Because the cost of a Core M chip is almost $300.
No one has, because it was just announced 3 days ago.
Wait what. Is this new?
Intel stick computer has been arond for awhile. It uses atom.
Because the cost of a Core M chip is almost $300.
No one has, because it was just announced 3 days ago.
Wait what. Is this new?
Intel stick computer has been arond for awhile. It uses atom.
Huh..
Looks kind of exactly like this monstrosity with minimally rounder edges (design)
Having a x86(?) platform is nice for gaming and computing in general I guess
Edit: Here's a pic
I need this so badly
Atom x5 is pretty capable at lower res. At 540p, it would be terrific. Able to run Mass Effect 3 or Tomb Raider 2013 at Xbox 360 quality.
I'de like to see a core M
I mean they can fit one in this thing.
Why not a larger handheld?
I'm fairly sure 540p is below the minimum required resolution for non-mobile Windows 10 (if I recall correctly, the minimum is 800x600).Atom x5 is pretty capable at lower res. At 540p, it would be terrific. Able to run Mass Effect 3 or Tomb Raider 2013 at Xbox 360 quality.
One of the things that lower-end devices have shown is that some games are way better at scaling down to minimal hardware than others. I guess it's possible that RE4 isn't one of the better games for that, for whatever reason.My surface 3 couldnt run RE4 at 30fps, @720p on low .
My surface 3 couldnt run RE4 at 30fps, @720p on low .
Pretty annoying how it takes a Chinese knockoff company to make something like this. Why did Sony abandon the Vaio-P form factor? I'll never understand why I can't put a full Windows device in my pocket. That's seriously something I've wanted for over 10 years and with today's tech it doesn't seem like it would be difficult at all to achieve.
Microsoft is worried about their mobile phone division failing when in reality all they need to do is put actual Windows and an Intel chip in there. The only platform that can compete with Apple's App Store is Windows with legacy apps.
Starcraft on my phone > Candy Crush.
I love the idea and it's something I've always wanted since I saw that "99$ tablet runs crisis" thread
Something I'd personally prefer though would be indented thumbsticks.
I hated the thumbsticks on the DS3 so when the DS4 came out with indented thumbsticks it immediately became my primary game pad for playing games on PC.
That's all I'd ever need really. Heck a really basic handheld windows PC that's only capable to play small indies would be something I'd consider. Low res pixel art is better on a small screen.Well, the latest of AAA releases probably won't run very well if at all on this, but i'm perfectly fine if this plays indie games + AAA games at decent settings from 2012 and earlier.
They were talking in the dingoonity thread about axing the keyboard from the device.
I can't stress enough how much this device REQUIRES a keyboard. Please don't kill it before it gets off the ground.
You know the 360 controller has existed for the last decade yeah?
At the very least, hotkeys.Why does it need a keyboad? It's not like you can play game using a keyboard of that size.
At the very least, hotkeys.
Gamepad would be fine if you were only playing console ports, but tons of PC exclusives REQUIRE a keyboard.
Device is DOA without one.
Ideally it would a hacked up steam controller. That would be awesome.Depends which PC exclusives. But I agree, the keyboard would be a neat addition. Even though, it doesnt have to eat up space that could be used for battery or for hardware power (heat dissipation)
That keyboard model in the OP looks incredibly cumbersome and uncomfortable to hold, let alone game with.
Depends which PC exclusives. But I agree, the keyboard would be a neat addition. Even though, it doesnt have to eat up space that could be used for battery or for hardware power (heat dissipation)
Maybe a small fan, like the Shield, would keep it from throttling. Even a little extra bulk is fine with me.Yeah, any device that has the Intel Atom X5-Z8500 with no design to dissipate heat tends to throttle hard, I hope GDP will design the handheld with that in mind.
We'll have to wait and see, but unless I can run at least Windows XP/Vista level applications I won't be impressed.Isn't this what the rumoured Surface Phone is going to be?
You forgot to add:I had no idea this existed. Awesome! Wish list:
-analog sticks in low alignment
-no physical keyboard. Allow Bluetooth keyboard accessory
-Full Steam support
-8GB RAM and 3.0+ GHz
-higher end graphics card
-no kickstand (plenty of cases have try these if desired)
-Screen over 6.5", OLED preferred
-Android mode
These keys look fairly small, but it looks similar to a sidekick or blackberry. This would be nice for emulators, but what else would be playable on it? With the screen so small, text in most games would probably be unreadable. With that said, I'd love a portable gaming device that runs Windows. I loved the Dingoo, but it was too underpowered.
Thoughts?
Awesome!Atom x5 is pretty capable at lower res. At 540p, it would be terrific. Able to run Mass Effect 3 or Tomb Raider 2013 at Xbox 360 quality.
Ideally it would a hacked up steam controller. That would be awesome.
Depends on the size of it really. It does look that the sticks are a bit too much to the inside, but depending on the size that isn't really a issue. Anyways, that's just a preliminary concept.
Why this if you can have a Pandora instead?
Because Pandoras are no longer made, are ridiculously expensive, and have very weak specs.
The clamshell design with a keyboard is what I'm looking for though. A baytrail atom in this form factor is my dream portable.
People asking for no keyboard are crazy, and only limiting the device.
Why this if you can have a Pandora instead?
The spiritual successor to Pandora with better specs (called Pyra) is on track to be released sometime early this year at around 500 EUR. It's going to be ARM (running Linux), not x86, so this will at first not be interesting for those looking for a Steam handheld (unless you are willing to take the performance hit from x86 emulation+WINE).
But: the interesting thing is this: The SOC (and only the SOC) of the Pyra is on a separate board, so in theory (we will see how this actually pans out) it could be upgraded or replaced by a x86 SOC in the future while keeping everything else (case, screen, battery, keyboard, etc.).
Main page: http://pyra-handheld.com
FAQ: https://pyra-handheld.com/boards/threads/faq-dragonbox-pyra.75902/
Because Pandoras are no longer made, are ridiculously expensive, and have very weak specs.
The clamshell design with a keyboard is what I'm looking for though. A baytrail atom in this form factor is my dream portable.
People asking for no keyboard are crazy, and only limiting the device.
Because I payed $500 for one and never got it.
Sure, it's fine for snes emulation and back, but it severely lacks power for basically anything else (gaming and otherwise).A friend of mine has one, I tried it with several older games (thanks emulation) and it was pretty cool. If I was still into handheld gaming, I definitely would have bought one.
Sure, it's fine for snes emulation and back, but it severely lacks power for basically anything else (gaming and otherwise).
PSX emulation on pandora was superb.
I remember it was even able to do Dreamcast to some extent.
It was an amazing handheld but for way too much money than I was ever willing to spend. Pyra seems to be going down the same road but it's kinda sad that its specs don't look so great. I think tech is just advancing too quickly for a small project like Pyra to keep up. Someone will always be able to make a better device before the Pyra guys can design it.
I wish them the best of luck though, if I could scrape together the money and justify the price I would get one.