SapientWolf
Trucker Sexologist
They're the exception rather than the rule though. This ain't exactly a nation of bodybuilders.Crunched said:BMI would make all bodybuilders obese.
They're the exception rather than the rule though. This ain't exactly a nation of bodybuilders.Crunched said:BMI would make all bodybuilders obese.
Yoritomo said:Eh good point. I never think of shorter dudes. But it's not really fair to say that xl automatically means fatass...
Well maybe. I buy XL AA (american apparel) and typically XL other shirts but they're much looser. Bought an XL shirt at a gun show (bald eagle + huge american flag + stupid desert Camo) and I swear that thing was a XXXL in disguise or something.
Also I wouldn't really put bodybuilders as a paragon of health due to the lengths they go to to achieve their show physiques. I'm not sure who I'd bet on to have heart problems first. 260 pound competition weight 5 foot 11 body builder or 260 pound 5' 11 fat guy.
HeadlessRoland said:True that, there are actually a good number of men who will fuck an obese chick. I wonder how many attractive chicks are down to fuck an obese man (assuming that they are not obese themselves)?
100% truth.3N16MA said:If the obese man is wealthy you will have hot women lining up.
Kylehimself said:I thought BMI was actually a good indicator when done correctly by a doctor. Not just the online effort were you stick in in height, weight, gender and age.
And oh yeah, good thread OP. Sums up my thoughts exactly.ScOULaris said:100% truth.
Also, I think women tend to care less about their partner being overweight (not obese) than men do. Just anecdotal observation, but that's how it has always seemed to me.
I'm no expert so I could be talking shit. But I thought when it was done properly by Drs and what have you, they done a lot more in depth tests.HeadlessRoland said:The problem is the vast diversity in the shapes and metabolic rates of humans. A simple equation cannot account for this so you will get some skewed results.
ScOULaris said:I'll never forget when an Italian cousin of mine made his first trip over to America about 15 years ago. We were at the mall with my mom and some other family members, and my mom asked him, "So, do you see any cute American girls?" He replied, "No. Everyone's fat." It was like a veil had been lifted from my eyes. After hearing that, I couldn't help but notice how many people are not only overweight, but just straight-up FAT. It was embarrassing, frankly.
Florida.Zwei said:You must live up north. Seriously. That can be the only answer.
ScOULaris said:Florida.
You have to understand that my cousin's comment didn't mean that there were obese people everywhere. Where he's from (Italy) the average person is thin and healthy looking. We laugh about the Aguilera picture because she used to be hotter, but it's not like she's huge by our standards. To an Italian coming to America for the first time, however, someone Christina's size looks like a fat slob. Obese people look like something out of science fiction to them.Zwei said:
Bullshit. It's how diets work. If you're not on it, you're not on it. Telling people it's okay to cheat on a diet because, "Hey, you're only human" is the same mindset that causes people to get enormous in the first place.Bealost said:I don't think the general population should be doing keto diets, or on any super strict diet. People who need to lose weight should be trying to make better, healthier choices on what they eat. They need to eat less than what their body needs to force it to use fat for fuel. The bolded statement is basically a terrible thing to tell anybody who's dieting. One slip up and you've ruined everything? People are going to slip up, whats important is getting back on a diet asap and not letting one cookie (I hesitate to call one cookie a slip up) snowball into a whole package of them because "you already ruined your diet."
Once your at a healthy weight you shouldn't "stop" your diet. You should strive to eat what your body needs no more, no less. But keeping to healthful choices.
Keto diets and such are great for people who need to get "unnaturally" lean (like bodybuilders).
Stet said:Well, they used to be right. The backlash over people wanting models to be too skinny was justified, but now people confuse "healthy weight" with "overweight."
Whether they know it, deep down, is not what we're talking about. A lot of people in western cultures make justifications for people who are overweight but not obese by calling them "curvy" or "normal."Pachterballs said:I'd like you to find me an example of this. People know what healthy weight is. Duh. And they know what overweight is too.
WanderingWind said:Painting a diet that makes you cut out garbage foods in favor of fruits, veggies and meat as super strict is exactly why people claim "diets don't work." It's not super strict. It's just a diet. It's great that some believe that eating a salad once a week constitutes a diet, but it's not doing anything for them. You said "healthy choices" like they're outside of the fruits, veggies and meat of a paleo diet. Those are healthy choices and sticking to them will cause you to lose weight. Period.
.
Protein =/= carbs =/= fatcameltoe said:Knowing your BMR is key!
I could eat 2000 calories a day of fruits and veggies and lean meats and still gain fat. I could eat 1200 calories a day of snack cakes and lose fat ( i would never do this, just making a point). Its all about caloric intake. Eat over maintenance, not matter what it is, YOU WILL GAIN FAT. PERIOD!
Everyone should know their BMR/RMR. You want to lose fat? Eat under your BMR. Its that simple.
ScOULaris said:You have to understand that my cousin's comment didn't mean that there were obese people everywhere. Where he's from (Italy) the average person is thin and healthy looking. We laugh about the Aguilera picture because she used to be hotter, but it's not like she's huge by our standards. To an Italian coming to America for the first time, however, someone Christina's size looks like a fat slob. Obese people look like something out of science fiction to them.
I can't speak for all of Europe, but have you been to Italy? I'm not lying or exaggerating when I say that most people look thin and healthy. Not malnourished or scrawny, although of course everyone's definition of "too thin" is different as it is with "too fat."All Hail C-Webb said:Bullshit on the thin and healthy.
