MilkyJoe
Member
Because Nintendo is not a tech company and it would be pure suicide to enter a market consisting of Apple, Samsung, LG and more.
And let's not forget touch screen sucks for 99% of games
Because Nintendo is not a tech company and it would be pure suicide to enter a market consisting of Apple, Samsung, LG and more.
Eh I don't really think it's happening but that was on Verendus list of crazy predictions and people seemed to really take his word. I dont see it happening personally.
Narrowing your field of vision in Mario Kart by including racer info of 12 players on the left, and a map on the right. Yeah that is possible but not viable.
ah I hadn't heard of that. seems like a good pr move for sony, but maybe a difficult choice for capcom.
I don't remember Verendus' list talking about regular MonHun getting on PS4. His lists are usually vague enough that he just meant the MonHun IP, and thus, Frontier 2.
We live in the age of HD screens though, and as someone who works on stuff in his free time you can put a ton of information on a 1920x1080 space without intereferring with the game.
BTW, even F-Zero GX did this on a 4:3 aspect ratio and that game - which requires more skill than Mario Kart - was perfectly playable on one screen.
We live in the age of HD screens though, and as someone who works on stuff in his free time you can put a ton of information on a 1920x1080 space without intereferring with the game.
BTW, even F-Zero GX did this on a 4:3 aspect ratio and that game - which requires more skill than Mario Kart - was perfectly playable on one screen.
It'll be another Nintendo-only console. Fine, but it better not cost more than $199.
Nothing on 3DS comes close to the likes of Starfox Adventures, Rogue Leader or Metroid Prime.Not really. The highest end 3DS games are easily comparable. Monster Hunter 4 is visually superior to Tri.
Portable games tend to be low budget so the average 3DS doesn't show it's potential at all.
so all that stuff i have been saying about the NX being a way to recoup losses on the wii u project seems to be kind of on the money. man, people will be angry when they find out the handheld is probably wii u levels and the home variant may be only slightly better at best. if the project works out for them though, they can actually have more freedom when it comes to hardware and upgrades.
Think about the Sony offerings on PS1 and 2 (Cardinal Syn! Fantavision! Extermination!) or the Microsoft offerings on the first Xbox (outside of Halo) or towards the end of the life of the 360.
And how much effect did Killzone Shadowfall or Knack have on PS4's success really?
I don't think first party matters much at all in console success. In terms of importance, they are hardly more important than third party games... though they have the benefit of being automatically exclusive.
Nintendo wouldn't have to change... they're already at the top of the first party game.
They'd have to get into the business of moneyhatting exclusives, though..
Seems like they learned nothing from wii U.
maybe. square enix didn't do a third dqm remake, but they did poet x and are porting viii. not sure if dqh counts as Sony gaining exclusivity or square enix preparing the platform for a dq as well, since it's possible dqxi could be multiplatform.Well they seemed to have snatched DQ so I guess it isn't that unlikely. Pretty much says everything about how shit Nintendo's third party relations are.
Seems like they learned nothing from wii U.
Suposedly, this time they will learn how to more easily port games from portable to home console, and other way around. They are doubling down on Nintendo-produced software it seems.
So there is that.
We live in the age of HD screens though, and as someone who works on stuff in his free time you can put a ton of information on a 1920x1080 space without intereferring with the game.
BTW, even F-Zero GX did this on a 4:3 aspect ratio and that game - which requires more skill than Mario Kart - was perfectly playable on one screen.
bad example IMO. that overlay definitely wouldn't fly today. way too huge and dumb. we just ha to put up with it back then due to power and rez. it was perfectly playable the way a Vita is playable in sunlight: it was, but hardly ideal
Off course its possible, but it would look much cooler with just the game on the screen.
bad example IMO. that overlay definitely wouldn't fly today. way too huge and dumb. we just ha to put up with it back then due to power and rez. it was perfectly playable the way a Vita is playable in sunlight: it was, but hardly ideal
The thing is, third parties wouldn't bother even if it was on par. The audience isn't there. It'd be a waste of time and money unless they create bespoke titles for the Nintendo audience. And why bother spending time and money doing this when they can develop one title across 2-3 other platforms?
