All right, apparently it was announced before I actually got to the offer point, though I do remember almost being there when I saw people who constantly insisted this and wouldn't accept evidence otherwise:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=62492366&postcount=301
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=62496351&postcount=353
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=62500786&postcount=402
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=62545611&postcount=713
I rescind my comment, it was unfair in that case.
However, I will note why I was slightly more aggressive in this case.
Now, these could have definitely been out of a greater context, but you can see why I might have gotten an impression over the past year that you were really interested in one side getting exclusives and the other not even if evidence wasn't super strong.
---
As a side note:
Don't actually take this bet. Frank Gibeau has started both in external interviews that Respawn's game is only an exclusive due to being an EA Partners title and a new IP, and thus they felt safest going exclusively first, but that for internal titles they're going full multiplatform. I wasn't that serious, just more so curious if you were.
The Witcher 2 was indeed console exclusive, hence I thought there was a chance The Witcher 3 could well be. Silly, but people think Agent will be exclusive because of some contract stating Rockstar owing Sony. The nextSony fan who comes out with this, please bite his head off as well