Edit: Could "Soul Hackers" possible be the Devil Summoner game?
It is but it's not a Wii U game.
Edit: Could "Soul Hackers" possible be the Devil Summoner game?
It is but it's not a Wii U game.
Honestly, it just looks like thread titles. Especially since some of them are weird like "Resident Evils". It's probably a test forum for miiverse. Someone just made a speculation thread called "Yoshi's Land Wii U".
I like the new games idea better.Honestly, it just looks like thread titles. Especially since some of them are weird like "Resident Evils". It's probably a test forum for miiverse. Someone just made a speculation thread called "Yoshi's Land Wii U".
Trike now needs a worthy gaf title!
HOLY SHIT! :O
holy shit
HOLY SHIT! :O
Honestly, it just looks like thread titles. Especially since some of them are weird like "Resident Evils". It's probably a test forum for miiverse. Someone just made a speculation thread called "Yoshi's Land Wii U".
Just read some of the earlier posts. Damn! :|HOLY SHIT INDEED
we got nothing out of this
holy shit
Man, Reggie creeped me out before all the close ups and gifs...
Do we know if Trike is still alive?
I know right?
Trike somehow managed to (supposedly) access the debug menu of the WiiU by some simple way of interacting with the Miiverse. Once inside, he found admin account information as well as a list of unannounced games for the WiiU. However, it is speculated that the names are simply there from an earlier stage in development to fill in fields on pages.Is there a recap for this thread?
Either he's the luckiest bullshitter ever or this is amazingAround this time, the Miiverse went down, and Nintendo patched it on the fly. Trike was locked out, and people began demanding he be given a tag.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=44495504&postcount=829Either he's the luckiest bullshitter ever or this is amazing
What a great ride, even if all the leaks are fake (which unfortunately they almost assuredly are).
What a great ride, even if all the leaks are fake (which unfortunately they almost assuredly are).
No way those titles are fake. You don't just accidentally titles like that.
Due to the way in which digital images are presented when you take pictures of them, it's hard to know for certain what that data intends. What is most interesting about the debug menu picture is that all the metadata is intact (http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=b77c39a4695326b21ec2b0cfcc6a394f90d66b0e.671938). This isn't super difficult to fake, but it's often one of the first things that's looked over when doing something like Photoshopping, since when one is intentionally trying to deceive using images, the image is often reconstructed to look authentic, and minor details (like metadata) are often missed. The fact that the metadata is fairly exhaustive is a good indicator that the images are not fake. Upload an image that was created via Photoshop or originated as a piece of art on the web and you'll see. Metadata is of course just the first step, but it's often the easiest to discern actual photos from creations. The two images you linked actually show examples of this, where the second image shows a compressed, modified image and the first is unmodified (though in this case, due to the refraction of light, I would still likely say both images are authentic, the second is simply resized). The grid impression of the images implies that both images were likely initially saved (or compressed as) JPEG images.http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=b77c39a4695326b21ec2b0cfcc6a394f90d66b0e.671938
compare to
http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=af38fd77a7b4bbe4fbdebe24f24c3e2bffe5148e.36404
(Disclaimer: I do not know how to properly use this tool.)
No way those titles are fake. You don't just accidentally titles like that.
omgRetro making Yoshi Land, sequel to yoshis island, in beautiful hand drawn hd. Believe.
I tried to delete everything. Didn't work? I dunno. I added myself as a regional admin. Don't know if that went through either. Messing around on there I did find some curious messages by Yoshiomi Kurisu. That is who hatena-chris is.
First message is dated 2012/12/01 09:30:00: WiiU will be released tomorrow!
Second messaged is dated 2012/12/10 09:30:00: Big titles will be released this weekend, so there are more messages on Miiverse.
Good news will be confirmed for those who are wanting a new Yoshi console game in about five minutes.
Edit: and possibly Metal Gear Solid.
I uploaded the pictures. Sorry for the lateness, imgur didn't work, so I went with another host.
That isn't the one I clicked though. I should probably try anyway.
(Images added to OP)
Okay, so it turns out that the ZELDAAA comments on the right are the comments for all of the different sub-forums. I think they are just testing them. BTW, all of those titles are in the "US / English / Games for Teenagers and Kids" section. Which is supposed to launch on December 20th,2012. So maybe the December 10th reveal will confirm this information.
Also a certain developer that I greatly respect PM'd me saying that I might get into some legal trouble or jailtime with Nintendo for this. LawyerGAF wanna help me out?
Due to the way in which digital images are presented when you take pictures of them, it's hard to know for certain what that data intends. What is most interesting about the debug menu picture is that all the metadata is intact (http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=b77c39a4695326b21ec2b0cfcc6a394f90d66b0e.671938). This isn't super difficult to fake, but it's often one of the first things that's looked over when doing something like Photoshopping, since when one is intentionally trying to deceive using images, the image is often reconstructed to look authentic, and minor details (like metadata) are often missed. The fact that the metadata is fairly exhaustive is a good indicator that the images are not fake. Upload an image that was created via Photoshop or originated as a piece of art on the web and you'll see. Metadata is of course just the first step, but it's often the easiest to discern actual photos from creations. The two images you linked actually show examples of this, where the second image shows a compressed, modified image and the first is unmodified (though in this case, due to the refraction of light, I would still likely say both images are authentic, the second is simply resized). The grid impression of the images implies that both images were likely initially saved (or compressed as) JPEG images.
Algorithmically it appears as a photo of digital objects, which will appear as digital even in a photograph, due to how computer screens make-up image compositions. Once again, the other reality is that even opening an image in Photoshop does make modifications to it (as it has an image conversion process the same as any image editing program, same as GIMP and other image editors). If you've ever opened an image that looks fine in Photoshop but wrong in a program like GIMP, this is why. There can be any number of reasons for this, from compression levels to gzip functionality. Saving an image using any of these programs will modify the way the image looks, it's a simple reality of image compression, especially if you save the image as a JPEG and not a PNG, TGA, or BMP.