travisbickle said:
For those complaining you should meet at least two (point 1 mandatory) of these criteria
1. Be European
2. Own PS2 games
3. Be Considering buying a ps3 within the next 9 months
Except that it seems obvious Sony intends to sell this version of the system to the rest of the world, too, so if you're planning on buying a PS3 within the next 9 months anywhere, this is definitely a consideration.
I don't understand how people are saying this is a good thing. This is still a really bad thing, it's just not as bad. You are still getting value removed with absolutely no effect on the price. And the rest of the world has this removed feature to look forward to as well.
People making jokes about how a thousand titles is going to cover all the good ones aren't getting the point other posters are making. It's not going to be the best thousand. There's going to be fan favorite, big shit missing, I'd bet hard on it. The PS2 has very unique architecture that was exploited in a lot of different and cool ways. The more "off the beaten path" a game is, (like Shadow of the Colossus), the more specific work will have to be done to make it work.
I'm confident Sony will work hard on this, probably harder than MS has, but there's likely always going to be stuff from each gamer's collection that won't play on PS3, and therefore we won't be able to get rid of our PS2s, which means BC (until they start scaling) loses all semblance of value to us. Still nice for those new to PlayStation, but how big is the audience of "Wants PS3 but never owned PS2"?
This is value lost, with no compensation for the consumer. Considering how often they reinforce the "value" for the price of the PS3, this is not a good thing, even if it's not as colossally bad as some imagined it would be.