1UP's 9.0 vindicated. That demo was awesome and the song selection of the game looks great.mood said:The demo for GH3 is so excellent, Im glad Neversoft and Red Octane did such a great job with the game.
watDruz said:i dont know why You guys banned me. I read them for fun, and perhaps just to get another take on it. Sometimes there's a quality to a game that I've actually missed, and a good review, a rare thing indeed, might be able to pinpoint that. And then I read some reviews written by known buttholes just because I need some easy agitation to go with my morning coffee. There's the odd review where I'm actually looking for information on whether a game is worth a purchase or not, but the aforementioned poor standards in reviews makes that a rare occurrence.
Druz said:i dont know why You guys banned me. I read them for fun, and perhaps just to get another take on it. Sometimes there's a quality to a game that I've actually missed, and a good review, a rare thing indeed, might be able to pinpoint that. And then I read some reviews written by known buttholes just because I need some easy agitation to go with my morning coffee. There's the odd review where I'm actually looking for information on whether a game is worth a purchase or not, but the aforementioned poor standards in reviews makes that a rare occurrence.
Gigglepoo said:2) The diminishing returns comment praised the PS2 more than it insulted the PS3. UYA looked incredible. It's hard to wow Joe (apparantly) when the previous game already looked ridiculously awesome.
What? Dupe account, wtf?Druz said:i dont know why You guys banned me. I read them for fun, and perhaps just to get another take on it. Sometimes there's a quality to a game that I've actually missed, and a good review, a rare thing indeed, might be able to pinpoint that. And then I read some reviews written by known buttholes just because I need some easy agitation to go with my morning coffee. There's the odd review where I'm actually looking for information on whether a game is worth a purchase or not, but the aforementioned poor standards in reviews makes that a rare occurrence.
What demo were you playing? Score sounds about right judging from the demo.DKnight said:WTF @ Jericho!??
The demo was very good! WTF!? can someone post a summary of the review?
Tieno said:What? Dupe account, wtf?
Shit is getting interesting by the minute.
da fuck?Druz said:i dont know why You guys banned me. I read them for fun, and perhaps just to get another take on it. Sometimes there's a quality to a game that I've actually missed, and a good review, a rare thing indeed, might be able to pinpoint that. And then I read some reviews written by known buttholes just because I need some easy agitation to go with my morning coffee. There's the odd review where I'm actually looking for information on whether a game is worth a purchase or not, but the aforementioned poor standards in reviews makes that a rare occurrence.
Ah, okay.skip said:tree-sitty. I'm trying to get my hands on the PS3/Wii versions this week, and I'm not sure what the status of the PC code is. I'll check with GFW nerdz.
Why did you change your name? I almost didn't recognise you.RumFore said:Ok...why is that post so shocking that so many are quoting it and saying wat, wut, what?
Go back two pages and read the posts of Darji. It's so worth it. He got banned, and it now appears is posting using an alt account.RumFore said:Ok...why is that post so shocking that so many are quoting it and saying wat, wut, what?
Gigglepoo said:Two points:
1) Up Your Arsenal is my second favorite platformer ever. I don't think the animation comment your seaching for is important at all.
2) The diminishing returns comment praised the PS2 more than it insulted the PS3. UYA looked incredible. It's hard to wow Joe (apparantly) when the previous game already looked ridiculously awesome.
alske said:Just from playing R&C 1-4 and the demo of Future I'd agree with Joe's comment on graphics. Future looks better, but it is not the jump that happened from PS1 to PS2. Maybe I'll disagree when I get the actual game (hopefully later today). I also concede that I'm comparing how Future actually looks to how I remember R&C 3 looking.
That.Darji said:This message is hidden because Darji is on your ignore list.
Ploid 3.0 said:lol I'm kidding. I thought that was very funny. ratchet2vsratchetfuture.jpg
AltogetherAndrews said:He quoted one of my earlier posts, but added that part in the beginning. I think he's trying to suggest that me and Darj are the same person, but I could be wrong. Well, I hope I'm wrong, because that'd be an embarrassingly weak effort on dude's part.
alske said:You can joke, but I'd like to see some of those comparison pictures. I never said the game didn't look better. Merely that the jump from Spyro to R&C was much larger than the jump from R&C to RCF.
Druz said:i dont know why You guys banned me. I read them for fun, and perhaps just to get another take on it. Sometimes there's a quality to a game that I've actually missed, and a good review, a rare thing indeed, might be able to pinpoint that. And then I read some reviews written by known buttholes just because I need some easy agitation to go with my morning coffee. There's the odd review where I'm actually looking for information on whether a game is worth a purchase or not, but the aforementioned poor standards in reviews makes that a rare occurrence.
Ploid 3.0 said:It's in the ratchet and clank future official thread. Too comparison shots. One of similar setting, and one of huge boss fights. R&C ps3 made the PS2's look flat and boring. I guess that's how R&C made spyro look also, and spyro still seem graphically good due to it's cartoony nature.
Still pictures don't account for the game in motion also, and ps3 ratchet once again makes a big leap past ps2's. Also the sound and use of voice work throughout the demo while playing. Also the amount of things on the ps3's, image quality, and such brings it up from just being prettier.
Druz said:Whoops, I thought I quoted Darj... you guys post similarly.
AltogetherAndrews said:Yeah, sure we do. You're weak.
Druz said:That wasn't a jab. I thought there was only one person fighting with a dumb opinion, in a rush I copy pasted your shit. Really, it is a tragically dull mistake that you've dressed up as something else.
skip said:stop reading our site.
Drinky Crow said:Long post
Drinky Crow said:hint: evolution doesn't necessarily equal better; it can safely and accurately mean "increased complexity," which is what sunshine offered over mario 64. i personally liked sunshine better than sm64, which i thought was a dreadfully dry experience, but on the other hand, my definition clearly allows for a preference of mario 64 as well. hurr.
Brandon F said:Really though? I would have thought the horrendous 'raft' based sections, extreme abundance of timed challenges, overkill of repeated mini-boss stuffing, and often irksome camera and collision niggles would have given you the same "eff this!" feeling SMS gave me.
Granted the water was awesome looking, the airtime occasionally astounding, and those micro-platformer levels were something to savor from a mostly half-baked Mario venture.
Ten-Song said:Also, the bitching for R&C needs to stop, it got good scores.
Drinky Crow said:i can't imagine why you'd want to address mario 64 versus sunshine in a vaccuum given this thread's context, but hey: that's you.
freethought said:Oh, and I'm well aware of the definition of evolution and outside of the secret areas (which were a tragically small part of the game) I did not find the level design in SMS to be any more complex than SM64. You also mentioned the increased variety of settings in SMS which I most definitely disagree with.
Anyway, as you say, you're far more interested in bashing a game you haven't played than having any sort of reasoned discussion so I'm running away from this thread.