Baconsammy
Banned
Your reading comprehension is shit.
Means very little coming from the person that said prevention is a myth.
Your reading comprehension is shit.
Means very little coming from the person that said prevention is a myth.
Taking an argument to it's most absurd conclusion is often an effective way to show that the argument is poor. You're saying that prevention helps stop crime, Devo is saying that in a society where women are forced to be as modest as possible, they're still raped.
HMMMMM
It is. Your reading comprehension is still shit.
Actually, taking an argument to it's most absurd conclusion is the horrible way of making an argument. Reductio ad absurdum is a logical fallacy.
I got no issues with the rest of your statement though.
Hmm, not quite...that would only be the case if what Devo said and what she was arguing against were more than remotely related...I don't think anyone has suggested women dressing more modestly as being a preventative measure so I'm not sure where Devo was going with that commentAargumentum ad absurdum.
You still miss the point. It's not ABOUT prevention Bacon it's about culture. You walking your SO home every night didn't prevent her getting raped, nor did watching her drink like a hawk. It just made you feel safer (probably her too).
Considering you took an article about bars in Montana and then brought up Middle Eastern women in Burkas and women being raped in South Africa, I'm pretty good with my reading comprehension. I know what's being discussed here.
Considering you took an article about bars in Montana and then brought up Middle Eastern women in Burkas and women being raped in South Africa, I'm pretty good with my reading comprehension. I know what's being discussed here.
No no no, It is not a logical fallacy when used in the proper context, as Devo did.
You think some random preventative measures that women do (and some already do out of fear) will somehow prevent rapes which are for the most part done by acquaintances. The way to significantly reduce rapes is to tackle attitudes that encourage or are complicit in letting rapes occur. If you honestly think telling women to do X will actually do anything to the numbers, you're flat out ignorant.
She's trying to illustrate that misogyny isn't something that is bred in certain settings, it's world wide. 'Prevention' doesn't mean shit in South Africa, and it doesn't mean shit in Missoula. Unless by 'Prevention' you mean reversing the trend of Slut Shaming and Victim Blaming.
I don't buy that. It misrepresents the original argument. At this point, I'm pretty sure Devo and Baconsammy are arguing about two completely different things that addresses neither point the other party is trying to make.
Going to bars with friends and always keeping everyone's drinks under someone's supervision prevents anyone getting Roofied. Prevention works. Traveling to bars in a group and back home in a group prevents rapes (and numerous other crimes). Saying it's a myth is absurd.
Going to bars with friends and always keeping everyone's drinks under someone's supervision prevents anyone getting Roofied. Prevention works. Traveling to bars in a group and back home in a group prevents rapes (and numerous other crimes). Saying it's a myth is absurd.
Taking an argument to it's most absurd conclusion is often an effective way to show that the argument is poor. You're saying that prevention helps stop crime, Devo is saying that in a society where women are forced to be as modest as possible, they're still raped.
HMMMMM
Prevention works according to you, some random bloke on the internet who isn't even supported by the stats surrounding rape.
I think his point (and Baconsammy can correct me if I'm wrong) was merely that taking preventative measures increases a woman's ability to defend herself and consequently should (at least logically) help counter assaults of any kind, not just sexual. I don't believe he was commentating on the deeper social/psychological factors that perpetuate sexual violence against women, or implying that these preventative measures are a guaranteed method to prevent an actual assault.
So I'm not really sure what the disagreement here is based on. Seems like a misunderstanding to me
OK, show us your stats that shows crime prevention doesn't lower the rate of crime.
no! montana is great. everyone should visit.
OK, show us your stats that shows crime prevention doesn't lower the rate of crime.
Show us your stats that it does?
There is no burden of proof in this discussion because the proof is impossible to obtain.
So really bringing up stats, on either side, is meaningless...
Are those numbers actually verified?
It's really scary to think that it's the people who are close to you who would do such horrible things. I can't even imagine...
I think my "preventative measures" are basically the best they can be. I like never go to bars (I don't like to drink) and I never hang out with male acquaintances 1 on 1.
It's unnerving to see people saying that's all useless and I'm supposed to accept that I'm at the mercy of whoever I meet and I'm just lucky they decide not to do things.
Prevention has to be useful right? It can't just be a "myth"? I mean, if you don't put yourself in situations where stuff can happen, then it shouldn't happen right?
But I guess my normal life is already very limited compared to these bar-going college students. So these preventative measures don't really impose or make me change my chosen lifestyle.