I don't understand why people think this. There is not some clear divide between Nintendo fans and 'other gamers'. Tons of people love games of all kinds, including Nintendo games.The thing is, third parties wouldn't bother even if it was on par. The audience isn't there. It'd be a waste of time and money unless they create bespoke titles for the Nintendo audience
Exactly. An affordable platform with almost all of Nintendos new releases on it. No more split between two hardware iterations. So what does this mean? It means Nintendo can support its own hardware without software droughts. Thats the main focus behind NX. Creating a platform like iOS where the library is only expanding and not reset to zero every few years.
Power slightly less than xbox one levels I presume. Nintendo are aiming cheap. Unifying platforms and getting mobile into it.
They are aiming for impulse buy price range $199 or less. Core gamers can purchase at cheap price as secondary console without having to pay too much and casuals/parents will have the lure of mobile/indie scene to provide cheap alternative.
Nothing on 3DS comes close to the likes of Starfox Adventures, Rogue Leader or Metroid Prime.
I'm SHOCKED.
Sure, but you see where 'being cool' has led the Wii U to.
Well of course it wouldn't fly today since we have an entriely different aspect ratio to work with; this was over a decade ago. You are completely missing my point here.
I think the NX could sell well if priced well below the competition (~$200) and if they had 2-3 exclusive games on launch. It would be a huge win if one of those launch games was a 3rd party exclusive. If the NX is similar in architecture and performance to the Xbox and PS4 then porting to the NX would be a no brainer since the sales would more than make up for the cost to port.
because this streamlines that process.So basically what Japanese companies are doing with all the PSVITA/PS3/PS4 releases without any problems.
Not sure why one could need "special" hardware for this goal.
I expected this. I'm thinking 'Android console'-level device. Cheap and easy to develop for.
It makes me think that the first NX product could be basically a WiiU without the gamepad and different architecture/OS that could be sold around 100-150$.Or a handheld.
maybe. square enix didn't do a third dqm remake, but they did poet x and are porting viii. not sure if dqh counts as Sony gaining exclusivity or square enix preparing the platform for a dq as well, since it's possible dqxi could be multiplatform.
regarding monhun, nintendo has supported that series rather well, especially helping it grow in the west more than sony ever did. it seems less likely that they support the platform with two higher end spinoffs and then drop support after that. the series could simply be going multiplatform like it was last gen.
People here saying that Nintendo is lame, backwards and can go into oblivion unless NX is portable.
But what if NX is portable? I mean, 3DS was made in 2011, when Wii was stills supported. It has a fair share of bottlenecks that Nintendo cannot overcome even with New 3DS (screen resolution is the main one).
Mega Drive/Genesis was more powerful than SNES, failed
NX should be Wii U power built inside a smaller version of the gamepad (3DS replacement), sold with TV Dock and a Pro Controller to plug it into TV (Wii U replacement).
Hybrid console. Let's do it!
They did?Nintendo already confirmed that the NX won't be a hybrid.
Why is this shocking in any way? Why would you want games like GTA and CoD on NX when you can get them on PS4 and XB1? It makes sense for Nintendo to put out cheaper hardware that complements those systems.
skylanders and lego games are 3rd party
So far it sounds like im out then. I know ninty has to to whsts best for them but all i want is a powerful console with third party support.
I don't remember Verendus' list talking about regular MonHun getting on PS4. His lists are usually vague enough that he just meant the MonHun IP, and thus, Frontier 2.
A $300-$350 system is closer to the Wii U. If the console failed because surprise, a high powered console doesn't fix their 3rd party problem, or consumers don't want to pay a high entry to Nintendos content...
A PS4 like system is a much bigger risk. Nintendo being locked into another high priced console w/ no room to slash, is exactly like the Wii U situation.
This.Weird argument since it's mostly used for maps, display UI info and menu navigation.
It would be stupid of them to change a winning formula, and that is the clamshell design. And with that I think it makes sense to have a second screen.
I personally wouldn't want to go back to a Mario Kart that doesn't let you see what items the other racers are carrying in real time. It adds a new dimension to strategy. Or constantly pausing the game to bring up the map in Zelda.