I meant for revelations. Conquest and bright right seem right
They might have rebalanced revelations for the American release, they tend to do that stuff.
I meant for revelations. Conquest and bright right seem right
What version is about royal family or something?
revelations is the 3rd route meant to be played after playing the other 2 routes as it spoils alot of information.
Was Conquest too hard?
Maybe the translation is good. The biggest draw are the characters in my opinion.Yep But I don't understand de scores. Some maps are tedious and story is incredibly bad
It's hard for people that only played Awakening. Not surprising at all
Gamespot:
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/fire-emblem-fates-reviews/1100-6434849/
Birthright-8
Conquest-7
Revelations-9
Conquest got the lowest score on Gamespot.
Are you kidding me
Yeah, I understand that, but is it an entire game, as long as the other two? I always assumed it was a DLC expansion that wasn't nearly as long as the two "base" games.
Or reviews didn't need to all go up on Day 1
Yeah, I understand that, but is it an entire game, as long as the other two? I always assumed it was a DLC expansion that wasn't nearly as long as the two "base" games.
oh sorry, yet its an entire game, but remember its DLC so you need to have one of the other games to get it.
They both have royal families >.>
Yes they did. These sites aren't reviewing games to help you, they're reviewing games so you click their website and they make money.
They won't make much money with a Day 15 review.
Story is really bad and it's hard; not surprising.
Well if any indication. We got three good games here.
I'm happy.
It's not hard to see why they preferred Hoshido if you were watching how well they were playing the game on the stream!I'm so proud to be a member of #TeamHoshido right now.
Lol, someone told me once about the differences but I forgot
gotta find that thread I guess.
Gamespot:
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/fire-emblem-fates-reviews/1100-6434849/
Birthright-8
Conquest-7
Revelations-9
I think I heard 28 chapters each, though since a chapter can be of variable lengths that'll change things you. Plus casual and classic players will have significantly different play times due to the people restarting in classic when a character diesDoes anyone know the length for each of these? God knows I don't have time to complete 3 separate RPGs.
Birthright 9.4Here is the correct link for the IGN birthright review http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/02/17/fire-emblem-fates-birthright-review
Man that $80 edition with it all on a single cartridge sounds amazing. Shame it's sold out.
Nice reviews all around but I guess is expected considering how improved everything is and now to wait for my Birthright copy of the game to arrive...
Does anyone know the length for each of these? God knows I don't have time to complete 3 separate RPGs.
It's not hard to see why they preferred Hoshido if you were watching how well they were playing the game on the stream!
The Conquest review is curious the little snippit they put for the review largely just states that he enjoyed the game and its difficulty but wanted to spend more time with his army and characters but because of the way its designed he didn't feel he could do that.
In other words he wanted it to be more like Birthright, which I find confusing because the entire point of Conquest is that its more like a traditional FE game so if you knew that going into it why would that be your complaint or why would you review it in that way. Maybe its me but it sounds like he was going to be disapointed from the start because he wasn't reviewing Birthright or maybe thats just what they could fit in the little snippit and he had a better explaination... I don't really care about the score itself I just found the reasoning somewhat confusing.
The three versions aren't even reviewed by the same person. That seems like an incredibly weird choice when you're trying to decide between them.
April, sadly. No idea about why such a delay though.When is this out in Europe?
Ha, good point. However, Kotaku claims they do make money, even on late reviews
That aside, I'm normally 100% fine with day 1 reviews, but it feels inadequate in this case
The reviewer also griped about not being able to spend as much time with the characters, as the game does have a more linear setup. Something to keep in mind for people who enjoyed the character focus of Awakening and what sounds like is better fulfilled by both Birthright and Revelations.
It makes sense, that's the whole reason Awakening (and to some extent, Sacred Stones) implemented a world map and the ability to grind in the first place: so that you could always keep your favorite units, even if they were under leveled. Almost every change in Awakening was designed to keep all units at maximum availability. That's why you could change classes so freely in that game: You could simply make your favorite character into a class that better suited your needs.
So, if the draw in awakening was this availability, losing it in conquest would be disappointing. It's not about knowing what you're getting beforehand, it's that one game is less enjoyable than the others because it lacks something you enjoy.
April, sadly. No idea about why such a delay though.
Any news on EU release?
Since when does the EU have a release date?!
There are three games? WHAT?!
Which one do I go with if I want more Awakening?
BirthrightThere are three games? WHAT?!
Which one do I go with if I want more Awakening?