Hey RGM79,
What do you think of this X99 build?
PCPartPicker part list /
Price breakdown by merchant
CPU: Intel Core i7-5930K 3.5GHz 6-Core Processor ($799.00 @ CPL Online)
CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-U12S 55.0 CFM CPU Cooler ($85.00 @ IJK)
Motherboard: ASRock Fatal1ty X99M Killer Micro ATX LGA2011-3 Motherboard ($329.00 @ PCCaseGear)
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws Series 16GB (4 x 4GB) DDR4-2400 Memory ($304.00 @ IJK)
Storage: Crucial MX100 256GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($149.00 @ PCCaseGear)
Storage: Toshiba 3TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($130.00 @ IJK)
Video Card: MSI GeForce GTX 970 4GB Twin Frozr V Video Card ($519.00 @ CPL Online)
Case: Silverstone TJ08B-E MicroATX Mini Tower Case ($109.00 @ CPL Online)
Power Supply: XFX XTR 850W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply ($195.00 @ CPL Online)
Optical Drive: Pioneer BDR-209DBK Blu-Ray/DVD/CD Writer ($82.00 @ IJK)
Sound Card: Asus Xonar Essence STX 24-bit 192 KHz Sound Card ($209.00 @ PCCaseGear)
Mouse: SteelSeries Rival Wired Optical Mouse ($65.00 @ CPL Online)
Total: $2975.00
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2015-04-01 21:54 EST+1100
Both the CPU and mobo are really the only ones on sale so you can basically take 20% the price listed there. I will purchase the RAM somewhere else. So just a few more questions:
Are you confident that something like this will last me 7 years (at least processor-wise)? That would be amazing (my Q6600 is struggling a fair bit for a while now). I'm happy with 5 years as it is.
What RAM speed do you recommend? I kinda of picked 2400 out of thin air as it looked to be in my price range and was popular.
Do you think it's a good idea for me to still stick with mATX or do you recommend I go ATX. The next mobo up is ASRock X99 Extreme4. Will I have any issues with noise or cooling?
Do you think I should get a new monitor now? I'm looking for something with 144hz and Gsync (in that priority). Is there new tech among the horizon that I should wait for? I'm perfectly fine using my old 22" 1080p monitor at the moment.
Overall, I'm in agreement with Liljoka's sentiments. I'll revise your build for you, and list reasons why I changed parts under the new build list.
PCPartPicker part list /
Price breakdown by merchant
CPU: Intel Core i7-5820K 3.3GHz 6-Core Processor ($529.00 @ CPL Online)
CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D14 SE2011 CPU Cooler ($92.00 @ CPL Online)
Motherboard: ASRock Fatal1ty X99M Killer Micro ATX LGA2011-3 Motherboard ($329.00 @ PCCaseGear)
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws Series 16GB (4 x 4GB) DDR4-2666 Memory ($331.00 @ IJK)
Storage: Crucial MX100 256GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($149.00 @ PCCaseGear)
Storage: Toshiba 3TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($130.00 @ IJK)
Video Card: EVGA GeForce GTX 980 4GB ACX 2.0 Video Card ($779.00 @ CPL Online)
Case: Silverstone TJ08B-E MicroATX Mini Tower Case ($109.00 @ CPL Online)
Power Supply: EVGA 750W 80+ Bronze Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply ($115.00 @ CPL Online)
Optical Drive: Pioneer BDC-207DBK Blu-Ray Reader, DVD/CD Writer ($56.00 @ CPL Online)
Sound Card: Asus Xonar Essence STX 24-bit 192 KHz Sound Card ($209.00 @ PCCaseGear)
Mouse: SteelSeries Rival Wired Optical Mouse ($65.00 @ CPL Online)
Total: $2893.00
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2015-04-02 07:35 EST+1100
When considering price to performance, I'd opt for the cheaper 5820K instead of the 5930K.
They are nearly the same aside from a tiny 0.2GHz clock speed difference and the 5930K having more robust support for triple/quad graphics cards.
For a few dollars more, the dual tower
Noctua NH-D14 ($92) will be
more effective than the single tower NH-U12S even when using low noise and fan speed adaptors.
I'd opt for 2666MHz RAM, it's a bit more forward looking than 2400MHz and despite costing $30 more, will fit in your build easily after the price savings with the other parts.
