Thanks for the rundown, I just got a copy of the complaint myself and had been poring over it when you wrote your summary.
Counts 1 and 6-10, and 10 again are pretty weak and boil down to "Jim said things we didn't like" or "Jim said something but then we changed it so now he's wrong". 6 and 7, the two Per Quod libels, are laughably bad and they should be ashamed for putting those in a legal filing. "mob or mob family" indeed, LOL.
The "Incident Causing Lost Product Damage", to me, is the most interesting part because we had no idea that Steam was actively breathing down Digital Homicide's neck due to the Jimquisition videos. To the point that Steam was going to delist everything DH had done, plus essentially ban them. The problem with this segment, as Jim's video from the other day shows, is that apparently DH is able to dump stuff back on Greenlight again. Maybe they ended up with just a suspension, but regardless the fact that they have product currently listed on Greenlight pretty much deep sixes this whole line of argument.
Counts 2-5, the ones that cover the portion of the kerfluffle regarding ECC Games out of Poland, this part they might actually have a small bit of room to stand on. Problem is, their evidence is crap. The idea of submitting random screenshots of websites as evidence should be making Jim's lawyer giggle with glee.
I fully expect that you'll be right, and whatever Federal judge has the bad luck to draw this case will take one look through the complaint and throw it right back in Digital Homicide's face. The Federal bench has a notorious lack of humor.