If you look at much of the fashion that comes out of Europe, it's for the scrawny and weak, not thin and healthy.
ScOULaris said:I can't speak for all of Europe, but have you been to Italy? I'm not lying or exaggerating when I say that most people look thin and healthy. Not malnourished or scrawny, although of course everyone's definition of "too thin" is different as it is with "too fat."
Crunched said:Protein =/= carbs =/= fat
Really you mean Carbohydrates, Proteins, and Fat are different things? Groundbreaking stuff.
Not all calories are equal.
I suppose all meters or seconds aren't equal either.
It's not as simple as calories in vs calories out. It's about eating nutritiously dense foods.
There are a LOT of people who believe that it is. From a science perspective it seems to make sense, so I believe it
If I am lifting 5 reps at 80% of my max, and eating a bit over "maintenance" (which is ALWAYS imprecise), those calories will go toward muscle building and repair.
Heavy lifts of course promote lean mass gain.
This is why body measurements and body fat tests are important. Plateaus for low carb diets are often mistaken for stalled fat loss, when in fact they're due to an increase in lean tissue.
Bealost said:There are differences in calorie sources in that some are more nutritious than others (they have more nutrients) and are therefore the preferred ones for us to eat. Aside from a minuscule difference in the thermogenic effect (the energy used to digest said food). Calories are calories. I'm not saying you can live off 2000 K cal of cookies for the rest of your life.
He is exactly.ezrarh said:Aren't you contradicting yourself with that last sentence.
Crunched said:In a lot of cases, it should be replaced with blame. You don't go into a chemical withdrawal from eating healthier. If anything, it makes you feel better. Saying that there are mental triggers which cause people to eat is true, saying that is an addiction is in some cases true. No one is disputing that, as far as I can tell. But assuming that outside forces are responsible in the majority of cases is completely wrong. Being overweight is something you can't overcome until you start taking responsibility for yourself. And once you do that, it can be very easy.
Body composition is based entirely on diet and activity. You can't will yourself to be skinny, the same way you can't will yourself to be fat. There is a miniscule percentage which this doesn't apply to, who are medically unable to lose or gain weight due to endocrine dysfunction.
I don't believe the statement "fat people aren't trying hard enough." In some cases it's certainly true, but it's not universal. I think the bigger problem is fat people trying too hard, because they read things about addiction and post-diet weight gain and think they suddenly need to harden into steel -souled warriors in order to make any progress. That's not the case. For nearly everyone, losing weight is very easy. But blaming outside factors like genes and media creates a cultute of helplessness. People aren't helpless. They shouldn't allow themselves to lose full control of their bodies.
Drink a lot of milk every day, make sure to incorporate heavy squats and deadlifts into your routine, and make sure to get plenty of rest and recovery foods between workouts. Whey's your friend.DrPirate said:Italian-Canadian here.
I try to stuff my face with dual double big macs, two steaks every monday and wednesdays, pasta dishes tuesedays and thursdays, and 3 eggs with bread and such every morning with continuous snacking all day and I can't seem to break 180 pounds (I'm 6'2). I would like a more "meatier" frame, and I work out three times a week, but I can't seem to get the right size I want.
Genetics has ALOT to do with it. Everyone in my family is skinny, and we consume enough food to feed the average family for a week every day.
ezrarh said:Aren't you contradicting yourself with that last sentence.
Drink a gallon of milk a day for a few weeks besides eating everything you normally do. If you still cant get more bodyweight you should see a doctor.DrPirate said:Italian-Canadian here.
I try to stuff my face with dual double big macs, two steaks every monday and wednesdays, pasta dishes tuesedays and thursdays, and 3 eggs with bread and such every morning with continuous snacking all day and I can't seem to break 180 pounds (I'm 6'2). I would like a more "meatier" frame, and I work out three times a week, but I can't seem to get the right size I want.
Genetics has ALOT to do with it. Everyone in my family is skinny, and we consume enough food to feed the average family for a week every day.
Kylehimself said:I'm no expert so I could be talking shit. But I thought when it was done properly by Drs and what have you, they done a lot more in depth tests.
milkyjay20 said:first off, don't even act like you care about these people. you guys just don't want to see them. be honest.
Numeric sizes are irrelevant if we are talking about the cut of a garment. Maybe stuff like Raf Simons or Dior Homme (not so much anymore in actual production vs a few years ago) is built for thin men, but is that the norm? No. Dolce runways look like this:All Hail C-Webb said:I haven't been to Italy, but the clothing sold/designed there speaks volumes.
If you have any semblance of an upper body, it doesn't fit, even if it's loose around the stomach/waist.
London is pretty bad too. I need to buy at least XL (often XXL) over there, when I can comfortably fit into Large in the US.
I find it hilarious how if you post something stupid enough on GAF, professional writers and organizations will now mock you.Enosh said:I don't know if this falls under the rules of acceptable bumping or not (sorry if it doesn't), but
gz to the OP, you made it on cracked! (second link under point 2) ^^
http://www.cracked.com/article_1946...at-make-you-wrong-more-than-you-think_p2.html
One exception disproves the rule. Every time.SapientWolf said:They're the exception rather than the rule though.
3N16MA said:He also had a child with Heidi Klum when she was 30 and he was 56:
Got to get that money.
macuser1of5 said:Numeric sizes are irrelevant if we are talking about the cut of a garment. Maybe stuff like Raf Simons or Dior Homme (not so much anymore in actual production vs a few years ago) is built for thin men, but is that the norm? No. Dolce runways look like this:
what a waifish stickman.
and omg at this bump. hi internets!