The graphics card is a tougher issue to tackle. I wouldn't go for the GTX 970 now after the 3.5GB memory issue came to light, although it is currently still a great card for 1080p gaming. The issue is that in the future, games may go over the 3.5GB VRAM usage and then the GTX 970 wouldn't perform very well, making it a bit of a risky long term investment for gaming, especially at higher resolutions that will take up more VRAM. I put a GTX 980 in there as a placeholder for now. It looks like you have a few choices here:
1. Instead of the GTX 970, I'd recommend something like the
R9 290/290X 4GB models ($380~500) which don't have any memory issues and will be perfectly fine at high-ish settings at 1080p for the next few years. The AMD cards are well priced for their
performance which isn't too far from the GTX 970. There's enough money left in your budget to get two R9 290X cards which would perform exceedingly well at 1080p and pretty well at 1440p. That said, not all games work with twin graphic cards, and not all scale well (two graphics cards doesn't mean twice the performance). I'd also recommend the 850 watt power supply listed below if you want to go that route as the R9 290/290X are more power hungry than the GTX 970/980.
2. Go with a single
GTX 980 (~$700). Greater performance than any other single graphics card (except Titan X and R9 295X2), but the performance isn't THAT big of an increase over the
GTX 970 or
R9 290X. Not so great when you consider price to performance, but a single graphics card does offer more reliable framerate and less heat/power issues than twin graphics cards. The GTX 980 is also a great overclocker for good gains of
up to 20% more performance according to
HardOCP and
Anandtech. In the future you'd also have the option of picking up a second GTX 980, maybe after a price drop.
3. Wait for the new AMD R9 3XX line which according to rumors is due to be released around June. Even if you don't prefer AMD, Nvidia
may respond to the new R9 390X by cutting the GTX 980's price or announcing a higher end graphics card (the GM200-cut or the so-called GTX 980 Ti).
$200 for the XFX power supply is really expensive and 850 watts is a bit excessive for your needs.
For even twin GTX 980s, you still only need 750 watts and 750 watts will probably be enough for any future single graphics card. I found the
EVGA Supernova G2 750 watt model ($145) to substitute into your build for the same level of quality, it is also gold rated and fully modular. If you want to save even more money, there is the
EVGA Supernova B2 750 watt model ($115) instead which is bronze rated and semi-modular,
but no less worse when it comes to quality. If you really want 850 watts for the future, then consider the
EVGA Supernova G2 850 watt model ($175) which is still cheaper than the XFX.
If you want a blu-ray drive just for watching movies, then you can save some money with the slightly lower end
Pioneer BDC-207DBK ($56) which only reads blu-ray discs and does not write to them. Both of those drives do not come with blu-ray movie player software, you will either need to use this
free VLC addon or
buy playback software.
Now, onto your questions:
Yeah, I'm more or less confident that the processor can stretch to 7 years, especially with some overclocking which you can do later a few years down the line. To put the Intel enthusiast i7 line into perspective, we have people coming into this thread with the
7 year old i7 920 processor who are looking for new PCs
now. The i7 920 was the entry level enthusiast processor back then 7 years ago, like the 5820K processor is now. Of course, after 5 years you can upgrade sooner if you like, seeing how long this PC lasts you. Edit: Mkenyon is right about the i7 4790K also being an option. I still think it's silly to spend around $3000 AUD on an i5 4690K build, but a i7 4790K build would be OK if you were looking to maximize your budget for graphics cards like twin future R9 390X or 980 Ti, just not as futureproof due to DDR3, but I suppose performance wise it's fine for the money.
I feel that 2400MHz is somewhat lower end for DDR4, it's only one step above the entry level 2133MHz and considering that in the future higher speed RAM usually becomes cheaper, I usually try to recommend 2666MHz or better when considering that in the future you
may add more RAM, although most users currently rarely need more than 16GB. I'm thinking that way to avoid future scenarios like when we have people in this thread with older 1333MHz DDR3 RAM wondering if they should just add same speed RAM or replace all of their old slower RAM with new faster RAM. In all honesty, the performance impact in real life daily use is not that much, so you can go for the cheaper 2400MHz if you life.
As for the motherboard and case size, you said you were interested in portability, so mATX would be preferred if you needed to move the PC around a lot. It does limit future expandability, but you should be able to fit twin graphics cards on that motherboard as well as the sound card, you would need to install the sound card in the middle slot.
I'd hold on to the 1080p monitor for now if you don't have any issues with it, but that's just me, I've never used a 1440p or better display.
Whew, that was a longer post than I usually make. Hope it's not too overbearing.
Edit:
Here's what the i7 4790K based build would look like.