better:

 

[Jezan]

This one is way better:

Except for the faces of Goku, Gohan and 18.

But DBFZ cover is so...boring. Also the hair looks weird like if the problem they had with Goku's hair in the game is also present in the cover.

 

[BrunOz]

This one is way better:

layer style -> outer glow EVERYTHING

I like these:

 

[ffvorax]

>boxart on 2017

I'm more concerned about which Icon we will have on our console to start the game...

Spoiler

it's a gaf thread reference, yes

I will go digital probably anyway.

 

[Uthred]

Photoshop Filter Z, that cover is bad (well more shitty photoshop brushes Z but it doesnt work as well)

 

[Skullface]

layer style -> outer glow EVERYTHING

I like these:

Those box arts. Them memories. Reminds me of watching Toonami in the late 90's, discovering emulation for the first time on my family's Packard Bell.

 

[Takeru]

I like the design but it's far from the best box art.