GrizzleBoy
Banned
That was kind of a blunt statement that I should have probably left out or clarified more. Its not so much a disagreement with the protest against police brutality as much as I have an issue with both sides of this issue. One side seems to claim that every time an officer shoots a person of color, that its racially motivated or is a symptom of systematic oppression regardless of circumstances; the other side seems to side with the officer every single time, again, regardless of circumstances. From where I stand, it seems that many people on both sides of this issue dont have much of an interest in discussing this issue with any sort of honesty about it, which seems to prevent any kind of progress. I also believe that the flag should be respected as a symbol of American values and freedoms but my feelings have no bearing (nor should they) on the law or what these players are well within their rights to express.
Honestly, its probably wrong of me to associate the entire NFL kneeling protests to any kind of specific viewpoint on the issue without hearing from those participating specifically, but whenever these issues come up, people seem to dig into the trenches of whatever side they are on and stick to their narrative despite what the facts might suggest.
But again, regardless of how I feel, they are absolutely within their rights to be doing what they are doing. Although I dont agree with any such decisions, this also means that teams are in their rights to fire players and people to boycott the NFL in response.
What was the other side of the Castille/Tamir Rice/Trayvon Martin shootings, the "I cant breathe" choking to death and many recent studies showing entire police departments being systematically racist?
What part of the non police backing side is lacking honesty in these cases?
What is the "other side" of generally not wanting poorly trained and or racially biased officers accidentally murdering people?
What is the "other side" of not being happy with frequently falsified police reports, planted evidence and such?
I don't think your post really addresses why you don't agree with protest other than to slightly imply that theres some greater truth that needs to be accepted by both sides regarding these incidents and some sort of "why does it always have to be about race?" Argument.
You say that you have a problem with one side suggesting that every shooting of a minority is racially charged, when police are killing shit loads of people day in day out, and when the protests mainly come about in circumstances when people are killed for no reason or "just incase".
I don't know.
It's just weird that you have people out here raising awareness about what most non American western world citizens would call a joke of a corrupt and unregulated pseudo military with a license to kill that nobody should want to have in their country, and the response to that raising of awareness is that there's too much of a racial element to it and "why does it always have to be about race".