Another by her boyfriend.
You mean bring up crimes or analogies that aren't rape when we're specifically talking about rape? No. No thanks. I don't need your disingenuous horseshit when you refuse to acknowledge that rape is a by product of misogyny and culture.
Yes, because saying some prevention can go a long way to creating some extra safety when drinking out at a bar is "disingenuous bullshit". Show me where I refuse to acknowledge that rape is a product of misogyny and culture. Show me. All I've said is that you assertion that prevention is a myth is idiotic beyond words.
I don't see how it is. People take preventative measures for other crimes and no one sees that as unacceptable...like I said early, people don't walk through dangerous places alone at night. You don't consider that measure unacceptable do you?
And you lump in accidents with natural disasters as if they're the same. Natural disasters are completely out of anyone's control. Accidents could, in some cases, have actually been intentional just like any other crimes.
The point is, there's only 2 ways to reduce crimes from happening and possibly prevent them from happening
1. Do something about the potential culprits and
2. Help protect yourself/lower your chances of being a victim
Why is it that in ANY other crime both 1 and 2 are suggested means of combating it while with rape, 2 is not acceptable?
One of my friends was raped by her coworker. Another by her boyfriend.
Bacon, prevention isn't a Myth when it comes to your house burning down, or your car being stolen, but that is not extended to rape which isn't a product of being unprepared, it's a product deep rooted in our culture.
Yes, because saying some prevention can go a long way to creating some extra safety when drinking out at a bar is "disingenuous bullshit". Show me where I refuse to acknowledge that rape is a product of misogyny and culture. Show me. All I've said is that you assertion that prevention is a myth is idiotic beyond words.
And no one with a brain is saying that taking precautions when going out to a bar full of people you don't know is going to prevent that.
JokerOfSpades,
I halfway agree with you.
:0
One of my friends was raped by her coworker. Another by her boyfriend.
Friend of a friend was raped by her boyfriend. Now her whole future is changed because she has to raise a child she never asked for.
Saying the victim should take preventative measures treats rape like its a thing that just happens, like natural disasters or accidents. Rape is just a risk you run, better be prepared for it. Is it really so hard to see how that attitude is unacceptable?
She's trying to illustrate that misogyny isn't something that is bred in certain settings, it's world wide. 'Prevention' doesn't mean shit in South Africa, and it doesn't mean shit in Missoula. Unless by 'Prevention' you mean reversing the trend of Slut Shaming and Victim Blaming.
I'd wager it's because faaaar too much focus is placed on #2, and relatively little on #1 when it comes to rape discussions in general. So repeating #2 for the millionth time comes off as a bit patronizing (especially when there's little evidence that focusing on #2 actually solves the core problem). A couple other examples of how this phenomenon manifests itself in other areas:
The "don't walk into a bad neighborhood due to crime" advice has been brought up a couple times, and how we consider that acceptable. In the abstract, sure, that's well-meaning advice, but if 90% of the discussion is focused on "avoid bad neighborhoods!", with 10% of the discussion focusing on addressing poverty, mental illness, drug policy, etc., that displays a severe lack of prioritization. It lends credence to the idea of sweeping the problem under the rug and hoping for the best, as opposed to addressing it directly (especially, again, if it ends up being the majority of the discussion).
Another example is when people talk about the economy. A lot of focus sometimes gets placed on "hey, things are tough, so you gotta hustle to make it! Here's what you can do! Work 3 jobs! Go to school! Bootstraps!" Which, again, is good advice in the abstract ("why would anyone be opposed to working hard?"), but all too often, it shows a tacit acceptance of the idea that "bad economy with no jobs" is some natural way of the world with no way to solve it, so we should just suck it up and deal with it by working 3 jobs. But when the discussion focuses on this, it often ends up serving as a distraction for solving the real core issues (for example, specific policies that have been put in place that have led to a bad economy). So instead of people, say, arguing and voting to change those policies that have been put in place (which would actually solve the real problem), this weird sense of nihilism takes hold ("everything is fucked, so I'll just do what I can to make it!")
Essentially, people are tired of focusing on "symptoms" and realize that if you're really genuinely interested in solving the problem, the vast majority of resources, discussion, and advice should be focused on the "disease". Repeating the same symptom treating advice over and over does nothing to actually get to the core of the issue, and is ultimately like trying to use a band-aid on a hemophiliac.
(It can come off as Concern trolling as well)
You think some random preventative measures that women do (and some already do out of fear) will somehow prevent rapes which are for the most part done by acquaintances. The way to significantly reduce rapes is to tackle attitudes that encourage or are complicit in letting rapes occur. If you honestly think telling women to do X will actually do anything to the numbers, you're flat out ignorant.
Now we're getting somewhere.
What I'm afraid of Bacon is that all this talk of 'Prevention' is going to cause women who did not prepare to be raped 24/7 to feel shameful and guilty if they ARE raped, which will lead to her not reporting the rape.
Do you understand that at least?
Coolness
Where do you disagree? Might as well discuss
So... there's nothing we can do then? That's kind of scary. Very scary.
Society isn't going to change within our lifetimes...
I probably shouldn't have come into this thread.
So... there's nothing we can do then? That's kind of scary. Very scary.
Society isn't going to change within our lifetimes...
I probably shouldn't have come into this thread.
Mostly the part where we tell women specifically that they have to change how they interact in society because men rape them.
OK, show us your stats that shows crime prevention doesn't lower the rate of crime.
It's not idiotic. My friends did all those precautionary measures you seem so fit to say will reduce rape and were raped anyway. So what's the point in them? To couch our behavior? To give an out for when we wore our hair in a ponytail? They don't serve much of a purpose if you are just dealing with the effects, the fact that a man is intent upon raping rather than engaging as a society why he is or what as a culture, if anything, we did to tacitly encourage such behavior. And there are a lot of things we do as a culture to tacitly encourage rape or turn a blind eye when it happens. But let's keep telling women what they do wrong.
This is just completely nonsensical.
actually, one analogy that might actually make sense is the recent TSA screening discussions. Surely it at least prevents some terrorism right? It's not the sole thing to be done, but it's helped lessen terrorism at least a little bit, right?
When in actuality, it's all just security theater. It gives the feeling of being "in control" and "prevention", but it doesn't actually solve the core issue, or even make us safer than we would've been otherwise.
Oh - I wasn't particularly noting things that they should change, rather things that they should continue doing - mainly going places in groups.
Unfortunately, that will do nothing for dates (biggest problem), as that would impede their comfort. But bars, parties, etc? Definitely go with some friends... I'd say particularly female, but I know some female friends who can't stand hanging out with other women.
I guess it doesn't help with the grander majority of rapes after all... well, if you have female friends, at least see if they'll join you at a party/club or whatever.
That's NEVER been the argument here.
I'd wager it's because faaaar too much focus is placed on #2, and relatively little on #1 when it comes to rape discussions in general. So repeating #2 for the millionth time comes off as a bit patronizing (especially when there's little evidence that focusing on #2 actually solves the core problem). A couple other examples of how this phenomenon manifests itself in other areas:
The "don't walk into a bad neighborhood due to crime" advice has been brought up a couple times, and how we consider that acceptable. In the abstract, sure, that's well-meaning advice, but if 90% of the discussion is focused on "avoid bad neighborhoods!", with 10% of the discussion focusing on addressing poverty, mental illness, drug policy, etc., that displays a severe lack of prioritization. It lends credence to the idea of sweeping the problem under the rug and hoping for the best, as opposed to addressing it directly (especially, again, if it ends up being the majority of the discussion).
Another example is when people talk about the economy. A lot of focus sometimes gets placed on "hey, things are tough, so you gotta hustle to make it! Here's what you can do! Work 3 jobs! Go to school! Bootstraps!" Which, again, is good advice in the abstract ("why would anyone be opposed to working hard?"), but all too often, it shows a tacit acceptance of the idea that "bad economy with no jobs" is some natural way of the world with no way to solve it, so we should just suck it up and deal with it by working 3 jobs. But when the discussion focuses on this, it often ends up serving as a distraction for solving the real core issues (for example, specific policies that have been put in place that have led to a bad economy). So instead of people, say, arguing and voting to change those policies that have been put in place (which would actually solve the real problem), this weird sense of nihilism takes hold ("everything is fucked, so I'll just do what I can to make it!")
Essentially, people are tired of focusing on "symptoms" and realize that if you're really genuinely interested in solving the problem, the vast majority of resources, discussion, and advice should be focused on the "disease". Repeating the same symptom treating advice over and over does nothing to actually get to the core of the issue, and is ultimately like trying to use a band-aid on a hemophiliac.
(It can come off as Concern trolling as well)
That's been my argument. Prevention rhetoric is poisonous Baconsammy, it is hardly preventative and it continues the Culture of Rape.